The Crisis of Elementary Education in
India
Title : The Crisis of Elementary Education in
India
Edited by :
Ravi Kumar
Published by :
Sage Publications
Pages :
357
Price :
Rs. 695/- ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

rticle
45 of the Directive Principles of State Policy deals with the education
of children till age 14, though it has been amended since, it
originally read:The
state shall endeavour to provide, within a period of ten years from the
commencement of the Constitution, for free and compulsory education for
all children until they complete the age of fourteen years.
The grace
period ended on the Republic Day of 1960! It is not that the government
has been inactive either on the national or international front,
concedes Vasudha Dhagamwar (MARG, human rights activist), one of the
contributors to this compilation. Apart from its own action plans, the
government has become signatory to a number of international
initiatives that mentioned education as a child’s right.
And
yet today, the only way to sum up primary education in India – it is
still in a state of CRISIS!
This acute crisis is overtly manifested with a vast mass of illiterates
on one hand, while on the other there is a subterranean process underway
that delegitimises the role of the state as a service provider. The
crisis further entrenches itself in tacit acknowledgement with the
State wherein formal schooling will not be available to every child and
hence, one encounters the preponderance of non-formal methods of
education of a mass scale – Ravi Kumar,
Associate Fellow, Council for Social Development, New Delhi, states in
his introduction.
In 2005 the
President of India regretted the fact that only 4 per cent of the GDP
was spent on education. It is not that the framers of the Constitution
overlooked the school going child but they enshrined the right in Part
IV in the Directive Principles of State Policy and not in Part III which
would have made education a fundamental right. As part of Directive
Principles of State Policy the right was non-justiceable.
On 28 November 2001, observes eminent educationist, Anil Sadgopal, even
as the Lok Sabha was debating the 93rd Amendment,
purportedly to make education a fundamental right, 40,000 people from
different parts of the country held a rally at the Ramlila grounds to
protest against the Bill. Their contention? The Bill violated the
principle of equality enshrined in the Constitution…………..Sub ko
shiksha,samaan shiksha - was their demand. The Bill, which of course
was pushed through by both Houses of Parliament, created apprehensions
that it would allow the state to withdraw from its constitutional
obligation under Article 45 of ensuring free and compulsory education to
children till they complete 14 years of age and bring it under the
obligation of parents and the community as their fundamental
duty.
Sadgopal
quotes a newspaper report on International Literacy Day, 2004
Facing a
shortage of students, the Directorate of Education has decided to close
down 53 government schools, many of which are in old Delhi. This is in
addition to the 55 schools already closed…….we have a steady decline in
government schools….
How do
you motivate marginalized parents and their children? The rural, the
girl child, the girl at puberty, Dalits, children with special needs?
How do you motivate teachers? If there are schools with very few
children on the verge of closure there are also populous schools with
ridiculous teacher/student ratio.
Several of
these issues have been addressed in the volume as it examines policy,
legal obligations, economic implications, gender and inclusive
education.
Education is said to be the single most important agenda in the context
of development today, tomes have been written on education policies,
several policies have been framed, thousands of hours have been expended
on seminars, debates and other forums round the world – India has been a
most enthusiastic signatory to various declarations on child’s right to
education – yet we have one of the largest populations of non-school
going children in the developing world. About time we identified
practical solutions and got down to teaching our teeming under
fourteens, there is no time for indulging in rhetoric – enough time has
been lost, we have raised too many uneducated adults. q
Back to Contents
|