l
it can cope with and recover from stresses and
shocks;
l
it can maintain or enhance its capabilities and
assets;
l
l it is able to provide net benefits to other
livelihoods locally as also widely, both now and in the future; and
l
it does not undermine the natural resource base.
Development practitioners use
various assessment techniques and tools to design and plan livelihood
interventions for a community or an area. The choice and selection of
tools for information collection depends on several factors. Procurement
of relevant information/ data and project time frame are usually taken
into consideration. Often, it is the tool and methodology that plays an
important role in determining the project’s effectiveness and success.
Community participation is an important factor in any information
collection exercise. Thus, it is a primary means of information
collection. In cases where livelihood intervention is the focus, it is
important to have a primary and secondary source of information.
It is against this background
that Development Alternatives came up with an innovative and easily
applicable method called Participatory Livelihood Assessment Technique
(PLAT). PLAT is a useful tool either for baseline data collection or for
needs assessment. PLAT has a strong combination of participatory methods
of information collection backed by related secondary information. This
enables cross checking of information from both sources to enable
viability and sustainability of the livelihood activities and
enterprises identified.
Geographical Coverage
PLAT has been used in three
states of India (Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Bihar), covering 21
districts and 210villages by DA. The common issue addressed was the
vulnerability of the community to human trafficking. Apart from this,
all the three states were marked by differences in geography,
socio-economic conditions, natural resources, etc.
PLAT’s Uniqueness
The uniqueness of PLAT lies in
its distinction from the two main tools commonly used for undertaking
need assessment – PRA and Research. While PRA relies mainly on primary
sources, it is a secondary resource, which is the major focus of
research.
The significance of primary sources lies in its ability to procure
information from the affected community, while secondary sources
strengthen the findings of primary sources with other studies, as also
various researches conducted in the past. It is useful to have a
combination of both sources while undertaking a needs assessment
exercise.
This combination is also important in a situation where a development
agency intends to multiply the impact of its intervention for the
community by either:
l
making a connection with the external scenario (in
terms of market, policy and other influencing factors); or
l
establishing linkages with the existing government
schemes and interventions of other agencies.
Process: How DA Applies PLAT
PLAT has been a very useful
tool because:
l
it is a standardized methodology
l
it has standardized formats and guidelines
PLAT was launched on the field
as a result of a planned and well-designed process. A Training of
Trainers (ToT) was organized for each of the partner Civil Society
Organizations (CSOs) on the use of PLAT. The exercise was carried out by
taking one project village of each CSO. This enabled the partner CSO to
undertake the exercise on its own in the rest of the 9 villages. (Most
of the CSOs had one district and each district had 10 villages, except
for 2 CSOs; one had 3 and another had 2 districts). In total, the PLAT
exercise was undertaken in 210 villages in 21 districts of the three
states.
Armed with the tools and
techniques, PLAT was conducted by 17 partner CSOs. The uniform and
standardized methodology and well-designed formats, coupled with the
adoption of flexibility and openness brought in by the participatory
principles, greatly contributed in the following achievements:
l
the partner NGO’s ability to learn the methodology within the planned
time frame
l
the exercise being successfully conducted in a simultaneous and uniform
manner across the 210 sites
l
hassle-free collation and analysis of the
collected data due to the well- designed and standardized formats
Thus, the use of PLAT threw up
a vast amount of information and data, which was collated and then
analyzed. The analysis led to the identification of livelihood skills on
which the community received extensive following training.
Conclusion
Thus, PLAT emerged from a need
for collecting and using reliable baseline data in a short span of time.
PLAT is a useful tool in situations where the project timeframe is
limited/short and where the baseline information needs to be collected
fast and implementation needs to be done on the basis of reliable
information/data. However, this does not mean that projects with a
longer time frame are excluded from using this tool.
PLAT was successful in
involving the community in planning and assess-ment exercises. This made
the imple-mentation easier and interventions more sustainable, primarily
because of the community’s ownership of the interventions and also due
to the added strength from the secondary sources of information.