Model Watershed:
A Collaborative Approach for Livelihoods
A pproximately
170 million hectares in India are classified as degraded land, roughly
half of which falls in undulating semi-arid areas where rain fed farming
is practiced. Growing efforts by the state and different stakeholders to
reverse this decline are often based on the rehabilitation of micro
watersheds.
The watershed approach aims at
treating degraded lands with the help of low cost and locally accessed
technologies such as in situ water conservation, afforestation etc,
through participatory approach that seeks to secure close involvement of
the user community.
The success of the programs in
dealing with soil and water conservation however leaves much to be
desired. The resources available for watershed development and the
potential for such activities in Bundelkhand are substantial. With
watershed development it is possible to remedy some of the problems
identified in implementation of the watershed programme in the area, it
can serve as an ideal means for enhancing the incomes of the
beneficiaries and productivity of most land based occupations.
Establishing learning Model watershed in
Bundelkhand:
Under the Ministry of
Agriculture, Government of India, sponsored a project to establish nine
Model Integrated watersheds in nine states of India with International
Crop Research Institute of Semi Arid tropics (ICRISAT) Hyderabad. The
ICRISAT formed a consortium which includes Development Alternatives (DA)
and National Research Centre on Agro forestry Jhansi (NRCAF) to
facilitate the process of establishing Model watershed in in Jhansi
District of Bundelkhand region.
The primary aim of the
consortium was towards Conservation of natural resources specially land
and water and to facilitate the sustainable source of livelihood through
continuous farm based researches. On the basis of criteria mentioned in
Common Guidelines (GOI, 2008) The watershed identified on the basis of
scientific validity and feasibility by expert from ICRISAT, NRCAF and DA
guidance, Jhansi district of Uttar Pradesh state has been selected to
improve rural livelihood activities through participatory watershed
development programme with consortium approach.
Consortium for participatory
watershed management: Under the Common
Guideline (GOI, 2008) model watershed approach focus in Bundelkhand
region with the association of multi-stakeholders like ICRISAT as a
nodal agency of Government of India for customized technical and
infrastructural support and trainings to consortium partners as well as
financing too, Development Alternatives (DA) for field level planning’s,
strengthening of community institutions, liaison and leveraging with
other Governmental schemes and National Research Centre on Agro-forestry
(NRCAF) for scientific and technical support and site specific
researches.
Consortium of partners is
reaching out to the region as a model of integrated genetic and natural
resource management and support to the farmers in choosing appropriate
cropping sequence and matching crop rotation with the soil profile and
changing rainfall patterns helped minimize the impact of drought.
Objectives :
•
Improve rural livelihoods on sustainable basis
through participatory on farm researches
•
Establish model site of learning for semi-arid
area
•
Build capacity of stakeholders
Strategies:
•
Providing appropriate technical inputs for
transforming unproductive farming practices into economically viable
venture
•
Facilitating involvement of village level
institutions and leverage resources through Convergence from Government
and others.
Knowledge-based Entry Point
Activity (KB-EPA):
Based on the learnings from the
Comprehensive Assessment of Watershed Programs in India undertaken by
ICRISAT-led consortium for the project sponsored by the Ministry of
Agriculture (MoA) and Ministry of Rural Development ( MoRD,) The present
programme use KBEPA to build rapport with the community. The consortium
partners to be trained to undertake EPA for strengthening partnership
and promotion of livelihood based on the scientific validation. The main
purpose of KBEPA is to build the sustainability and give a clear signal
to the community that they should not be expecting dole outs from the
project for development of private farms. They will receive a technical
support and advice but not the inputs for the interventions benefiting
individuals. For identification of KBEPA participatory rural (PRA) will
be conducted and based on the severe and important constraint which can
provide tangible economic benefit to the community will be identified
and implemented to build the trust and rapport with the community.
Model watershed approach
coexisted w ith
infrastructural development, conservation & management of natural
resources, promotion of mixed farming practices and need based on farm
researches with appropriate and latest technologies. As a result,
combination of such intervention at door steps of community protects the
community from unexpected losses, increases their risk taking capacities
and enhances their productivity of farm produces. Thus, the strong
backward and forward linkage in easy reach generates the various income
generation opportunities for women and landless families.
Topographic Survey and
Preparation of Geo-referenced Maps: For
the model watershed the member of the consotiunm based on the expertise
available undertake detailed topographic survey using available new
tools in order to undertake scientific planning of the model watershed
development. Based on the topographic features the watershed boundaries
delineated, geo-referenced using the GPS, all the physical water
structures aligned with the GIS maps and in the cadastral maps. Maps
indicating current cropping systems, soils (depth and type), and
constraints will be prepared. These maps will be used for discussion
with the community and will be available as a resource for the villages
covered by the model watershed.
