l 
        it can cope with and recover from stresses and 
        shocks;
        l 
        it can maintain or enhance its capabilities and 
        assets;
        l 
        l it is able to provide net benefits to other 
        livelihoods locally as also widely, both now and in the future; and 
        l 
        it does not undermine the natural resource base.
        Development practitioners use 
        various assessment techniques and tools to design and plan livelihood 
        interventions for a community or an area. The choice and selection of 
        tools for information collection depends on several factors. Procurement 
        of relevant information/ data and project time frame are usually taken 
        into consideration. Often, it is the tool and methodology that plays an 
        important role in determining the project’s effectiveness and success.
        Community participation is an important factor in any information 
        collection exercise. Thus, it is a primary means of information 
        collection. In cases where livelihood intervention is the focus, it is 
        important to have a primary and secondary source of information.
        It is against this background 
        that Development Alternatives came up with an innovative and easily 
        applicable method called Participatory Livelihood Assessment Technique 
        (PLAT). PLAT is a useful tool either for baseline data collection or for 
        needs assessment. PLAT has a strong combination of participatory methods 
        of information collection backed by related secondary information. This 
        enables cross checking of information from both sources to enable 
        viability and sustainability of the livelihood activities and 
        enterprises identified.
        Geographical Coverage
        PLAT has been used in three 
        states of India (Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Bihar), covering 21 
        districts and 210villages by DA. The common issue addressed was the 
        vulnerability of the community to human trafficking. Apart from this, 
        all the three states were marked by differences in geography, 
        socio-economic conditions, natural resources, etc.
        PLAT’s Uniqueness
        The uniqueness of PLAT lies in 
        its distinction from the two main tools commonly used for undertaking 
        need assessment – PRA and Research. While PRA relies mainly on primary 
        sources, it is a secondary resource, which is the major focus of 
        research.
        The significance of primary sources lies in its ability to procure 
        information from the affected community, while secondary sources 
        strengthen the findings of primary sources with other studies, as also 
        various researches conducted in the past. It is useful to have a 
        combination of both sources while undertaking a needs assessment 
        exercise.
        This combination is also important in a situation where a development 
        agency intends to multiply the impact of its intervention for the 
        community by either:
        l 
        making a connection with the external scenario (in 
        terms of market, policy and other influencing factors); or 
        l 
        establishing linkages with the existing government 
        schemes and interventions of other agencies.
        Process: How DA Applies PLAT
        PLAT has been a very useful 
        tool because:
        l  
        it is a standardized methodology
         l  
        it has standardized formats and guidelines 
        PLAT was launched on the field 
        as a result of a planned and well-designed process. A Training of 
        Trainers (ToT) was organized for each of the partner Civil Society 
        Organizations (CSOs) on the use of PLAT. The exercise was carried out by 
        taking one project village of each CSO. This enabled the partner CSO to 
        undertake the exercise on its own in the rest of the 9 villages. (Most 
        of the CSOs had one district and each district had 10 villages, except 
        for 2 CSOs; one had 3 and another had 2 districts). In total, the PLAT 
        exercise was undertaken in 210 villages in 21 districts of the three 
        states.
        Armed with the tools and 
        techniques, PLAT was conducted by 17 partner CSOs. The uniform and 
        standardized methodology and well-designed formats, coupled with the 
        adoption of flexibility and openness brought in by the participatory 
        principles, greatly contributed in the following achievements:
        
        l  
        the partner NGO’s ability to learn the methodology within the planned 
        time frame 
        l  
        the exercise being successfully conducted in a simultaneous and uniform 
        manner across the 210 sites
        l 
        hassle-free collation and analysis of the 
        collected data due to the well- designed and standardized formats 
        Thus, the use of PLAT threw up 
        a vast amount of information and data, which was collated and then 
        analyzed. The analysis led to the identification of livelihood skills on 
        which the community received extensive following training.
        Conclusion
        Thus, PLAT emerged from a need 
        for collecting and using reliable baseline data in a short span of time. 
        PLAT is a useful tool in situations where the project timeframe is 
        limited/short and where the baseline information needs to be collected 
        fast and implementation needs to be done on the basis of reliable 
        information/data. However, this does not mean that projects with a 
        longer time frame are excluded from using this tool.
        PLAT was successful in 
        involving the community in planning and assess-ment exercises. This made 
        the imple-mentation easier and interventions more sustainable, primarily 
        because of the community’s ownership of the interventions and also due 
        to the added strength from the secondary sources of information.