CoP 9 and Beyond :
Developing Countries' Perspectives
Kalipada Chatterjee
kc@sdalt.ernet.in
The
Conference of the Parties (COPs) of the United Nations
|
Extreme weather
events are expected to occur more often because of climate
change |
Framework
Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), held annually since 1995,
serves a very important common goal and addresses climate change for
the benefit of mankind and the planet Earth.
The
Convention on Climate Change, adopted in Rio in June 1992,
acknowledged that the global nature of climate change calls for the
widest possible cooperation by all countries and their participation
in an effective and appropriate international response, in
accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities,
respective capabilities and social as well as economic conditions.
To
date, the climate change debate has been confined mainly to issues
concerning Annex I countries, particularly their aim of returning to
1990 levels of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions (Article 4.2b)
and the adequacy of their commitment to stabilize atmospheric GHG
concentrations. Another recent focus has been on the compliance of
signatory industrialized countries, who have taken up a common
commitment to reduce their combined GHG emissions by at least 5.2%
compared to the 1990 level, by the year 1998 - 2012.
Up to
COP 8 in Delhi, little concern was shown for the vital issues of
economic and social development and poverty eradication in
developing countries, which constitute 75% of the global
population. For the first time, these aspects were deliberated in
COP 8 and the Delhi Declaration reaffirmed that economic and social
development and poverty eradication are the first and overriding
priorities of developing countries.
The
Third Assessment Report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC) has brought out very clearly that developing countries
are vulnerable to climate change, due to the lack of capacity,
resource constraint, poverty and large population.
In his
COP 8 address, India’s Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee
highlighted the lack of capacity in developing countries to tackle
the adverse impacts of climate change and strongly urged that the
UNFCCC convention
pay more attention to the
aspects of vulnerability and adaptation and stressed the need of
adaptation in the areas of water, energy, health, agriculture, and
biodiversity.
He
also referred to the UN Millennium goal of reducing global poverty
by half by 2015 and further referred to the World Summit on
Sustainable Development, which recognized that poverty eradication,
changing consumption and production patterns, protecting and
managing the natural resource base for economic and social
development are essential requirements for sustainable development.
The
Delhi Declaration (COP 8) called for policies and measures to
protect the climate system against human induced changes and
integrate these with national development programmes, while taking
into account that economic development is essential for adopting
measures to climate change. National sustainable development
strategies should fully integrate climate change objectives in the
key areas such as water, energy, health, agriculture and
biodiversity.
From
the perspective of developing countries, COP 9 should therefore have
the following thrust areas:
q |
Capacity building in the areas of adaptation and the clean
development mechanism (CDM). |
q |
Massive transfer of financial resources from North to South as
well as the transfer of environmentally sound technologies for
rapid economic development in the developing countries to
address their main agenda: poverty eradication and improvement
of the quality of life. |
q |
Creation of a large adaptation fund for the developing countries
to take up research and measures for implementation on
adaptation particularly for the communities and areas vulnerable
to climate change. |
In
addition, an enabling environment at the international and national
levels should be created through the COP 9 process for effective
participation of the developing countries in the CDM of the Kyoto
Protocol.
Capacity building in developing countries
COP 8
highlighted the concerns of the developing counties over their lack
of adequate capacity to respond to the adverse impacts of climate
change.
Adequate capacity building in
developing countries therefore is one of the key areas for COP 9 to
deliberate;
COP 9 should come out
with a concrete and time bound programme on capacity building in
developing countries.
In an
assessment of the capacity building needs of 33 developing
countries, the United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR)
with the Consortium for North-South Dialogue on Climate Change have
brought out the need to build capacities of the developing countries
at the local, national and regional levels so that they can respond
effectively to climate change. The most important conclusion of
this assessment is that increased emphasis on capacity building is a
key component to successful implementation of the Convention and
Protocol in developing countries.
Capacity building in developing countries can also contribute to
national economic development goals to address to poverty
eradication and reduction in the growth rate of greenhouse gases.
