| 
         
         
        Scope of Interventions for LC3 in Existing Government Policies  
  
        
        
        Infrastructure 
        development is widely acknowledged as the key to achieving growth. It 
        has been the primary focus area for the Government of India, and it is 
        reflected in its current policies and plans. The government has set out 
        to achieve ambitious goals of becoming a 5 trillion USD economy by the 
        end of 2024, which is important for the cement industry as it paves the 
        way for infrastructural development and lays the foundation for building 
        a new India (Thomas, 2020). 
        
        Our country’s cement production is the 
        second-largest globally, with an overall production capacity of nearly 
        545 million tonnes (MT) for 2020. With the growing population, more 
        reliable infrastructure is becoming an absolute necessity. Apart from 
        that, it is an essential product that is utilised by all industries and 
        forms a solid backbone for advancement and acceleration of 
        socio-economic growth. It provides a large number of direct and indirect 
        employment opportunities, contributing in a big way to the GDP. 
        
        To continue this positively advancing 
        trajectory, one needs to consciously look out for greener alternatives 
        that can be easily incorporated without disrupting the system. LC3 
        has the potential to become a greener alternate solution that promises 
        sustainable growth in terms of economies, ecological stewardship, 
        shareholder value creation, and community well-being worldwide. It 
        reduces carbon dioxide emissions up to 40% as compared to ordinary 
        portland cement. That is possible due to the change in the composition 
        of the raw materials, as LC3’s primary raw material is 40–65% 
        clinker, 30–38% calcined clay, 15% crushed limestone, and 7% gypsum. It 
        utilises lower grade clay, which is usually abandoned and left to the 
        agents of erosion, thus creating value. 
        
        Additionally, the energy requirement for 
        calcination in LC3 production is half of what is needed to 
        manufacture ordinary cement. Because of the softer nature of materials, 
        necessary power required for grinding is reduced, making it more 
        cost-effective to produce. It is a development that could gain momentum 
        quickly due to high availability of limestone and low-grade clay in 
        India. It does not require capital-intensive modification in existing 
        plants. The accompanying graph visualises the production trend for 
        different varieties of cement, along with the introduction of LC3 
        in 2025. 
        
          
        
        Source: Author’s analysis 
        At the 26th 
        Conference of Parties (COP26) held in Glasgow in late 2021, Prime 
        Minister Narendra Modi promised that India would achieve net-zero 
        emission by 2070. In the meantime, our government also pledged to meet 
        immediate goals, which would help in facilitating the larger target. 
        Among the immediate goals for 2030 are receiving assistance to increase 
        India’s non-fossil fuel energy capacity, meeting 50% of the country’s 
        energy requirement through renewable, reducing CO2 emissions 
        by 1 billion tonnes, and bringing down the carbon intensity of India’s 
        economy by more than 45%. Reaching these momentous milestones would 
        enable India to pave a firmer path towards decarbonisation. It would 
        eventually lead India to emerge as a world leader, not just in taking 
        action but also in creating technology and finding low-cost alternatives 
        for the adaptation-related issue, which is looming today. 
        Keeping in 
        mind the points mentioned above and our team’s progress with LC3, 
        we at Development Alternatives approached the Director of the Ministry 
        of Mines, Vivek Kumar Sharma. Our discussion there was extensive, and we 
        gained insights into the organisation’s working. 
        While LC3 
        is our best possible alternative to mitigate emissions, its large-scale 
        adoption is highly dependent on how the governmental nodal organisations 
        incorporate it into various policies not only to make it mandatory for 
        the cement manufacturers but also to increase its social acceptance. For 
        increasing awareness and social acceptance of alternative cement, 
        government infrastructure and public sector undertaking (PSUs) would be 
        ideal testing grounds. That can provide impetus to the public at large 
        to adopt such greener alternatives. Supporting the transition of 
        domestic cement manufacturing to low-carbon cement would ensure that the 
        sector would keep 0.54 million jobs in 2050 and zero import dependency 
        on the limestone imports (Biswas, Ganesan, & Ghosh 2019).  
         
        
        References: 
        
        
        
          - 
          
Biswas, T., 
          Ganesan, K., and Ghosh, A. 2019. CEEW. Accessed on 25 March, 2022 at 
          at https://www.ceew.in/sites/default/files/CEEW%20-%20Sustainable%20manufacturing%20in%20a%20low 
          carbon%20economy%2024Sep19.pdf  
          - 
          
Thomas, E. 
          2020. World cement. Accessed on 25 March, 2022 at 
          https://www.worldcement.com/indian-subcontinent/13012020/india-cements-its-future/    
 
        
        
        
        
        Sumedha Singh 
        
        
        ssingh2@devalt.org 
        
        
        
        
        
        Back to Contents 
        
        
        
         |