Strenthening of Community-based
Organisations (CBOs): The consortium
partners facilitate the formation of User Groups (UGs) which will be
based on the secondary and tertiary drainage lines. The other approach
of including the voluntary membership in the UGs to ensure
sustainability. The UGs and SHGs (existing) as well as labour groups
will have the representation on the decision making body of the
watershed i.e. Watershed Committee (WC). The process to develop them as
effective CBOs will be a continuing process through training, exposure
visits, and capacity building measures as required. Ground rules for
operating the CBOs will be formulated along with the community. The UGs
will also be encouraged and trained to adopt the good practices of SHGs
to meet regularly and involve in the thrift scheme to help each other in
the group.
In-Situ Moisture Conservation
Measures: Based on the learning at the
ground in order to ensure equity and tangible economic benefits to small
and marginal farmers in-situ conservation of rainwater is a first
activity for harvesting rainwater. Once this is achieved and community
is capacitated for collective action ex-situ rainwater harvesting
initiatives will be taken up. This is important to ensure community
participation and full involvement in planning and execution of the RWH
structures. In-situ soil and moisture conservation measures will be
translated into economic productivity through efficient use of the
conserved natural resources. Based on the soil, rainfall and other
factors suitable landform measures will be evaluated by the farmers and
popularized through PR&D approach.
Establishment of Hydrological
gauging and weather Stations: In model
watersheds runoff, soil loss and nutrient losses is to be recorded for
which hydrological gauging stations and soil loss measurement devices
established. The CBO representatives will be trained in collecting
runoff samples and data from the gauging stations.
Partrticipatory Research and
Development (PR&D) Selection of Crops and Cultivars:
Based on the agro ecological potential and market demand suitable
cultivars of the established crops as well as new crops will be made
available for the farmers to evaluate and select. The PR&D approach will
enable the farmers to select the suitable crops and cultivars by
themselves rather than recommending others. The PR&D approach also is
adopted for the best integrated Nutrient and Pest management trials
taking in to consideration of local resources to be used as sources of
plant nutrient and for biopesticide production. All the PR&D trails
involve large number of farmers ensuring small and marginal farmers are
the beneficiaries. All the trials will be conducted based on
contributions in cash or kind by the participating farmers and efforts
will be made to involve as many farmers as possible during the project
phase.
Rehabilitation of wastelands:
Wastelands or common property resources (CPRs) in the watershed areas
will be rehabilitated through collective action and full involvement of
the Panchayat. With suitable soil and water conservation measures the
CPRs will be rehabilitated using fodder-tree systems. Economical
important and less water requiring plants such as Jatropha and Pongamia
will also be used along with the fodder and fruit trees depending on the
quality of the CPRs.
Participatory Evaluation &
Monitoring: In order to bring in the
transparency in the operations in the watershed development PE&M
approach will be adopted along with the consortium partners. Wall
writing of the results, interventions and expenditure items will be
adopted. The community members will also be involved in participatory
groundwater monitoring as well as recording the yields from the PR&D
trials of INM, IPM, and cultivar selection. PM&E will be a continuous
process to do the mid-course corrections in the interventions as well as
for the approach.
Impact Assessment:
Using detailed baseline data suitable impact assessment methods will be
used to assess the impact. In addition to the regular outputs from the
PE&M, data collected from the trials, gauging stations, remote sensing
pictures HHs surveys data will also be collected to assess the economic
and social impacts. Various case studies to document the impact pathways
for improving the livelihoods will also be undertaken. Not only the
economic and biophysical impacts but also social capital development as
well as institutions and skills development will also be recorded. Most
importantly the principle of internal impact monitoring as a quality
assessment tool will be established.
Capacity Development:
Various methods for capacity development such as exposure visits,
hands-on training, demonstrations, leadership skill development, talking
skills in addition to various watershed activities will be undertaken.
Most importantly the capacity development of the consortium partners as
well as change in the attitude to work in the watersheds amongst the
partners as well as policy makers in the district will be tried.
Specified training courses by the specialized trainers will be
undertaken. Areas like climate change, adapatation strategies, and
biodiversity conservation will also be addressed. Participatory R&D
approaches as well as PM&E of Natural resources is an integral part of
the watershed programme. Policy makers will also be sensitized with the
approaches adopted in the development of model watersheds.
Strategic Research:
In the model watershed strategic research in agricultural production,
wasteland development, value chain, impact assessment as well as
scaling-up activities will be undertaken. Second generation issues
emerging from the watershed development and market forces will be
identified for addressing through suitable research initiatives. Model
watersheds will be used as learning sites for the researchers to
identify the research issues as identified by the communities as well as
to share the research findings with the community and the policy makers.
Conclusion
The success of participatory
watershed development by the different stakeholders judged according to
the extent to which improvements in productivity are both equitable and
sustainable. In the future the major expectation is to strengthen the
capacity of all stakeholders’ communities and the state to implement
programme at a pace compatible with national development imperatives and
the availability of resource. A period of consolidation is called for to
allow implementation capacity to ‘catch up’ with the scale and vision of
the watershed program. q
S N Pandey
and Naresh Sharma
snpandey@devalt.org
nsharma@devalt.org
Back to Contents |