Developing countries also need capacity building in the area of CDM
in order to effectively participate nationally and internationally.
However, an enabling environment needs to be in place both at the
host country government level as well as at the CDM Executive Board
(EB) level. Although lax rules will endanger the environmental
integrity of projects, if the CDM EB applies rigorous rules and
scrutiny, initiatives taken by developing countries will be nipped
in the bud and this may prove to be a negative approach. It is
urged that the CDM EB sets up a mechanism during COP9 for
institutional capacity building in developing countries to properly
and efficiently prepare CDM project design documents (PDD) for
submission to the designated national authority (DNA) and CDM EB for
approval and registration. The upfront cost of submission to the
CDM EB must be brought down for small scale CDM projects. COP 9
should encourage the submission of many small scale CDM projects,
which can reinforce sustainable development efforts in developing
countries.
The
following areas in the CDM mechanism need capacity building in
developing countries:
q |
CDM advocacy and awareness generation |
q |
Development of criteria for CDM |
q |
Analysis of CDM eligibility |
q |
Determination of CDM baseline and environmental, financial and
technological additionality (later two additionalities are not
required under the Marrakesh Accords, but DNA in some developing
countries may insist on these additionalities also for the sake
of endorsement) |
Another aspect that needs careful consideration is the issue of CDM
project activities for assisting developing countries to achieve
sustainable development. The Marrakesh Accords have put the
prerogative on the host country to confirm whether a CDM project
activity assists it in achieving sustainable development.
It is
essential that the process of issuance of Carbon Emission Reduction
(CER) credits is linked to the annual monitoring and verification of
achieving sustainable development goals set in the CDM project
document. If this is not integrated with the process of issuance of
CERs, the benefit of CDM to developing countries will be lost. COP
9 and beyond should modify the provisions suitably. Strategy for
capacity building in developing countries.
Key
target audiences for capacity building are middle and senior level
decision makers, policy analysts and implementers in the government,
the private sector and NGOs, as well as in the academic sector.
Tools
and modalities for building capacity in developing countries are
basically activities such as workshops, stakeholder dialogues, human
resource development, the provision of technical assistance and
institutional capacity building.
Few
indicators may be developed by each of the developing countries to
monitor the level of success of capacity building efforts undertaken
nationally, regionally and internationally.
Need for transfer of financial resources from North to South
Massive transfer of financial resources as well as transfer of
environmentally sound technologies (ESTs) from North to South is
another key area that needs to be deliberated upon and decided at
the COP 9. This is in accordance with Article 4.5 under the
Convention, which states that the developed country parties and
other developed Parties included in Annex II of the Convention shall
take all practical steps to promote, facilitate and finance as
appropriate, the transfer of or access to environmentally sound
technologies and know-how to other parties, particularly developing
country parties, to enable them to implement the provision of the
Convention. This provision was further strengthened in the COP 8
Delhi Declaration, which states that the Annex I Parties should
further implement their commitments under the Convention,
particularly those relating to the provision of financial resources,
technology transfer and capacity building.
Adaptation and developing countries
One of
most important decisions taken during COP 8 and reflected in the
Delhi Declaration is in the area of adaptation to climate change.
It states that adaptation to the adverse effects of climate change
is of high priority, particularly for the developing countries that
are most vulnerable to climate change, as brought out in the IPCC
Report (2002). The developing countries will be worst affected by
climate change. The developing countries have very little capacity
to adapt and cope with climate change due to various factors such as
low levels of wealth, technologies, education, information skills,
infrastructure and access to resources.
It is
widely accepted that enhancing adaptive capacity involves national
efforts similar to the principles of sustainable development, such
as social development, economic development, environmental
protection and conservation and technological innovation and
development. COP 8 decided that effective and result-based measures
should be supported for the development of approaches at all levels
on adaptation and capacity building for the integration of
adaptation concerns into sustainable development strategies.
