Unleashing Grassroots Entrepreneurship
Through Collaborative Institutional Ecosystems
India
is among the youngest countries in the world, with 67% of its population
of 1400 million in the working age group. By 2030, another 100 million
people are expected to seek gainful employment in the country [1]. Thus,
India is witnessing one of the highest demographic dividends in the
world and has an unprecedented opportunity to develop and grow
economically, as reflected in the annual GDP increase from 6% to 8%
between 2010 and 2020. And yet, India’s rapid and consistent economic
growth has failed to translate into job opportunities for its 48 million
unemployed citizens [2], making jobless growth one of the most pressing
concerns for the country. Over and above that, tens of millions more are
caught in a web of disguised unemployment, underemployment, or tenuous
and undignified work.
Over the years, grassroots entrepreneurship has emerged as a response to
the rapidly changing paradigm of employment in India and an avenue for
local, opportunity-driven, and dignified employment, especially for
women and youth who have been the most vulnerable to the changes in the
macroeconomy shocks. The evolution of these enterprises has, however,
been constrained by a complex set of challenges, which includes access
to critical resources and gender and societal barriers, among many
other factors that hinder the growth of entrepreneurship.
Moreover, the growth in entrepreneurial activity in India has been far
from uniform. On the one hand, the country is shining as an example of
entrepreneurship, with the growth rate of enterprise set-up being almost
10% annually. On the other hand, many young individuals and women
aspiring to become entrepreneurs, especially in rural communities, are
being left behind. While 83% [3] of the Indian workforce aspires to
become entrepreneurs, only 5% [4] are able to cross the threshold of
establishing businesses; one of the lowest rates in the world.
Several attempts have been made by enterprise development agencies to
bridge the existing gaps, but the lack of collaboration and deep silos
that exist among the available infrastructure, government programmes,
and support services have not been adequately addressed. Dependence on
government schemes and affiliated service providers perpetuates one-way,
top-down flows and relationships in enterprise development projects and
programmes. Civil society initiatives offer more comprehensive support
but are negligible in terms of their impact.
The Emergence of Entrepreneurial Ecosystem
There is a need to build a conducive social and economic environment in
rural India, more commonly known as an ‘entrepreneurial ecosystem’. The
aim of such an ecosystem is to enable aspiring individuals to take up
entrepreneurship opportunities. This ecosystem comprises actors such as
government institutions, grassroots implementation agencies, private
entities, innovators, and businesses, having different attributes,
decision principles, and beliefs that bring together specialised yet
complementary resources for orchestrated efforts to make setting up and
running successful enterprises easier. They are responsible for building
bridges between a large number of entrepreneurs active at the microlevel
and influential, resource-rich macro-level agencies. This necessitates
the need to build a new kind of shared ‘institutional infrastructure’
that can understand local socio-economic imperatives, share relevant
insights, and support multi-stakeholder action to co-create strategies
for long-term resilience in the economy along with an intense focus on
empowerment, livelihood security, and entrepreneurship.
Through initiatives led by Development Alternatives such as the
Work4Progress programme, human-centred tools
and prototypes have been co-created with rural communities to 'poke' the
ecosystem into removing barriers to entrepreneurship in regions of their
operation. One such prototype is the District Entrepreneurship
Coalition (DEC). It is designed with the objective to establish
linkages amongst actors, working in the space of entrepreneurship, and
channelise and optimise the efforts and resources of multiple
stakeholders towards the common goal of job creation through enterprise
development. The key stakeholders of this initiative include government
agencies such as the District Industries Centre, National Rural
Livelihood Mission, Agriculture Department, Department of Horticulture; financial institutes including the National Bank for Agriculture
and Rural Development, banks, NGOs, microfinance institutions;
market aggregators; training institutes including Rural Self Employment
Training Institutes; universities; and, most importantly, entrepreneurs.
A Pathway for Two-way Communication
What started as informal meetings in 2017 to facilitate pathways of
cooperation eventually grew into a robust platform in the Mirzapur
district of Uttar Pradesh by the end of 2022. Development Alternatives,
along with its implementation partners SVSS and MDSS, facilitated the
initial coalition meetings to take the conversations beyond
individualistic challenges, journeys, projects, and schemes, and foster
a sense of collaboration among the members. Over the next two years, the
discourse changed from its initial suggestive or advisory tone about
what an entrepreneurship development agency such as Development
Alternatives should do, to action-oriented discussions about the role
that coalition members should play, collaboratively, in making
entrepreneurship more accessible in Mirzapur.
