Busy bees in the summertime
Jeffrey Mc
Neely, Chief Conservation Officer at the World Conservation Union (IUCN) in
Gland, Switzerland, dwelt on the busy bodies at the UNCED PrepCom in the
Network ‘92 No.7, June 1991.
The UNCED
PrepCom process resembles a beehive in a meadow in the middle of summer.
Everybody is busy, the corridors are a buzz with talk of sustainable
development, diplomats are launching themselves on important missions to other
hives, a thousand flowery new ideas are blooming, new international agreements
are being pollinated, and information is flowing hither and yon. By the end of
summer a beehive produces honey and wax. But the UNCED negotiations often seem
to resemble too many drones chasing one elusive queen.
In its influential 1987 report, the World Commission on Environment and
Development called for greatly improved international cooperation. This seems
to have led primarily to ever-growing numbers of international meetings and
lots of work for the international consulting community. The danger is that
international cooperation is often aimed at more and more sophisticated ways
of exploiting natural resources (called "rationalising sustainable use of
resources"), not in conserving them. The benefits of over-exploitation
flow especially to the international consumers, who gain the benefit of
steadily growing supplies of raw materials to feed their voracious appetites
for "essentials ". The honey is not staying in the local hive, but
is flowing to distant markets.
Meanwhile, the only future for the worker bees in the country side is more
work.
While increasing the amounts of foreign exchange available to the developing
countries is a commonly quoted objective of UNCED negotiations, the resulting
exploitation of resources for the benefit of the international market also has
costs. The international costs - climate change, pollution, species loss - are
well recognised by UNCED, and are the subject of seemingly endless
negotiations (often notable for lack of hard data on which to negotiate, and
fundamental disagreements abut how to interpret the data that exist). But even
greater costs are paid by the local people whose resources are being
over-exploited; while the international market can move on to other sources of
supply, the local communities must adapt to the resources available. They are
often put in the position where they must over-exploit their own environment
in order to meet their daily needs and the demands of a voracious external
market.
This is doubly ironic for the local communities - those who would earn the
direct benefits from using their local resources in a sustainable way-are also
sometimes the victims of conservation. When national parks, for example, do
not recognise the needs of the local communities, conflict is inevitable. What
can be done to enable to earn the benefit of sustainable use? Responses
include : more complete evaluations of the real cost of exploiting resources;
greater participation by local communities in decisions on both conservation
and resource exploitation; more complete sharing of information; more
effective drawing on local knowledge in management programmes; great
responsibility for local communities in managing the resources upon which
their welfare depends.
While the international negotiations continue, local communities remain the
units that are adapting to the real-life condition on the ground.
And who speaks for the local communities at UNCED? What response can be
expected to result form Rio? More bees in people’s bonnets, more sticky
fingers on the hands of exploiters, or at long last some real honey for the
rural people whose welfare depends directly upon sustainable forms of using
resources?
By the end of summer a beehive produced honey and wax. But the UNCED
negotiations often seem to resemble too many drones chasing one elusive queen.
It is apparent that the real sources of power in this world - governments and
the corporate sector - are advocating more exploitation of resources, often at
rates that ecologist consider unsustainable in the long term. While this is
often cloaked with tokens of environmental concern and words like
"sustainable development," the on-the-ground reality is something
far different. Local communities are losing power over their own lives, and
governments - both North and South - want them to produce more food, raw
materials, and products for the world marketplace, even when local ecosystems
are already suffering form over-exploitation. the outcome is often predictably
tragic.
Virtually the only voices being heard on behalf of true sustainability for
local communities come from various NGOs. Conservation NGOs argue that
protecting biodiversity is crucial to sustainable development; development
NGOs argue for empowerment of rural communities, especially on behalf of the
minorities. All of these are finding common ground in forms of development
which are aimed at maintaining healthy ecosystems that can be managed by local
communities for their own benefit.
The local expression of sustainable forms of development will vary greatly
from place to place, reflecting different cultures, climate, history, and
natural resources. This diversity of approaches to sustainability is to be
applauded. Local communities need appropriate encouragement and practical
support to build self-reliance, to adapt to changing conditions, to utilize
their local assets in ways that make sense to local needs.
Governments of North and South are squabbling over who gets what share of
honey, but the far more important question for the future welfare of humanity
is how to enable rural communities to develop sustainable forms of adapting to
changing conditions.
See you round the honey pot.
The ‘ 92 Global Forum
The ‘ 92 Global Forum
which will be jointly coordinated by the Brazilian NGO forum and the
International Facilitating Committee (IFC) is intended to be a series of
events, which provide an apportunity for all sectors to express their
independent views in Rio de Janeiro at the time of the Earth Summit.
Also included within the framework of the ‘ 92 Global Forum will be
individual events planned by women, youth , indigenous people and others as
well as an " Intersectoral Summit’ planned by the IFC. These meetings
and exhibitions will provide an opportunity for various sectors of society to
share with each other their recommendations to governments and their own plans
of action for the 21st century.
The site for the ‘ 92 Global Forum will be the area surrounding the Gloria
Hotel in rio, which encompasses the historical centre of Rio (where conference
facilities and hotel accommodation are being arranged) and the Flamengo Park
(which will be the venue for exhibitions, informal meetings and other suitable
outdoor activities including live transmission by television of UNCED itself.)
