| Busy bees in the summertimeJeffrey Mc
  Neely, Chief Conservation Officer at the World Conservation Union (IUCN) in
  Gland, Switzerland, dwelt on the busy bodies at the UNCED PrepCom in the
  Network ‘92 No.7, June 1991.
 
 
 The UNCED
  PrepCom process resembles a beehive in a meadow in the middle of summer.
  Everybody is busy, the corridors are a buzz with talk of sustainable
  development, diplomats are launching themselves on important missions to other
  hives, a thousand flowery new ideas are blooming, new international agreements
  are being pollinated, and information is flowing hither and yon. By the end of
  summer a beehive produces honey and wax. But the UNCED negotiations often seem
  to resemble too many drones chasing one elusive queen.
 In its influential 1987 report, the World Commission on Environment and
  Development called for greatly improved international cooperation. This seems
  to have led primarily to ever-growing numbers of international meetings and
  lots of work for the international consulting community. The danger is that
  international cooperation is often aimed at more and more sophisticated ways
  of exploiting natural resources (called "rationalising sustainable use of
  resources"), not in conserving them. The benefits of over-exploitation
  flow especially to the international consumers, who gain the benefit of
  steadily growing supplies of raw materials to feed their voracious appetites
  for "essentials ". The honey is not staying in the local hive, but
  is flowing to distant markets.
 
 Meanwhile, the only future for the worker bees in the country side is more
  work.
 
 While increasing the amounts of foreign exchange available to the developing
  countries is a commonly quoted objective of UNCED negotiations, the resulting
  exploitation of resources for the benefit of the international market also has
  costs. The international costs - climate change, pollution, species loss - are
  well recognised by UNCED, and are the subject of seemingly endless
  negotiations (often notable for lack of hard data on which to negotiate, and
  fundamental disagreements abut how to interpret the data that exist). But even
  greater costs are paid by the local people whose resources are being
  over-exploited; while the international market can move on to other sources of
  supply, the local communities must adapt to the resources available. They are
  often put in the position where they must over-exploit their own environment
  in order to meet their daily needs and the demands of a voracious external
  market.
 
 This is doubly ironic for the local communities - those who would earn the
  direct benefits from using their local resources in a sustainable way-are also
  sometimes the victims of conservation. When national parks, for example, do
  not recognise the needs of the local communities, conflict is inevitable. What
  can be done to enable to earn the benefit of sustainable use? Responses
  include : more complete evaluations of the real cost of exploiting resources;
  greater participation by local communities in decisions on both conservation
  and resource exploitation; more complete sharing of information; more
  effective drawing on local knowledge in management programmes; great
  responsibility for local communities in managing the resources upon which
  their welfare depends.
 
 While the international negotiations continue, local communities remain the
  units that are adapting to the real-life condition on the ground.
 
 And who speaks for the local communities at UNCED? What response can be
  expected to result form Rio? More bees in people’s bonnets, more sticky
  fingers on the hands of exploiters, or at long last some real honey for the
  rural people whose welfare depends directly upon sustainable forms of using
  resources?
 
 By the end of summer a beehive produced honey and wax. But the UNCED
  negotiations often seem to resemble too many drones chasing one elusive queen.
 
 It is apparent that the real sources of power in this world - governments and
  the corporate sector - are advocating more exploitation of resources, often at
  rates that ecologist consider unsustainable in the long term. While this is
  often cloaked with tokens of environmental concern and words like
  "sustainable development," the on-the-ground reality is something
  far different. Local communities are losing power over their own lives, and
  governments - both North and South - want them to produce more food, raw
  materials, and products for the world marketplace, even when local ecosystems
  are already suffering form over-exploitation. the outcome is often predictably
  tragic.
 
 Virtually the only voices being heard on behalf of true sustainability for
  local communities come from various NGOs. Conservation NGOs argue that
  protecting biodiversity is crucial to sustainable development; development
  NGOs argue for empowerment of rural communities, especially on behalf of the
  minorities. All of these are finding common ground in forms of development
  which are aimed at maintaining healthy ecosystems that can be managed by local
  communities for their own benefit.
 