The transitions in stakeholder behaviour that emerged in Mirzapur took
years of manoeuvring for it to become a means for two-way communication
and eventually take the shape of a ‘model coalition’, with 25
stakeholders forming the core committee. The resultant ecosystem has
enabled the establishment of 909 enterprises in four years, which
lead to the creation of 3418 jobs across a small area of only 50
villages in Mirzapur. Additionally, the interconnectedness between
different actors of the ecosystem led to a reduction in the average time
to set up an enterprise from three months to just three weeks, ergo
significantly boosting the rate of setting up enterprises.
Advantages of Systemic Prototypes
Systemic prototypes such as the DEC have
proved to be a breakthrough for influencing behaviour and driving
policy-level shifts. Some of the most significant changes have been on
account of improved access to credit, information, market exposure,
and other critical inputs for entrepreneurial success. With multiple
microfinance institutions, non-banking financial companies, and banks
providing timely credit support at competitive interest rates, the
negotiating power has shifted into the hands of entrepreneurs. They now
have a plethora of choices to make use of credit support. The changing
credit landscape has led to a five-fold increase in access to credit
support in the last three years across seven districts, with credit
worth INR 40 million leveraged by 1000+ entrepreneurs. The solidarity
developed among local financial stakeholders has also influenced change
in the norms of microfinance institutions and mainstream banks, either
in the form of reducing interest rates or in increasing the loan
duration.
Similar breakthroughs have been seen in
enhanced access to business information and market exposure. Based on
the survey by Development Intelligence Unit (DIU) and Development
Alternatives in 2022, only 8.1% of 2061 entrepreneurs surveyed reported
access to business information. Over the last five years, the DEC
platform has attained a status of an information hub by bringing
together information from more than 15 sectors on the table. It has also
enabled entrepreneurs to expand their reach way beyond the boundaries of
their villages through trade fairs, exports, and e-commerce platforms.
The effectiveness of the DEC prototype
compares favourably with linear top-down enterprise development
programmes, which, more often than not, lack comprehensiveness in
response to a potential entrepreneur’s needs, creating major gaps within
institutional support structures and mechanisms for entrepreneurship.
The results of the ‘ecosystem-building’ approach are evident in a 90%
reduction in the cost of setting up each enterprise to INR 11,500 for
external support agencies such as Development Alternatives in the last
five years. It also offers an alternative to the aggregator approach
in which, most commonly, a social entrepreneur or government agency
provides ‘market linkages’, thus creating a long-term dependency on the
aggregator.
As an enabler of systemic change, the DEC
prototype underlines the need for innovation in ‘collaborative
institutional ecosystems’ to bring about shifts in the behaviour
exhibited by various actors, as a means for building synergies between
initiatives, stakeholders, and entrepreneurs themselves. It is now ready
for replication and has been introduced to stakeholders by Development
Alternatives and Transforming Rural India Foundation (TRIF) as part of
the Uttar Pradesh State Rural Livelihoods Mission’s initiatives in three
blocks of Basti, Bahraich, and Lakhimpur districts.
References
1.
Bhargava, Y. 2022. India's GDP can grow to $40 trillion if
working-age population gets employment: CII Report. The Hindu.
2.
CMIE. n.d. Unemployment in India - A Statistical Profile.
3.
Randstad Holding. 2017. Global Report Randstad Workmonitor wave 2,
2017 nv. Details available at Randstad Workmonitor Q2 - June 2017,
last accessed on 3 January 2023.
4.
Shukla, S., N. S. C. S. Chatwal, P. Bharti, A. K. D. K. Dwivedi,
and V. Shashtri. (n.d.). (rep.). Global Entrepreneurship Report
2018/2019. London; Routledge .
Shrashtant Patara
spatara@devalt.org
Supriya Shukla
sshukla1@devalt.org
Muskan Chawla
mchawla@devalt.org
Back to Contents
|