t
was a hot and humid August afternoon when I was returning back from
Niwari to TARAgram, Orchha. On the way, I tuned into a local FM
station which was then playing an old Hindi melody.
Madhuban khushboo deta hai,
saagar saawan deta hai
Jeena uska jeena hai, jo auro ko jeewan deta hai
Indeevar, who had penned this
famous song, hailed from Baruasagar in Jhansi district of Bundelkhand.
Was Bundelkhand famous as the land of warriors, the great Rani Laxmi Bai,
national poet Maithili Sharan Gupt or Bundelkhand, or was it known for
its abject conditions of poverty, social unrest, high rates of migration
and recently being in the news for suicide bids by farmers?
At times I wonder if
Bundelkhand is just land of problems or is it a land of opportunities.
What are generally highlighted are its weaknesses, scarcities and
cravings. Such thoughts were hovering in my mind while I listened to the
song. This piece is my effort to put forth on paper my personal five
years of understanding of Bundelkhand apropos to my 25-year-young
institution, Development Alternatives and the even younger TARAgram.
It has been over three years
since I met one of the most powerful women in Bundelkhand. Gomti Devi is
a rarity amongst the common women. She is one of the most prominent
workers among the cluster of women’s Self Help Group who led the
struggle to set up a livestock-based livelihood centre known as Ram Raja
Gaushala near Orchha in Tikamgarh district of Madhya Pradesh. The centre
is one of its kind, being owned, managed and operated by a cluster of
women SHGs and supported by the State Government.
One day at the Gaushala, I
asked Gomti Devi, ‘What do you think is the biggest resource in
Bundelkhand?’
‘Its people’, she promptly
answered, ‘but they need to be constructively guided and directed.
People, after consistent effort, do get together for a common vision,
but then suffer because the vision gradually starts fading. One needs to
ensure that the members of the group are often reminded of the vision
and mission that had initially brought them together.
Gomti:
Do you understand, Babu?
Me: Yes I do. But why is it so
difficult to get people together?
Gomti:
Because, first they are guided by their perceptions, beliefs and
personal priorities. You need to work together with them to understand
their correct perceptions and challenge the wrong ones and gradually
build trust in the people. Then they will listen to you.
Me: How do you challenge the
wrong perceptions?
Gomti:
People need evidence before they change their perceptions and beliefs.
You need to create evidences, not just one but many, and expose people
to them so that they start believing what you feel and say. This is how
we build trust. This is what a leader should do. You know you also need
to accept their priorities and work with them in order to find
solutions.
Me: But don’t people get angry
when you challenge their perceptions?
Gomti:
Obviously. You should not lose patience. Anger is
a form of emotion, like love. If properly channeled, anger can prove to
be a wonderful stimulus to trigger revolutions that our Bundelkhand as
also our country demands in plenty.
Me: Lastly, people say
Bundelkhand is poor. You have lived for a long time here. What do you
think is the basic problem here?
Gomti:
To me, there is only one problem. The word Khand in Bundelkhand.
Sunne se lagat hai kachu toot gao (when you hear the word
khand, it feels as if something has broken off). The solution lies
in the word akhand.
It is not a question whether
Gomti was right or wrong. The issue is much deeper and calls for
introspection by each one of us. Complex problems may not always have
simple solutions, but simplicity in thinking may result in complex
solutions that are simple. Rigidity on what but flexibility on
how is what people and their institutions need to practice. Indeevar
further wrote q
Suraj na ban paaye to, banke deepak jalta chal
Phool mile ya angaare, sach ki raaho pe chalta chal
Jeena uska jeena hai jo auron ko jeewan deta hai,
Madhuban khushboo deta hai