Recurring natural
disasters tend to capture the public attention, but sometimes little
is learned from successful reconstruction experiences. Thus, we wish
to highlight a post-earthquake reconstruction project in Guatemala
after the devastating earthquake of February 4, 1976, a project that
has withstood the test of time and several strong earth tremors.
After
the earthquake, that caused the death of some 24,000 persons and
destroyed more than 250,000 houses, clay construction was considered
unsafe and the national government was considering a ban on
"adobe" – the traditional clay construction technology
widely used in Guatemala.
This
project concentrated on the Department of Baja Verapaz, a hard hit
area in the centre of the country, somewhat off the beaten track,
where no other agency was supporting reconstruction projects.
Based
on the social work of the church (as liberation theology had created
popular organisations), we started a practical education program to
demonstrate that possibilities do exist to improve the security of
adobe houses while keeping costs within the reach of the poor
majorities. A team of adobe-builders was trained and we built a
total of 150 houses (through guided self-help) in dozens of outlying
villages as well as in the neighbourhoods of the small towns. In a
nutshell, it was reconstruction in a sustainable manner,
concentrating on setting examples of earthquake resistant houses
that are affordable to the general public. The project was mobilised
and totally financed by Caritas Switzerland. The major beneficiaries
were the 150 poor families who had lost their homes in the
earthquake. However, 18 masons who learnt a new trade also
benefited, with several of them later working as village masons,
benefiting more poor families with affordable and safe construction.
The
project was based entirely upon popular participation. The
"new" ideas about building with adobe, but improving the
technique and workmanship did not find much enthusiasm at the
beginning and, therefore, a careful and slow build-up of confidence
was needed. Through this process, a deep commitment to the project
developed with many of the beneficiaries and all organisational
decisions were taken in the management group that composed of
beneficiaries and masons with the project manager being the only
outside person included in the team.
The
project as such was finished in 1979. However, a follow-up
evaluation in 2001 has revealed positive results, for which we have
obtained co-financing through Caritas Switzerland and Basin network
partners to publish the results. We are currently seeking funding to
further divulge the results, especially in El Salvador after the
earthquakes of recent months, for which activities two small Swiss
organisations have expressed interest.
The
preliminary report of the interdisciplinary team from the Guatemalan
National University is very encouraging. No technical problems have
been detected and the social organisation has yielded other results
in several villages (drinking water, community buildings, etc.).
This
evaluation is very important, as in neighbouring El Salvador a
series of earthquakes has caused much destruction and the heated
discussions on the safety of clay buildings is again under way. We
plan to propagate the results of this investigation in Salvador and
organise reciprocal visits of some of the Baja Verapaz community
leaders and decision makers in Salvador.
Most
publications about "earthquake resistant buildings"
propagate "improvements" that are either not proven, or
are costly, or both. The fact remains that for many poor people in
the Third World, clay is their only chance of building a decent
house. This project has been based upon the findings of a UN-funded
analysis 1
of the devastating Peruvian earthquake of 1970 and has made
empirical checks on those findings prior to starting the
construction process. The thesis is that it is deficient workmanship
and disregard of basic construction principles that have caused the
majority of failures in adobe buildings. Therefore,
the project concentrated on improving those deficiencies through
practical and theoretical education as well as the construction of
houses that are replicable (affordable) by the majority of locals
without outside financing. Until 1980, three more housing projects
were built using the same technology and since then an unspecified
number of houses have been constructed by the people themselves or
by hiring a village mason using some or most of the improvements
taught. The
printed manual produced within this project 2
has become a standard of adobe-literature and its drawings have been
copied into dozens of publications, lamentably in most cases without
giving credit. At this moment, in the current adobe discussion in
Salvador, it is being used prominently. In several countries,
housing projects have been built (by NGOs) based directly on this
manual (Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Cuba, Ecuador, Dominican
Republic).3
q
The
author is the President of Grupos Sofonias, an International NGO
1 |
Proyecto experimental
de Viviendas (Ministerio de Vivienda – Naciones Unidas,
1971) |
2 |
"Manual para la
construcción de viviendas con adobe", Caritas de
Guatemala |
3 |
Only
projects listed which the author knows of personally |
|