Teaching India to Read Just got a Lot easier Valiant attempts have been made to make India more literate, but with the rise in population, the number of non-literates in the country has also increased in geometric progressions. Officially, only one third of India is not literate. Only one third! That’s well over 300 million people. Recent surveys reveal that the non-literacy rate is probably far higher than this, possibly as high as half the population. The Problem A population that is not literate will not be able to move out of the borderline agricultural existence in which it currently strives to survive. A population that can at least read and write can be trained in vocational skills and has a chance to create a viable economic system where hunger, malnutrition, outrageous child mortality rates, absence of primary health care and education can be addressed.  | Literacy : an effective tool for women empowerment Education | Behind the statistics are two realities – the adults (mostly rural, mostly female) who never learnt to read and never will, and the kids who drop out of school. Half of all Indian school kids drop out of Primary School and of course, most of them have not learnt to read. If they had, there would have been a much better chance for them to continue at school! So, we have to teach millions of adults, and millions of kids who are dropping out, as well as ensure that the kids at school are taught better so that they don’t drop out. Currently, in India, it takes between six months to two years to teach people to read. Multiply that by hundreds of millions. It represents a staggering amount of effort, persistence, patience and manpower to make even the smallest dent. Why be a literate? If the Indian rural population could read, then: ◘ | We could put out health education pamphlets to tell mothers, the reason so many of their kids die before attaining the age of five is because the whole family leads an unhygienic life - they don’t wash their hands, they don’t use toilets, their urination and defecation in the fields acts as a slow poison, and they do not even filter their water before drinking it. | ◘ | We could tell them the difference between a qualified doctor and a quack, and why they should go to a doctor. | ◘ | They would not feel inferior when their kids learn to read. | ◘ | They would know that they should encourage their kids to read, not discourage them. This would make sure children stayed in school and got a decent education. | ◘ | Wives would gain self-respect. A non-literate wife cannot fill in forms, read letters from her family, or write letters to her family. (Most wives on marriage move in to the homes of their in-laws, which are often at a great distance from their own families.) | ◘ | Agricultural workers could learn new and better methods of crop rotation, irrigation and pest control. | ◘ | Agricultural trade would be improved because markets wouldn’t rely on face-to-face transactions with corrupt middlemen. | ◘ | Most importantly, anyone could go on a vocational training course and get a well-paid productive job. | Of course, it wouldn’t solve all of India’s problems. But all of India’s problems will not be solved unless the literacy one is solved. The Solution If we could cut the time and effort it takes to teach an adult non-literate (and kids) how to read in a fraction of the current time, we could then begin to anticipate the sort of literacy levels that most other countries have. Conventional wisdom is that it takes a long time, and the drop-out rates will always be high.  | A courseroom,basic,austere,but they learn | Well, we found a way to slash the conventional reading times. We went back to the basic principles, and constructed a hypothesis, like any good scientist, and tested the hypothesis, and hey presto, it worked! The result was TARA Akshar - our programme to make non-literates learn to read and speak Hindi in the minimum possible time with the least possible effort on part of the learner. Preliminary results indicate that it teaches adults to read in less than a month, and doesn’t need a qualified teacher. All it needs is a computer and a willing instructor, who has had a week’s training. The Genesis The author, an Englishman working for Development Alternatives / TARAhaat in Delhi, was vainly trying to teach himself how to speak Hindi. He found it difficult to remember the meanings of words. So he started experimenting with ancient memory systems used by the Greeks and Romans. He found that by the judicious use of memory techniques, he was able to remember up to 50 new words a day. Then he started to learn to read Hindi (or Devnagiri) script, but had a hard time remembering which letter represented which sound. So he used the same techniques, and they worked very well indeed. Then, he tried it on his friends, and they learnt as well. Then, we started incorporating these reading techniques into a multi-media computer software programme and showing it to adult non-literates in and around Delhi. The early results were very encouraging. After a lot of experimenting and re-versioning and consultations with expert educators and psychologists round the world, we built a product and a manual plus a protocol and a training course. Then, we took the opportunity to do a pilot study on a community outside of Delhi with a large non-literate population. We trained three local volunteers as instructors, and enrolled 48 completely non-literate adult female students. We tested the first batch of 24 after 18 days and found that 75 percent of them could read! No, they weren’t about to sit down and go through the Mahabharata, they were still on the cat-sat-on-the-mat stage, but they could manage simple reading without any assistance.1 So, the students were then put onto a Reading club, which runs in the Community Hall every day, where they come and practice reading out loud together to improve their reading speeds. It is important to note that the drop out rate was only 20 percent, an astonishingly low figure as anyone who has tried running similar schemes in Indian rural areas will tell you. The next batch of 24 students is still on course as of this writing, and is making similar progress. Full results for this pilot study will be collated and published in due course. What Next? The future course of TARA Akshar encompasses the following measures: n We are going to try it on kids. (We already did some experiments with kids, but we need to fine tune our methodology.) n We are going to try it without a computer, but with just a TV and a VCR and playing cards. This makes it cheaper to deliver. n We want to try it in Primary Schools. Surely, there’s a lot more to reading than remembering what sound is which letter? Well, not really! Read the following out loud: "boput puldo soran falis cron" Not too difficult, was it? That’s because you, the reader, have total certainty on your English alphabet. For our students, it’s much easier, because they know that almost every word they are going to read is a word that they are already familiar with. (Yes, the words above are complete nonsense; they are not a foreign language!) The Memory Technique In this course, the student is not going to try to memorize anything, rather he/she is going to apply the techniques and the memorizing will look after itself. Here is an example. Imagine you are an English-speaker trying to remember that the Hindi word for rice is chaval. The chances are you will forget the word rapidly. Now, do the following: n Take ten seconds or more and get a picture in your mind of yourself shovelling rice into your mouth. n Have an imaginary voice in your head make the pun “let’s chaval rice into your mouth”. You will now remember that rice = chaval for several days or weeks. That’s because you made an association between the sound ‘chaval’ and the unforgettable picture of rice being shovelled into your mouth. The astonishing thing is that you, the reader, are being subjected to these techniques all the time. They are working on you, and you probably don’t know it. Well, when was the last time you bought anything significant that you had not seen advertised on TV! Most TV advertisements use memory techniques to get you to remember their products. So, we have an astonishing situation where most of the manufactured goods sold in this country are marketed using an extremely successful technique, yet in education, where it could revolutionize the whole education system as we know it, the technique is almost completely ignored. There is one man who is an evangelist for memory techniques. He is Tony Buzan, an English psychologist and internationally best-selling author, famous for inventing the technique of Mind Mapping. He went into an under-performing school in England with a BBC film crew and issued a challenge. He asked for six underachievers (all aged around 13) and with just a few days training of them and their teachers, he would turn them into something extraordinary in six months. He used memory techniques, Mind Mapping and a few other devices. The kids were tested by independent psychologists before and after. The results were extraordinary. The six kids went from the bottom of the scale to the top. Their study and their self-esteem as well as communication abilities improved enormously. Other Computer-based Techniques A method was devised by Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), which is India’s largest software company. It includes animations shown on a computer screen. But, unlike TARA Akshar, it does not teach writing. TCS state that their programme has now been used on about 40,000 students. Their programme claims to get a student to literacy in 40-50 hours' computer time, which works out to about three months on their recommended schedule. Unfortunately, there are no published studies to determine what percentage of students achieve their target reading speed. It is available in a number of Indian languages. TARA Akshar currently is only available in Hindi. And, we plan to produce a version in English also to teach people to read English in India, and the rest of the world. q Back to Contents |