 The local expression of sustainable forms of development will vary greatly
  from place to place, reflecting different cultures, climate, history, and
  natural resources. This diversity of approaches to sustainability is to be
  applauded. Local communities need appropriate encouragement and practical
  support to build self-reliance, to adapt to changing conditions, to utilize
  their local assets in ways that make sense to local needs.
 
 Governments of North and South are squabbling over who gets what share of
  honey, but the far more important question for the future welfare of humanity
  is how to enable rural communities to develop sustainable forms of adapting to
  changing conditions.
 
 See you round the honey pot.
 
 The ‘ 92 Global Forum
 
 The ‘ 92 Global Forum
  which will be jointly coordinated by the Brazilian NGO forum and the
  International Facilitating Committee (IFC) is intended to be a series of
  events, which provide an apportunity for all sectors to express their
  independent views in Rio de Janeiro at the time of the Earth Summit.
 
 Also included within the framework of the ‘ 92 Global Forum will be
  individual events planned by women, youth , indigenous people and others as
  well as an " Intersectoral Summit’ planned by the IFC. These meetings
  and exhibitions will provide an opportunity for various sectors of society to
  share with each other their recommendations to governments and their own plans
  of action for the 21st century.
 
 The site for the ‘ 92 Global Forum will be the area surrounding the Gloria
  Hotel in rio, which encompasses the historical centre of Rio (where conference
  facilities and hotel accommodation are being arranged) and the Flamengo Park
  (which will be the venue for exhibitions, informal meetings and other suitable
  outdoor activities including live transmission by television of UNCED itself.)
  The headquartes for the Gloria Forum, including registration, travel and
  accommodation facilities and communication centre will be located at the
  Gloria Hotel in Rio, Which encompasses the historical centre of rio (where
  conference facilities and hotel accommodation are being arranged) and the
  Flamengo park (which will be the venue for exhibitions, informal meetings and
  other suitable outdoor activities including live transmission by television of
  UNCED itself.) the headquarters for the Gloria Forum, including registration,
  travel and accommodation facilities and communication centre will be located
  at the Gloria Conference Centre adjacent to the Gloria Hotel.
 
 For planning the individual events of the independent sector organisations,
  during the Earth Summit, the Global Forum coordinators have opened an office
  in Rio at the following address :
 
 International
  Facilitating Committee
 Hotel Gloria, prei
  Anexo, Sala 366
 Rua do Russel, 632
 22212, rio de janeiro
 Brazil
 Tel : 5563030
 Fax : 2054114
 telex: 2141201 GLFO
 
 Desks and operational support are available in the Global Forum for all
  independent sector organisations planning events in Rio next June.
  Organisations interested in securing a desk in the Global Forum’s office
  should contact the office directly.
 
 All equipment and facilities for the Global Forum’s office including
  telephones, faxes, telexes, computers, moderns, photocopiers and furnitures
  have been secured as contributions to a corporate sponsorship programme
  organised between the Global Forum coordinators and the commercial association
  of Rio de Janeiro represented by Mr. Paulo Protasio.
 
 All indoor conference facilities within a 15-minute radius of the Gloria Hotel
  and the Conference Centre have been blocked by the brazilian Government for
  use by groups and organisations planning events as part of the Global Forum.
 
 Exhibition booths are also available in Flamengo Park where materials and
  goods can be shown and/or sold. Requests for meeting space (either indoor or
  outdoor) and exhibition booths in Flamengo Park should be directed to the
  Global Forum’s office in Rio.
 
 To facilitate participation in the Global Forum, the Global Forum coordinators
  will assist with accommodation and travel arrangement. Those interested in
  securing accommodation in Rio next June, whether individually or as a group,
  should contact the Global Forum’s office at the earliest possible date.
 
 For details, please contact the Global Forum Office in Rio.
 