COP 9
may formalize an adaptation policy and measures for developing
countries. To decide which adaptation opportunities will have the
greatest value, emphasis must be given to characteristics such as
resilience, critical thresholds and coping ranges. These attributes
are highly dependent on regions even among developing countries.
Lessons learned from past experiences and traditional adaptation
practices by communities can provide an understanding of the
processes of adaptation to climate change.
Important measures that would enhance adaptation capacity in the
vulnerable countries and communities, particularly in developing
countries, are:
1. |
Research |
Current knowledge of adaptation and adaptive capacity is
insufficient for rigorous evaluation of planned adaptation
measures and policies of governments. Further research is
required in the areas of climate change and adaptation in the
areas of : |
(i) |
water and water conservation |
(ii) |
agriculture and food security; |
(iii) |
human health; |
(iv) |
economic losses due to extreme climatic/weather events such as
droughts, floods, cyclones etc. to incorporate these findings in
the national policies and measures for adaptation to climate
change in developing countries. |
2.
Capacity building in developing countries and tools for adaptation
There
is a need to strengthen the capacity of the developing countries in
coping with the adverse impacts of climate change. Adaptive
capacity can be enhanced by adopting certain tools.
Tools
that may be useful for developing countries for adaptation to
climate change in addition to research on adaptation include the
following:
q |
Increasing the resilience and coping capacity of communities |
q |
Education, training and public awareness |
q |
Sustainable livelihoods practice |
q |
Cooperative efforts |
q |
Insurance against loss (e.g. crop insurance) |
q |
Technological intervention (e.g. using renewable energy for
irrigation) |
Measuring Success
Success of an adaptation programme will result from an appropriate
combination of the various tools mentioned above. Indicators of
success should be built into any adaptation programme to monitor its
efficacy. Some useful indicators that may be used to monitor such
an adaptation programme are:
q |
Poverty reduction, by measuring the proportion of the population
below the poverty line (below US$1 a day per capita income)
every five years |
q |
Measuring improvement of general public awareness on climate
change as a percentage of the total population |
q |
Measuring the increase in awareness on climate change amongst
civil society, policy makers, regulators and industries |
q |
Climate change introduced in the lower, middle and high school
curriculum |
q |
A
proportion of land area covered by forests and the land area
protected for biological diversity |
q |
Per capita carbon dioxide emissions |
q |
Gross domestic product measured as per unit of energy use |
q |
Measurement of the prevalence and death rates associated with
malaria |
q |
Proportion of population with sustainable access to safe water. |
Cost
of adaptation programme for developing countries
Article 4.4 under the Convention, which specifies the commitments of
the Annex II countries, states that the developed country Parties
and other developed Parties under the Convention are required to
assist the
developing country Parties that are
particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects climate change in
meeting costs of adaptation.
Further, the Marrakesh Accords decided that an adaptation fund shall
be established to finance concrete adaptation projects and
programmes in developing country Parties that are party to the
Protocol, and the Annex I Parties ratifying the Protocol were
invited to provide funding for adaptation in developing countries,
in addition to the share (2%) proceeds on CDM (Decision-/CP.7).
COP 9
is urged to not only to review funding under the Kyoto Protocol, but
also to fulfill the commitment of the Annex II countries under the
Convention in meeting the costs of adaptation to climate change in
developing countries.
Further, the Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF), which was set up in
the Marrakesh Accords (COP 7), may be used specially for adaptation
until a full fledged adaptation fund is set in place. Any further
delay in establishing an adaptation fund may endanger the lives and
properties of millions of people and vulnerable communities in the
developing countries.
Conclusion
Developing countries have waited for the last 12 years for action on
the question of capacity building, transfer of technology, financial
resources to deal with climate change and setting up a large
adaptation fund.
COP 9
is urged to take decisions on action-oriented and time bound
programmes in this regard, with definite tools to monitor the
progress and success. It is also urged that the official delegation
from developing countries in COP 9 raise the issues brought out in
this paper
“COP 9 and Beyond: Developing
countries' perspectives”
for a time bound
action programme and decisions.
r
Back to Contents
|