Operationalising LiFE: Policy Approaches to Drive Circularity through
Consumption Behaviours
A circular economy is
a systems approach to economic activity that aims to reduce the
environmental impacts of production and consumption processes. While in
its most basic applications in industrial ecology, it is primarily a
waste management strategy. However, its larger objective is to drive
larger systemic change by informing consumption behaviours to reduce the
overall demand for products and services and minimise virgin resource
extraction, thereby facilitating the decoupling of economic growth from
its material footprint.
In designing long-term policy strategies to meet the goals and targets
of SDG 12 and promote sustainable consumption and production practices,
it is critical to nudge consumer behaviours, both individual and
institutional, by shifting priorities away towards the top of the 9R
framework of the circular economy approach (refer to Figure 1) and
looking at a more radical rethinking of consumer needs and wants, and
new ways to meet them. As a thumb rule, environmental pressures reduce
as one goes higher up the 9R hierarchy. This makes it crucial to aim at
higher-order circularity strategies by redesigning consumption patterns,
thus going beyond the myopic and primitive focus on recovering and
recycling secondary resources and encouraging consumers to
rethink their product choices, and reducing their overall
consumption, while refusing unsustainable products.
Figure 1. 9R framework of
the circular economy approach
Besides the necessary
improvements in product design and core technologies, policy frameworks
and business models must facilitate systemic socio-institutional changes
and shift fundamental consumer behaviour from being ‘consumers’ of
resources to ‘users’. This can help meet aspirational user demands but
at a lower environmental cost by developing sharing models and
encouraging a culture of repair and reuse. These new models will need to
be accompanied by behavioural strategies to increase the sociocultural
acceptability of repurposed, refurbished, or recycled products,
enhancing the availability of choice to meet consumer expectations at
comparable price points, and enhancing trust in new solutions and
avoiding greenwashing by improving the availability of reliable product
information.
India’s flagship policy
initiative ‘LiFE - Lifestyle for the Environment’ is a welcome step in
this direction. While the nuances of its guiding principles and
strategies may continue to evolve, the unprecedented focus on informing
demand-side patterns plays a key role. The challenge is operationalising
the LiFE mission through intelligent policy design with a long-term
vision that can effectively embed circularity into consumption
behaviours and avoid the long-term socio-technical lock-in of
unsustainable solutions.
A useful approach can be
designing ‘policy packages’ that restrict unsustainable practices and
promote future good practices while continuously responding to changing
baselines. A ‘framework legislation’ approach can also be helpful, such
as the EU Circular Economy Action Plan, which does not set specific
measures but establishes processes and mechanisms that enable their
future adoption. These can also effectively lay down frameworks or
coordination mechanisms between different government departments and
agencies to contribute to the same vision through improved policy
architecture. For instance, in India, implementation strategies for LiFE
must allow for and proactively encourage the inclusion of various
ministries, including environment, industry, consumer affairs,
education, skill development, urban affairs, finance, and others.
It is clear that nudging
individual behaviours to drive sustainable consumption is not an easy
feat; however, it is an essential prerequisite to mainstreaming
circularity. To do this, policy strategies must understand and
incorporate the finer nuances of human choice-making and their sociocultural drivers while allowing for adaptive pathways that can
adequately respond to evolving external environments.
References
Fuchs, Doris, Marlyne Sahakian, Tobias
Gumbert, Antonietta Di Giulio, Michael Maniates, Sylvia Lorek, & Antonia
Graf. 2021. ‘Consumption Corridors: Living a Good Life within
Sustainable Limits’. London: Routledge
Garrett, Elizabeth. 2004. ‘The purposes of framework legislation’.
SSRN Electronic Journal. 10.2139/ssrn.504783.
United Nations Environment Programme. 2015. ‘Sustainable Consumption
and Production Global edition: A Handbook for Policymakers’.
Available at https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=400&nr=1951&menu=35,
[accessed on 25 September 2021].
United Nations Environment Programme. 2021. ‘Catalysing Science-based
Policy Action on Sustainable Consumption and Production – The
value-chain approach and its application to food, construction and
textiles’. Available at: https://www.unep.org/resources/publication/catalysing-science-based-policy-action-sustainable-consumption-and-production
,[accessed on 25 September 2021].
Mohak Gupta
mgupta@devalt.org
Back to Contents
|