lsewhere
in this newsletter I was asked why I joined – re-joined (post study
leave) and stayed - on at Development Alternatives. This has not been
the first time this question has been asked of me (and I am sure of many
of my colleagues have made DA their home and the development sector
their calling). The question is relevant in our times of high human
resource iteration when DA is still a place of no rest – daily
challenges at work, tough working conditions and low salaries. In these
days of tremendous competition from agencies that offer high salaries
and easier working conditions - Why stay here?
Amongst many of the reasons of
staying on, one that has been a constant is that of a ‘team’. I am a
team person, a person who gets her energy from the dynamics of a group
that is catalysed into thought and action by and through discussion and
working with rather than working for.
I realised my calling early on
- where I want to go, what I want to do. These goals cannot be carried
out alone. What is required is a team, a group of people who dream and
work together for the same goal and everyone puts in their different
bits to realise that dream.
And even though I was asked by
the editorial board of this newsletter to talk about the ‘disappearing
ducks’ I would like to write about some of those ‘team moments’, moments
which are etched in memory for the dynamic energy they generated just
because at that particular time the whole was in sync with the parts.
You could stand outside your body and watch the team at work and move as
in a wave towards a common purpose – when the energy in the space was
palpable and the electric current was touching all the bodies present in
that moment.
All these moments have been
moments of creation, a la eureka, of a solution and of tremendous
learning and, most of all, of feeling both powerful and humble at the
same time. And many of these moments have ended in a celebration of
togetherness with the team.
One of the earliest memories is
in 1990 during the construction of the IGNCA building in Delhi. It was
an ambitious project and my first on field. The main structure was
complete and the staircase was under construction – time pressure was
upon us (as always).
The formwork from the last arch
of the staircase was to be removed, the arch was yet to be built and lay
unsupported on one side. Gandhi mason was on the scaffold, hammering
gently at the formwork. Suddenly, to my horror, there was a loud noise.
I saw Gandhi leap from the second floor formwork to the terrace below -
the staircase had come down! We rushed to count heads, any injuries, any
casualties. Fortunately, there were none. One learnt the hard way that
all forces have to be resolved! And arches require adequate top loading
before de-shuttering. We also learnt the value of being together in
turbulent times.
Another memory surfaces. IGNCA
again. November 20, 1990, The IGNCA wanted to ensure that the central
core would support the load of the dome – the largest of its kind at
that time. The theoretical calculations all pointed to a satisfactory
result but there were cracks in walls that had to be tested in real
time. So, with barely a month to go before the opening, we decided to
load test the structure, to destroy the same if required, and bear the
consequences – just one of the many risks we have taken together. With
the open skies over our heads making work more challenging and a
torrential rain that soaked us to the bone, we loaded sand bags on the
central slab across the yet unfinished bridge. Working alongside the
labour force, carrying sand bags, calculating the loads on the slab and
the walls below, checking the growth of cracks if any – it was an
eventful night – a culmination of intense preparation for a process that
ended with sighs of relief when the loading more than surpassed the
design loads. Celebrations were due. Under the staircase, GC Aggarwal
lay drunk and exhausted, along with the AC DC carpenters. Dr Ashok
Khosla, who had been with us through it all, dropped off the women –
three of us at Pat’s place where he celebrated his first wedding
anniversary with us while his wife was waiting at her father’s house. He
will certainly not forget that day in a hurry. Pat has been a constant
presence in many of the team moments…
TA3.2 – Budgeting and project
development – Excel sheeting - Where is the baniyan? This
question always draws a smile from Subroto, my guru in Excel. And what a
way to learn! This was the first ‘large project’ that we were developing
in 1995 with SDC. The Building Materials Project, which has laid the
foundation for our work in energy efficient building materials,
innovation and enterprise models, was popularly known as TA3.2 – its
file number at SDC. It has given us much learning and, most important of
all, a bonding and learning to work together. Conceptualising the
project was one thing with all our wish lists put in, but designing it
practically for operations was quite another. Five days and nights of
working on detailing the budget, working through without going back home
– I learnt how to use the software and connect the worksheets and files
and connect with my colleagues – is a bond that has stayed since. The
sweaty odour of Subroto’s baniyan (vest) finally drove us home to
bathe and change!! The logic of budget preparation for a project has
stayed on, a tool I still use and which has stood the test of time.
ESTF – Understanding material
movement – TA3.2 again! Our work on energy in building materials and our
understanding of embodied energy in construction grew by leaps and
bounds in the process. The surveys with Geeta and Sriraman to understand
material flows in Bundelkhand – the mapping and analysis of resources
and skills and discussions on the intensity of resource extraction,
decentralised production, local economy components, resource intensities
and financial paybacks and, of course, the nexus between truck drivers
and aggregate units and brick producers between Kanpur and Jhansi. The
learning from the ESTF, as it was then popularly called (ecological,
social, technological and financial), sustainability indicators
development, has been the base for many of the building technology
projects since. It has become a filtering method for selection and
development of enterprises. It also laid the base for us to absorb and
take on the sustainable building practices methodology that SKAT
introduced later.
