Impact of Natural Farming Cropping System on Rural Households: Evidence
from Khajraha Khurd Village
of Jhansi District of Uttar Pradesh, India
Natural
farming, also known as zero-budget natural farming, is an innovative
farming approach in which crops are grown with very less input. This
low-cost farming system is climate resilient too. The article discusses
the different cropping forms of natural farming systems and their
benefits in comparison to conventional farming systems. Research results
indicate that natural farming increases net returns, especially in the
vegetable cropping system where the reduction in the cost is 40% (Kharif)
and 20% (Rabi) across all crop combinations in comparison to the
conventional farming system. The vegetable-based cropping system has 20%
more net return in the Kharif season and 29% more net return during the
Rabi season as compared to the conventional farming system. It has been
also found that natural farming maximises land use and reduces the
chances of crop yield loss. Apart from natural farming being cost-saving
because of not using chemical fertilisers and pesticides, intercropping
also benefits the land.
With the objective of promoting natural farming in Babina, Development
Alternatives started an initiative in Khajraha Khurd Village. Under this
initiative, it supported farmers by providing them
with training and the required machinery, so that they could adopt
sustainable farming. Adopting natural farming would improve the soil
fertility in their lands, decrease the cost of the farming system, and
increase the farmers’ income. As mentioned earlier, natural farming is a
different form of agriculture that does not require any financial
capital to purchase essential inputs such as seeds, fertilisers, plant
protection chemicals, and other inputs related to farming.
Selection of the Area and Farmers
Khajraha Khurd village is part of Development Alternatives' existing
NABARD Watershed project. It is a revenue village and belongs to the
Babina block of the Jhansi district. Primary data were collected from
farmers practicing natural farming and conventional farming systems here
for comparative analysis.
Practising Natural Farming According to
Their Size of Landholding
For the analysis of the data, the total respondents were divided
according to the size of their landholdings into three classes: marginal
(<1 ha), small (1–2 ha), and medium (2–4 ha). The distribution of the
sampled farmers is given in Table 1.
Table 1: Distribution of Sampled Households According to Landholding
S. No. |
Category of Farmers |
No of Farmers |
Average
Size of Landholding (Ha) |
1 |
Marginal (<1 ha) |
3 |
0.6 |
2 |
Small
(1-2 ha) |
5 |
1.4 |
3 |
Medium
(2-4 ha) |
8 |
3.2 |
Season-Wise Major Crop Combinations
under Natural Farming System
In a natural farming system, two to four crops are cultivated
together on the same plot. Leguminous crops as also grown as intercrop
to ensure that no part of the land is wasted, and the entire land is
utilised properly. These combinations during the growing season are
established to encourage interaction between the different plants and is based on the
idea that complementarities exist between the plants. Intercropping with
the leguminous crop is considered one of the very important parts of
natural farming as it increases crop productivity and soil fertility
through atmospheric nitrogen fixation. It also introduces
diversification and improves profits by growing various types of
cereals, vegetables, legumes, and fruit plants. The mixed cropping
system enhances income and balances soil fertility.
Comparative Analysis of Natural Farming
System and Conventional Farming System
As two to four crops are cultivated on the same farmland under the
natural farming system. it is easy to equate natural farming economic
produce with conventional farming. Compared to conventional farming,
crop production per plant is high in the natural farming system.
Moreover, the conventional farming system
currently faces multiple challenges such as a decrease in productivity,
inappropriate use of nutrients, poor nutrient quality, depletion of
water, and increased input costs. Figure 1 gives a comparative analysis
of conventional and natural farming systems.
Figure 1: Comparative analysis of
conventional and natural farming systems
Conclusion
Intercropping with leguminous crops is considered one of the advantages
of natural farming as it increases crop productivity and soil fertility
through atmospheric nitrogen fixation. The adoption of the natural
farming system in Khajraha Khurd village revealed that farmers witnessed
lower cost of production and a better profitable yield for their crops.
The farmers were pleased that the natural farming system is
environmentally friendly and extremely cost-effective. The crop
equivalent yield under natural farming was highest in all the crop
combinations as compared to the conventional farming system.
Rishabh Singh
rsingh@devalt.org
Back to Contents
|