Bridging Information Gap:
Livelihood Campaign in Bundelkhand
Bridging the
information gap has emerged as an integral part of the development
process. It talks about engagement where all the participants are key
members in the development process and not mere spectators. Increasingly
the need for two-way communication process to understand community needs
and package relevant knowledge for community empowerment has become very
important.
Bridging information gap is about designing and
implementing communication-based strategies to influence change in a
desired direction and for that there is need to understand the
socio-economic and cultural practices of the communities. It is also
important to look at triggers than can influence behaviour change.
Bridging information gap is used in various programmes to
scale up development initiatives that have proved to be successful.
Communication mediums vary from digital medium to traditional mediums of
communication such as community radio, films, power point presentations,
street plays, community melas, wall paintings etc. Various issues are
addressed and awareness is being created with the help of such mediums.
Livelihoods in India
The Indian economy recorded a fairly high GDP growth rate
of 7.2% during 1998-2008. However, this high rate of GDP growth did not
translate into inclusive livelihood opportunities for the rural poor. In
reality, it adversely impacted the rural poor due to various structural
changes in the last ten years. The share of primary sector in the GDP
declined from 26% to 17.5% between 1998 and 2008, even as the share of
rural population, which was dependent on this sector remained the same.
This has adversely impacted the livelihood of 98 million small and
marginal farm households.
It is important to ensure that those who remain in
agriculture are made efficient and competitive. It is equally important
to promote occupational mobility of the rural poor, which is dependent
on agriculture and allied activities to attain more gainful off-farm
enterprises or employment. Linking communities with information and
knowledge about the possible diverse economic opportunities is critical
in improving their access to viable sustainable livelihood options that
could be achieved with Bridging Information Gap (BIG).
Development Alternatives’ Strategy
Development Alternatives (DA) has been working for more
than 30 years in rural Bundelkhand, one of the poorest and most backward
regions in the country. DA has designed and implemented communication
strategies on various issues to bring about development changes in the
communities and bridge the knowledge gap. The organisation uses both
‘communication for results’ and ‘communication of results’ as part of
its strategy. Bridging Information Gap (BIG) is used as a tool to
communicate issues and concerns of the society besides addressing
possible solutions for the same.
In order to reach a larger group, BIG module is designed
to impart knowledge on topics such as Employability, Entrepreneurship,
Apprenticeship, Gender Empowerment, Nutrition, WASH and various
government schemes. The module is designed in a community friendly
manner. It ensures continuous engagement with the target group.
Monitoring and evaluation mechanisms are designed to analyse pre and
post intervention knowledge level of the target group.
Bridging Information Gap - Livelihood Campaign
The economy of the economically backward Bundelkhand
region in Central India predominantly relies on agriculture and the
community is poorly linked to other sources and options for sustainable
livelihoods. This increases their vulnerability and ability to break out
of persistent poverty. Linking communities with information and
knowledge about the possible diverse economic opportunities is critical
in improving their access to viable sustainable livelihood options.
Community Based Organisations (CBOs) engaged in rural development
interventions in the region can play an important role in increasing the
access of communities to information, knowledge resources, support
services and skills on a range of livelihood opportunities available in
the region. The livelihood resource agencies from the private sector,
civil society and public sector are also using different communication
methods to reach the rural audience.
The Livelihood campaign was led in association with six
CBOs of Bundelkhand region. The aim was to build appropriate content on
livelihood options for the region, disseminate this content using a
variety of communication methods and also link communities with local
institutions that provide knowledge, skill building, credit support and
technical support for new livelihood opportunities.
A baseline survey was conducted with 3000 respondents in
five districts of Bundelkhand to identify the livelihood opportunities
and needs. Grassroots communication modes such as community radio,
street plays and local fairs were identified as the optimum outreach
methods. Audio modules were developed on livelihood and entrepreneurship
opportunities and on support services such as skill building, government
training schemes and bank credit facilities.
Training workshops were organised to build capacities of
CBOs to collect and package information on livelihoods and support
services. Interactions with livelihood experts from the Development
Alternatives Group helped in developing the content and identifying the
‘communication hook’ for each module that would be developed to bridge
the information gap on livelihood issue.
These communication modules have been disseminated in the
five districts of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh reaching a population
of approximately 1,200,000 individuals. They have further been used for
direct discussion through narrow casting followed by FGD sessions
between the community and experts. The CBOs were also assisted to reach
out to youth groups in NRLM job and livelihood fairs.
With the help of the campaign 3 lakh families across 2200
villages were reached. The outcome of the dissemination is now being
studied and feedback is being collected to understand how the community
has used the information, what are new demands for knowledge and links
and whether the intervention catalysed action on new livelihood
creation.
■
|