 Meeting with the Minister
 
    
    
      
        | Events planned for the
  ‘ 92 Global Forum 
 Some of the events
  planned for the ‘92 Global Forum are :
 
 1992 Global Youth Summit
 
 Symposium on Spiritual, Ethical and Policy issues in Environment and
  Development
 
 Workshop on Environmental Law
 
 Workshop on Consumer Issues
 
 Workshop on Biotechnology
 
 Workshop on Environmental Education
 
 Workshop on Women and Environment
 
 Workshop on ‘Building of the New World’
 
 Seminar on Renewable Energy Strategies
 | On 1st August 1991,
  Shri Kamal Nath, the new Minister of Environment, invited a number of
  independent sector organizations to share their respective views on
  environmental questions facing the nation. The participants at the meeting
  included Dr. Karan Singh (PCED), Dr. M. S. Swaminathan (WWF & MSSF), Dr.
  T. N. Khoshoo (NAS), Ashok Khosla (Development Alternatives), R. K. pachauri
  (TERI), Kartikeya Sarabhai (CEE), Anil Agarwal (CSE), Kirit Parikh (IGIDR),
  Shekhar Singh (IIPA), Vandana Dhiva (Third World Network) and others. The
  Minister was accompanied by senior officials of the Ministry of Environment
  and Forests including Shri R. Rajamani, Secretary, Shri Samar Singh,
  Additional Secretary and Shri Mukul Sanwal; Joint Secretary. Officials were
  present also from the Ministry of External Affairs and the Planning
  Commission. 
 Voluntary organization representatives set forth their views on various
  environmental problems. The Minister was receptive to suggestions on improved
  interactions between independent sector organizations and his Ministry and
  invited participants to evolve ways aimed further improving cooperation among
  them.
 
 The Minister was particularly interested in ensuring the most effective
  possible representation of independent sector organizations from India at the
  UNCED Conference at Rio in June 1992. He felt that no only would this be
  important for supplementing the role of the official Indian delegation in a
  positive manner and in exposing a large number of Indian NGOs to global issues
  which might become important for the future, but also for establishing
  influential channels of communication with northern NGOs who, in turn, can
  influence their own respective national policies. he encouraged PCED,
  Development Alternatives and others to work out various ways in which the
  national input to UNCED could be of the highest quality. He promised further
  dialogue with the independent sector in the near future.
 |  UNCED UpdateGet accredited now! time is running out
 
 The last PrepCom in
  Geneva which ended on the 4th September decided that only those
  representatives of the Independent sectors which are accredited to the prepCom
  by the end of its fourth and final session in New york will be invited to
  attend the conference in Rio de Janeiro. The final PrepCom ends on April 3,
  1992, so if you are not already accredited to UNCED, you should do so as soon
  as possible. (It is important to note that you do not have to attend the
  PrepCom meetings in order to get accreditation.)
 
 PrepCom grants accreditation to those organisations of the independent sectors
  that are able to prove their "competence and relevance" regarding
  the issues being discussed by UNCED. To help it make a decision about any
  given organisation, the PrepCom has asked the UNCED secretariat to make
  recommendations for accreditation. In order for the secretariat to make its
  judgement on which organisations to accredit, the secretariat requires the
  following information from interested groups and organisations :
 
 
    
    
      
        | - | a copy of the latest annual
      report or a copy of the statutes of establishment and other relevant
      information demonstrating that the organisation is a legally registered
      non-profit organisation; |  
        | - | information on governing
      body composition (if not already included in the annual report), a
      description of membership and location of headquarters; |  
        | - | a short description of how
      the organisation’s activities relate to UNCED
    Include the
    above information with a sheet detailing your address, telephone no. etc.
    The sooner you apply the better the chances of being accredited at the next
    PrepCom! |  
 Contact :UNCED,
    B.P. 80, CH-1213 Conches, Switzerland, Tel. (41-220 789 1676, Fax . 789 35
    36.
 Back
  to Contents
    
  
      
     |