The
critical role groundwater plays as a decentralised source of drinking
water for millions of rural and urban families cannot be overstated.
According to estimates, it accounts for nearly 80 per cent of the rural
domestic water needs and 50 per cent of the urban water needs in India.
Groundwater
is generally less susceptible to contamination and pollution when
compared to surface water bodies. Also, the natural impurities in
rainwater, which replenishes groundwater systems, get removed while
infiltrating through the soil strata.
In India, where
groundwater is used intensively for irrigation and industrial purposes,
a variety of land and water based human activities are causing pollution
of this precious resource. Its over-exploitation is causing aquifer
contamination in certain instances, while in certain others its
unscientific development, with insufficient knowledge of groundwater
flow dynamics and geo-hydrochemical processes has led to its
mineralization and organic contamination.
The
incidences of Fluoride and Arsenic above their permissible levels in the
groundwater occur in various Indian states, namely - Andhra Pradesh,
Rajasthan, Bihar, Gujarat, Haryana, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh,
Maharashtra,
Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal,
affecting a total of more than 100 districts.
Apart from these toxic
pollutants, the groundwater is also facing a threat from unsewered
domestic waste that can cause severe groundwater contamination by
pathogenic bacteria, nitrate and other pollutants. Non-point pollution
caused by fertilisers and pesticides used in agriculture, often
dispersed over large areas, is a great threat to fresh groundwater
ecosystems. Intensive use of chemical fertilizers in farms and
indiscriminate disposal of human and animal waste on land, result in
leaching of the residual nitrate causing high nitrate concentrations in
groundwater.
Three fourth of
the world population lives in developing countries like India, where
there is an alarming trend of groundwater pollution due to nitrates. A
study conducted in Bulgaria has shown that when groundwater is being
tapped in pockets, nitrates from the surrounding soil profile can
migrate and accumulate in such pockets and this phenomenon has been
observed in soils which are otherwise low in nitrate concentration. Such
studies serve as a warning to countries like India of the impending
nitrate pollution, where groundwater exploitation is growing at a
tremendous rate.
The nitrate
concentration In India is above the permissible level of 45 ppm in 11
states, covering 95 districts and two blocks of Delhi. It is known that
excess levels can cause methemoglobinemia, or “blue baby” disease
in infants. Although nitrate levels that affect infants do not pose a
direct threat to older children and adults, they do indicate the
possible presence of other more serious residential or agricultural
contaminants, such as bacteria or pesticides.
Possible causes
of nitrate contamination of drinking water include cultivation of crops
for which high doses of nitrogen fertilisers are applied: e.g. tobacco,
vegetables, flowers, etc. It must be emphasised that organic farming
does not ensure freedom from nitrate problems. DDT, BHC, Carbamate,
Endosulfan etc. are the most common pesticides used in India. In
agriculture intensive areas of Punjab,
Maharashtra,
and Andhra Pradesh, where fertilizer applications are high, there is
ample evidence of pollution of groundwaters due to nitrates. Even in
semi arid regions of the Deccan plateau, and the arid regions of
Rajasthan, where the intensity of agriculture is less, nitrate leaching
is freely prevalent.
Another
important area is industrial and urban centres, where nitrate pollution
of groundwater has been found rampant. This phenomenon has been
attributed mainly to dumping of animal manure, organic wastes from
industries and sewage on to the soil. In most of the above studies,
nitrate concentrations in groundwater exceeded the permissible limit.
Existing Issues in Nitrate
Contamination
There are mainly
two issues that govern nitrate contamination in the rural areas. Nitrate
pollution can be properly controlled through the appropriate dosage of
fertilisers; crop rotation; proper timing of fertilizer application; use
of organic manure instead of chemical fertilizers; and safe sewage
disposal practices. However, there are no institutional regimes
governing fertiliser use and dumping of animal waste.
An appropriate
step towards evolving measures to prevent and cure groundwater quality
deterioration is Water Quality Monitoring (WQM). However, there
are only few organisations in the country that cover all the essential
parameters for WQM. Due to the lack of reliable WQM facilities,
the data obtained are not decisive on the water quality status which
could be used to facilitate the necessary treatment solutions in a
particular area.
Reducing the Severity on
Humans
Before
adopting the ‘Best Available Technology Not Entailing Excessive Cost’ (BATNEEC)
for decontaminating nitrate-containing drinking water, it is necessary
to minimise nitrate leaching from agricultural as well as
non-agricultural activities at the source. Any change which may involve
conversion from agriculture to non-agricultural use, conversion to
grasslands, change in the cropping system or reduction in the fertiliser
dose involving a reduction in food production, would not be appropriate
in India and other developing countries, where the challenge is to
maximise the food production with no increase in the cultivable land.
In developing
countries, the stress will be on maximising the fertiliser use
efficiency. However, by adopting the following improved methods of
nitrogen fertiliser use, it is possible to minimise nitrate leaching:
● |
substituting part of the inorganic fertilisers with organic
fertilisers, i.e. adopting integrated nutrient management systems. |
● |
matching the plant needs and fertiliser applications by using
appropriate split applications. |
● |
using
slow-release fertilisers (urea-aldehyde polymeric compounds,
coated fertilisers) |
● |
using
nitrification inhibitors and urease inhibitors. |
● |
choosing the right cropping systems and intercepting nitrates by
means of trees/ other deep rooted, nitrate mining crops (e.g.
alfalfa) or by digging ditches. |
● |
establishing proper information systems and monitoring networks. |
● |
creating awareness
in the population in general and farmers in particular. |
It is the ordinary
people who raise the alarm about the poor water quality. In fact civil
society / institutions need to be strengthened to respond to water
quality problems quickly. This is only possible through better knowledge
and information about the nature of groundwater
contamination;
potential sources of threats to groundwater quality in their region and
their degrees of vulnerability; the ill-effects of using contaminated
water; and the possible preventive measures.
The fact, that the
cost of pollution is much less than the cost of its treatment need to be
understood very well and environmental management projects should be
always executed with the total participation of the local bodies and the
concerned NGOs to tackle this havoc..q
Back to Contents |