The headquartes for the Gloria Forum, including registration, travel and
accommodation facilities and communication centre will be located at the
Gloria Hotel in Rio, Which encompasses the historical centre of rio (where
conference facilities and hotel accommodation are being arranged) and the
Flamengo park (which will be the venue for exhibitions, informal meetings and
other suitable outdoor activities including live transmission by television of
UNCED itself.) the headquarters for the Gloria Forum, including registration,
travel and accommodation facilities and communication centre will be located
at the Gloria Conference Centre adjacent to the Gloria Hotel.
For planning the individual events of the independent sector organisations,
during the Earth Summit, the Global Forum coordinators have opened an office
in Rio at the following address :
International
Facilitating Committee
Hotel Gloria, prei
Anexo, Sala 366
Rua do Russel, 632
22212, rio de janeiro
Brazil
Tel : 5563030
Fax : 2054114
telex: 2141201 GLFO
Desks and operational support are available in the Global Forum for all
independent sector organisations planning events in Rio next June.
Organisations interested in securing a desk in the Global Forum’s office
should contact the office directly.
All equipment and facilities for the Global Forum’s office including
telephones, faxes, telexes, computers, moderns, photocopiers and furnitures
have been secured as contributions to a corporate sponsorship programme
organised between the Global Forum coordinators and the commercial association
of Rio de Janeiro represented by Mr. Paulo Protasio.
All indoor conference facilities within a 15-minute radius of the Gloria Hotel
and the Conference Centre have been blocked by the brazilian Government for
use by groups and organisations planning events as part of the Global Forum.
Exhibition booths are also available in Flamengo Park where materials and
goods can be shown and/or sold. Requests for meeting space (either indoor or
outdoor) and exhibition booths in Flamengo Park should be directed to the
Global Forum’s office in Rio.
To facilitate participation in the Global Forum, the Global Forum coordinators
will assist with accommodation and travel arrangement. Those interested in
securing accommodation in Rio next June, whether individually or as a group,
should contact the Global Forum’s office at the earliest possible date.
For details, please contact the Global Forum Office in Rio.
Meeting with the Minister
Events planned for the
‘ 92 Global Forum
Some of the events
planned for the ‘92 Global Forum are :
1992 Global Youth Summit
Symposium on Spiritual, Ethical and Policy issues in Environment and
Development
Workshop on Environmental Law
Workshop on Consumer Issues
Workshop on Biotechnology
Workshop on Environmental Education
Workshop on Women and Environment
Workshop on ‘Building of the New World’
Seminar on Renewable Energy Strategies
|
On 1st August 1991,
Shri Kamal Nath, the new Minister of Environment, invited a number of
independent sector organizations to share their respective views on
environmental questions facing the nation. The participants at the meeting
included Dr. Karan Singh (PCED), Dr. M. S. Swaminathan (WWF & MSSF), Dr.
T. N. Khoshoo (NAS), Ashok Khosla (Development Alternatives), R. K. pachauri
(TERI), Kartikeya Sarabhai (CEE), Anil Agarwal (CSE), Kirit Parikh (IGIDR),
Shekhar Singh (IIPA), Vandana Dhiva (Third World Network) and others. The
Minister was accompanied by senior officials of the Ministry of Environment
and Forests including Shri R. Rajamani, Secretary, Shri Samar Singh,
Additional Secretary and Shri Mukul Sanwal; Joint Secretary. Officials were
present also from the Ministry of External Affairs and the Planning
Commission.
Voluntary organization representatives set forth their views on various
environmental problems. The Minister was receptive to suggestions on improved
interactions between independent sector organizations and his Ministry and
invited participants to evolve ways aimed further improving cooperation among
them.
The Minister was particularly interested in ensuring the most effective
possible representation of independent sector organizations from India at the
UNCED Conference at Rio in June 1992. He felt that no only would this be
important for supplementing the role of the official Indian delegation in a
positive manner and in exposing a large number of Indian NGOs to global issues
which might become important for the future, but also for establishing
influential channels of communication with northern NGOs who, in turn, can
influence their own respective national policies. he encouraged PCED,
Development Alternatives and others to work out various ways in which the
national input to UNCED could be of the highest quality. He promised further
dialogue with the independent sector in the near future.
|
UNCED Update
Get accredited now! time is running out
The last PrepCom in
Geneva which ended on the 4th September decided that only those
representatives of the Independent sectors which are accredited to the prepCom
by the end of its fourth and final session in New york will be invited to
attend the conference in Rio de Janeiro. The final PrepCom ends on April 3,
1992, so if you are not already accredited to UNCED, you should do so as soon
as possible. (It is important to note that you do not have to attend the
PrepCom meetings in order to get accreditation.)
PrepCom grants accreditation to those organisations of the independent sectors
that are able to prove their "competence and relevance" regarding
the issues being discussed by UNCED. To help it make a decision about any
given organisation, the PrepCom has asked the UNCED secretariat to make
recommendations for accreditation. In order for the secretariat to make its
judgement on which organisations to accredit, the secretariat requires the
following information from interested groups and organisations :
- |
a copy of the latest annual
report or a copy of the statutes of establishment and other relevant
information demonstrating that the organisation is a legally registered
non-profit organisation;
|
- |
information on governing
body composition (if not already included in the annual report), a
description of membership and location of headquarters;
|
- |
a short description of how
the organisation’s activities relate to UNCED
Include the
above information with a sheet detailing your address, telephone no. etc.
The sooner you apply the better the chances of being accredited at the next
PrepCom!
|
Contact :UNCED,
B.P. 80, CH-1213 Conches, Switzerland, Tel. (41-220 789 1676, Fax . 789 35
36.
Back
to Contents
|