Value Chains and Enterprise Promotion
Opportunities – A perspective

 

Over the last few years value chain mapping has emerged as one of the preferred diagnostic tools for identifying intervention opportunities.

From the point of view of enterprise promotion strategy, value chain analysis offers a better alternative. Simply put, this analysis for any business or firm is the link set of value creating activities all the way from basic raw material sources for component suppliers to the ultimate end-use product delivered into the consumer’s hands (Porter, 1985).

Contrary to popular belief, value chains are dynamic and flexible, and are constantly being redefined. The actors in the value chain often display opportunistic behaviour. This is characterised by their desire to constantly reinvent and channelise capital into ventures that offer best economic returns.

From the livelihood promotion perspective, the opportunistic behaviour of value chains offers an opportunity because it tends to dismantle entry and exit barriers which often act as major bottlenecks.

Broadly speaking, there are three critical factors driving the behaviour of value chains that need to be studied in depth in order to arrive at a decision with respect to enterprise promotion.

How do the poor manage costs and derive competitive edge?

Some of the common strategies to better manage their costs are:
use of household labour
cost sharing by involving the customer in the production process
use of common resources – like street lights and pavements in the urban context
focus on a limited number of commodities helps to achieve scale

Technology

Technology has always been the key driver which redefined value chains. The use of technology covers a large spectrum right from designing and applying a better tool to having a complex inventory management system as in the case of a large format store. When it comes to livelihood promotion we are often governed by our ideologies, capabilities and preferences and this tends to produce sub-optimal results for the community.

The key to identifying appropriate technology is to take a customer‘s perspective. The question which we need to reflect upon is whether a given step will result in a better and uniform production, faster product delivery and lowering of product management costs and therefore, whether it will benefit the end consumer. If so then this should be our choice. Any enterprise which adopts this strategy will be able to beat its competitors and create a niche for itself.

Cost

The competitive advantage which a producer may enjoy is a function of its ability to manage costs. A producer with lower costs will always have an advantage.

In the context of livelihoods, one is taking a broader view of the term ‘costs’. For a livelihood enterprise costs include personal as well as social costs which the owner expects to recover from the enterprise.

For example, during one of the studies of retail enterprises in the rural areas of Jharkhand, I met several enterprise owners who said that a large portion of their "sales" actually consisted of household consumption by their large households. What it told me was that we often refuse to acknowledge social costs as an element of the cost of production. If this is taken into consideration then the enterprise must generate very high returns to be able to support this sort of cost structure.

This is not feasible as the type of goods sold and quantities traded offer little scope for going beyond subsistence returns. This is true as much for farming as it is for livestock or trading.

Product Differentiation

The third dimension in managing value chain is to create product differentiation. This is often referred to as unique selling proposition as it allows a producer to redefine the cost structure within a given value chain.

One of the best examples of how product differentiation contributes to creating a Unique Selling Product is the case of handloom saree. The base raw material is invariably cotton or silk and yet one finds significant variations in terms of designs, weaving pattern and colour, allowing the weaver to seek a premium.

For enterprises that operate in commodity business space, the opportunity to differentiate products is limited and that restricts the ability of the producer to charge a premium. This affects their earning potential. In such a situation, the majority of the producers are likely to earn normal or below normal returns.

Implications

The above discussion highlights the key issues that need to be addressed by the implementing agency. Once the value chain mapping is done, one can identify the best option available in order to derive a competitive edge. q

Sachin Mardikar
Sachin.Mardikar@reliancefoundation.org
ngpsachin@gmail.com

 

Back to Contents

 

Share

Subscribe Home

Contact Us

About Us