Service Delivery in
the WASH Sector
S ervice
delivery is crucial in the context of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene
(WASH). In India approximately, 99 million people do not have access to
improved water sources and 626 million do not have access to sanitation
facilities.1
The government is responsible for providing these services, but
unfortunately the government’s delivery and upkeep of WASH resources is
unreliable.
Waterborne diseases affect 37.7 million Indians
annually. 1.5 million children are estimated to die of diarrhoea alone
and 73 million working days are lost due to waterborne disease each
year.
The public water supply system has not been able to
provide WASH facilities to communities. Private players are entering and
flourishing in the market because of their efficient delivery of
services.
In context of water, in rural areas there is
a lack of centralised purification facilities and the water gets
contaminated either at source or during the supply. In urban areas, due
to deteriorating infrastructure, even water that has been purified at
source gets contaminated during the supply. The primary reasons for this
contamination are open defecation (in rural areas) and mixing with
sewage (in urban areas). To complicate the matter further, water also
gets contaminated at the point of use due to unsanitary handling and
storage. Not just the quality, but the supply of adequate quantity of
water is also a major concern in India where only 31% of the 167 million
rural households in India have access to tap water. 2 The
key channels of delivery of water services are as follows:
1. Piped Water Supply: The government has laid
down a network of pipes (mainly in urban areas) that provide treated (at
source) drinking water either directly to households or to community tap
stands. This water is provided free of cost or at a very low cost. As
mentioned earlier, the water tends to get contaminated either at the
source, during transmission or while collection and storage.

2. Retail Shops/Distributor Model: This
distribution model is followed by private companies selling chlorine
tablets, low-cost offline filters or even relatively expensive water
purification solutions such as RO/UV and bottled water. Currently, this
model does not have an efficient ‘last mile’ delivery system and thus
these products are not easily or readily available to the end user,
especially in rural and peri-urban areas. The other problem is of
disclosure of information by these private companies about the quality
of the product.
3. Water Tankers: Government as well as
private players provide water to the community through water tankers
where there is shortage of water. The water in these tankers is
generally treated with chlorine. The quality of this water is
questionable as no guarantee for safety is provided by the service
provider.
4. Government Distribution System: The
government has dug handpumps and bore wells (mainly in rural areas) to
provide access to water. The chances of this water being contaminated at
source are high due to increasing ground water pollution due to use of
chemical fertilizers and open defecation.
In the context of sanitation, the situation
is much worse, as India accounts for about 50% of the world’s open
defecating population. 3
The sanitation coverage of urban India is much higher
than rural India where people prefer to defecate in open. Government of
India is running flagship schemes for more than a decade to overcome the
deficit, but still there is a huge lag because the focus is on providing
hardware services (engineering or construction elements) and the
software component (capacity building, institutional support, financial
planning) is missing while delivering these services. So, the households
which have toilets in rural areas still prefer to defecate in open
areas. The reasons for this problem are two-fold. The toilets built
under these flagship programmes are often inadequate with no access to
water and soak pits. So generally after using it for two to three
months, the toilets are transformed into storing spaces.
The other side of the problem is that in India, using
a facility for defecation in or near your house may not seem natural as
the people have been practicing open defecation since decades. The
sanitation component needs to focus on the whole service delivery
ecosystem which supports construction of soak pits, cleaning of soak
pits, sewage treatment, drain and lane improvements, community awareness
programmes for improving sanitation and hygiene practices, along with
incentives to communities / villages for achieving ‘open defecation
status’.
Current Policy Scenario
The responsibility for water supply and sanitation at
the central government level is shared by the Ministry of Drinking Water
and Sanitation for rural areas and the Ministry of Urban Development for
urban areas. The responsibility for provision of water supply and
sanitation in India is a state government responsibility under the
Indian Constitution. States may give the responsibility to the
Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRI) in rural areas or municipalities in
urban areas, called Urban Local Bodies (ULB). At present, states
generally plan, design and execute water supply schemes (and often
operate them) through their State Departments (Public Health Engineering
or Rural Development Engineering) or State Water Boards.
Recently to solve the sanitation crisis, the
government launched a Swaach Bharat Mission for both urban and
rural areas with a mission to make India - Open Defecation free by 2019.
This mission does not focus merely on constructing toilets but there is
a component of IEC activities, Capacity Building, Solid and Liquid Waste
Management and Setting of Village Sanitary Marts.
Policy Recommendations for Improving Service Delivery
of WASH Services
• Subsidies should be set
into place keeping in mind the whole life cycle approach. For instance
in the space of sanitation, there are subsidies for construction of
toilets but limited subsidies are available for treatment of sewage and
cleaning of soak pits.
• There a need to track
the performance of the service delivering entity on the service level
benchmarks developed by Central Ministries for rural and urban areas.
The state government should be tracked and the grants should be released
against their performance on service level benchmarks.
• Data collection system
needs to be strengthened for understanding the efficiency of delivered
water and sanitation services. As presently the quality of services are
compromised in order to reach numbers. In the context of water, the
quality of water supplied through the particular source is not known to
the end user. In the sanitation area, there is data available on how
many toilets are funded as part of the government schemes but there is
no information on how many people are using the toilets and how many are
redundant. The data collection system should be transparent and
accountable for designing effective delivery of services.
• Favourable environment
for innovation to incubate as presently the current policy environment
is very rigorous and only innovation which has huge financial backing
can overcome those processes. This needs to loosen up a little so that
small innovations can contribute in improving services.
• Public Private
Partnerships need to be explored when it comes to water and sanitation
services. There are some initiatives which have been piloted which can
be scaled up in order to provide quality services to the end users.
• In WASH there is no
‘One solution fit All’ as people’s needs, demands and behaviors are
different from each other. There is a need to promote community based
solutions as they focus on empowering local people as people are at the
core of designing these solutions.
• Third Party Validation
of Water Treatment Products: There is a need to formulate disclosure
norms for water treatment products which should be validated by a third
party before the product enters the market to safeguard consumer
interests. There is also a need to reduce the gap between standards
development and technology advancement.
All these recommendations are necessary for improving
the service delivery of the WASH sector. There is a need to form
stronger regulatory mechanisms for States to follow so that quality and
reliable services are delivered as the investment in WASH has an impact
on GDP and economic wellbeing. q
Kavneet Kaur
kkaur@devalt.org
Endnotes
1
http://www.unicef.org/media/media_45481.html
2
http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2014/01/07/rural-water-supply-sanitation-four-indian-states
3
www.worldbank.org/.../rural-water-supply-sanitation-four-indian-states
Back to Contents
|