Green Bonding Our Way to
Sustainable Energy
R egarded as
the third most attractive market for renewable energy, India has set
itself an ambitious target of achieving 175 GW of renewable energy
capacity by 2022, from a current figure of 30 GW. Besides the obvious
environmental benefits, there is a growing realisation of multiple
economic and social benefits of clean energy. Many of the renewable
sources especially solar and wind energy are now within reach of
achieving grid parity as they are becoming cost-competitive.
Such a transition, however, demands a huge funding of
US $200 billion. High rates of interest and poor terms for debt, raises
the cost of clean energy in India by 24 to 32 per cent as compared to US
and Europe. 1
This together with insufficient budgetary allocation and a large fiscal
deficit makes financing a daunting task.
Green Bonds
Like any other bond, it is a financial instrument
used for raising funds from the debt market for projects relating to
renewable energy, climate-mitigation/adaptation etc. The lower rates of
interest on such bonds makes it attractive for the issuer as a
commitment is seen towards clean and green development. For the
investor, the incentive lies in a stable return as the risk of
non-performance lies with the issuer and not on the success of the
project.
Globally the green bonds market has increased 3-folds
in size and is forecasted to jump to the US $100 billion mark by the end
of 2015. 2
Historically, led by multilateral banks such as World Bank, Asian
Development Bank, European Investment Bank and national governments;
many corporate players are now entering the field. In India, the
Export-Import Bank kick-started green bonds, issuing bonds worth US $500
million, followed by Yes Bank, which has raised US $160 million.3
The oversubscription in these issues highlights the keenness amongst
investors to take on projects with positive environmental impact.
Can ‘Green Bonds’ be the Magical Solution?
The answer, unfortunately, is a bit murky. While
‘green’ bonds seem to offer us a good alternative, the market is still
at its infancy. The definition and standards of a ‘green bond’ are
rather vague, as it has mostly been left at the discretion of the
issuer. For instance, should bonds issued by a nuclear power plant be
considered green, as on one hand there is lowering of emissions but on
the other hand, there is creation of toxic waste? 4
The danger of ‘greenwashing’ (i.e. using funds
for purposes other than what they were originally issued for) along
with the ambiguity on transparency and reporting aspects increases the
risk of dampening investors’ confidence and the market’s integrity. The
problem becomes murkier, with the issue of ‘additionality’ - are green
bonds enabling funding of new projects (new capital) or simply
refinancing old ones producing no ‘new’ environmental benefits. For
example, the repackaging of its existing loans and selling them as ‘social
impact bonds’ by Lloyds Bank5
or refinancing of bonds that were initially issued for building energy
efficient building by MIT.6
India, further, faces the challenges of high currency hedging costs,
poor sovereign ratings, double taxation and low tenure (averaging 3-10
years as compared to 10-15 years in other countries).7
Efforts are being made in the forms of Green Bond
Principles (voluntary guidelines for issuance of green bonds), standards
and list of third party verifiers by Climate Bond Initiative, Principles
for Responsible Investment and Centre for International Climate and
Environmental Research (CICERO) etc. These are, however, voluntary
guidelines and still in the development stage.
For a healthy development of the green bond market,
there must a clearer and more consistent understanding of definitions
and standards including impact assessments, reporting etc. As the
Economist rightly notes "it needs to strike a balance between
accepting anything (diluting the attraction of green bonds as
instruments to diversify climate risk) and being so strict that hardly
anyone can meet the criteria."8
In India, PACE-D have further recommended:
• Enhancing the risk liquidity facility to counter
higher costs due to currency fluctuations
• Seeking support from the Green Climate Fund for
risk mitigation products
• Reducing hedging costs via indexing electricity
tariffs to inflation etc.9
Given the trends, it seems that green bonds are here
to stay. Which way they will finally head, it is too early to comment.
q
Mandira Thakur
mandirathakur@gmail.com
Endnotes
1 Climate Policy Initiative, 2012, "Meeting India’s Renewable
Energy Targets: The Financing Challenge"
2 Climate Bonds Initiative, 2014, "Bonds and Climate
Change: The State of the Market 2014"
3 Bhaskar, U., 2015, "India plans push for green bonds",
Mint
4 ibid
5 Grene, S., 2015, "The dark side of green bonds",
Financial Times
6 Gunther, M., 2014, "Can Green Bonds Bankroll A Clean
Energy Revolution?", Environment 360
7 PACE-D (Partnership to Advance Clean Energy-Development)
Technical Assistance Programme, 2014, "Issue Paper: Green Bonds in
India"
8 Economist, 2014, "Green grow the markets, O"
[online]
9 PACE-D (Partnership to Advance Clean Energy-Development)
Technical Assistance Programme, 2014, "Issue Paper: Green Bonds in
India"
Back to Contents |