.
The decrease is substantial but ensuring food security for all the
people of the world is still a challenge with there being many who
suffer from chronic or transitory food insecurity, especially in the
developing and least developed countries. According to the Food and
Agriculture Organisation, about 1.3 billion tonnes per year or one-third
of the edible food produced for human consumption is wasted along the
food supply chain. While developed countries are responsible for
humongous food waste in their lifestyle habits, developing and least
developed countries lack proper infrastructure and resources resulting
in leakages and food loss.
The UNEP-Development Alternatives project on ‘Policy
Analysis of Natural Resource Issues on SDGs’ has identified interesting
linkages among various policy scenarios of efficient natural resource
management. The study shows that ambitious environmental SDGs are
attainable and tradeoffs manageable only if sustainable consumption and
production policies are integrated as necessary conditions for broad SDG
implementation. One of the case stands that dietary policy-shift will
not just support in nourishing the growing population but shall also
prevent the inefficient expenditure of finite resources. This article
elaborates on the impact that dietary shifts can have on the overall
food security and efficient natural resource use.
A major challenge to food security comes from its
conflict with desired environmental outcomes. Restricted land use
change, on one hand, mitigates destruction of
natural forests and GHG emissions and increases ground water for
agriculture. However, it causes increase in food prices and decreases
food availability among vulnerable population due to limited land
available for agriculture and thus restricting the overall crop
production. Restricted land use change, evidently supports natural
resource management but raises challenges to food security. This general
tension between environmental conservation initiatives and food security
presents a major obstacle to the pursuit of multiple SDGs and must be
central to any strategy for SDG implementation.
For the system to achieve desirable environmental
outcomes as well as ensure food security, land is the competing resource
between the two aims. At present, it looks like a trade off where either
of the two shall supersede the other. It is also to be noticed that any
alternative action that depressurises the system and thus increases the
net availability of land, water and food shall generate positive
outcomes to both -environmental systems and food security. 
Meat demand growth, especially in affluent and
emerging countries puts immense pressure on the land resource and thus
proves to be environmentally costly. Meat production is a land intensive
activity, thus pressurises the land system due to grazing and other
poultry needs in the production mechanism.
A shift to a vegetarian diet and an adequate change
in the lifestyle of meat consumers of the world substantially would
relieve land for other purposes, depressurising the natural systems on
the whole. Such a shift in the consumption pattern towards a more
sustainable consumption has the potential to bring synergies in the goal
of food security and environmental well-being. If ambitiously formulated
and rigorously implemented, this can lead towards the achievement of
longer term goals as formulated in the Rio convention. Beyond land,
water and feed implications, excess consumption of animal calories is
associated with negative health outcomes such as obesity and other
health problems in the developed countries