Incidentally, SKAT and SDC have
often been part of the DA ‘teams’. The learning and bonding with the two
agencies were so intense that we were like seamless single project
entities. These friendships have stood the test of time and today, even
if we are not sharing the same projects, we share the same jokes, the
same concerns and call upon each other when we need sounding boards.
basin-South
Asia formation - The basin-South Asia 2004 conference
was our first mega event planned with 200 people (now appears small in
comparison to the much larger events since).This was a beginning. A
young team that had decided to take the shelter programme to a next
level – from technology to habitat and livelihoods. We had decided to
scale up and were convinced that partnerships and knowledge exchange
through dialogues with multi-stakeholders on neutral platforms would
provide answers to ‘scaling up and scaling out’ of good practices. What
followed was one year of planning, fund-raising, detailing and logistic
management by this team which was sometimes whipped and sometimes
cajoled but often just too excited to be on the same journey together to
pull of a show that is remembered today for the flawless arrangements,
quality of discussions, nature of the partnerships it catalysed, the
relevance of the cultural evening – that of artisans migrating into a
large city for work / livelihoods and losing their shelter - Ghar ki
Chhat ki talash mein perho ki chhanv se bhi gaye. And of the various
conference materials that were developed and the quality of proceedings
and media coverage we received. The partnerships formed and changes
brought about resulted in the basin-South Asia platform
that has brought information and knowledge about good practices in
habitat to many practitioners and has played a major role in influencing
policy formulation process for the Indian national rural habitat policy.
The conference was also a turning point for the shelter programme that
metamorphosed into the DA Rural Habitat programme and, in the coming
years, was built up by this team into a visible force within and outside
the organisation.
From 2004 to 2007, the habitat
team remained an exceptional partnership in solidarity. Often there were
moments when I would walk into the demonstration room at the Ghitorni
campus that was our office then and just soak in the energies from the
intensity of discussions and hum of activity. There were many parallel
projects and the different sub-teams would appraise each other during
the breaks. The rural housing in Bundelkhand where the teams in Orchha
would be, the DWL initiative in drinking water in Jodhpur, the basin-South
Asia multiple programmes, the reconstruction projects in Puthukuppam
and Karaikal – yes, we were together through the thick and thin of it
all. Dolly, Mona, Pankaj, Ramesh, Anand, Usha, Sadhna, Priyanka,
Abhishikta, Vinit, Ranjeet, Aparna... the list goes on.
The basin-South Asia
team across India and South Asia and its many team moments also come
within the cherished memories. The solidarity that the platform has
brought about and the new friendships it has helped consolidate are
gifts as important as the knowledge sharing and learning it has
fostered.
The rural housing policy
debates were a two-year-long process that brought together a larger team
with and outside of DA. The habitat team, the basin-South Asia
partners and the PACS Programme teams worked in sync with great
complementarities. The process has, amongst many other things, given us
the confidence to take on large initiatives and build trust across all
our organisations. I remember the preparations before each of the many
consultative workshops, the rush of the adrenalin that seemed to flow
each time over a hundred grassroots agencies, government and banks would
come together and debate on policy clauses. We have developed quite an
expertise in workshop management and consultations in the process.
Sharad, Poonam, Sanjeev, Rakesh and Kiran – the habitat team - had
reached out and held hands across the organisation. And, how can I
forget the many friendships that we have made in process!
Karaikal – this project had its
own team moments. I would credit General Merchant and Pat for fostering
a core team and a team spirit that has pushed us to do our best in this
challenging project.
There have been many similar
‘team moments’ during the training programmes in Jehanabad and Kashmir,
the Azadpura project, the Gujarat reconstruction and the Orissa BMSB
formation, the Sustainable Building Practices workshops in Pune and
Gujarat and the trainings where we learned to work together (the grid
training and the networking for multiplication discussions in
particular).
The Habitat team has broken up
– a natural and inevitable result of the re-structuring process that has
marked our transition to the next wave – the next 25 years, the team
spirit lives on and new teams are being formed with every project, every
new initiative taking every new germ of an idea to its logical
conclusion.
On a more theoretical mode, if
I analyse this ‘team moment’, it is not one moment in time but a sharing
process that could be a day, or an event over many days. This was a
coming together of a people who are able to trust each other with their
dreams and aspirations, where each one feels responsible and accountable
to the other, respects the inputs that each brings in and puts in
his/her best for that common aim. And when that common aim becomes
larger than the individual aims, we get that terrific energy that comes
from a process of learning and creating something together.
The challenge before us today,
as we catch the surf and climb onto the next wave, is to continue to
recognise and value these team moments, to build upon them, for these
are the stuff that relationships are made of, the glue that holds us
together, the building blocks that take us to new heights and the
strength that give the confidence to take on the many challenges that
have brought us together in the first place.
Incidentally, those are not
ducks – they are geese; and although some would vehemently disagree, I
suspect, they appear on dinner tables sometimes of men and animals, even
though they are very carefully accounted for in Phool Singh’s stock
register!