Jal-TARA Arsenic Kit
Manoj
kumar
mkumar@sdalt.ernet.in
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ground
water is an important source of domestic water in West Bengal and
Bangladesh, but it is now clear that much of the ground water in these
areas is contaminated with naturally occurring arsenic. Out of 20
countries in different parts of the world where ground water arsenic
contamination and human sufferings have been reported so far, the
magnitude is considered highest in Bangladesh, followed by West Bengal.
About 6 million people in West Bengal and 25 million in Bangladesh are
at present drinking water contaminated with arsenic at a level above
50ppb.
Sources
of arsenic pollution
Arsenic
is a naturally occurring element in the earth’s crust. It occurs as a
major constituent in more than 200 minerals, including elemental
arsenic, arsenides, sulphides, oxides, arsenates and arsenites. In West
Bengal and Bangladesh, it is believed that arsenic is largely due to the
erosion from local rocks. Increased ground water extraction has caused
this problem by dropping the ground water level in much of the region.
Effected
locations
High
concentrations of arsenic have been reported in eight districts of West
Bengal and one district each from Bihar and Madhya Pradesh. Bangladesh
is also adversely affected by high arsenic content in ground water. Out
of a total of 188 million people in West Bengal and Bangladesh, 136
million people live in arsenic affected districts where ground water
contains arsenic level above 50ppb. Detailed description of arsenic
affected areas and population in West Bengal and Bangladesh are given in
the table provided below.
Sl.No. |
Physical Parameters |
West Bengal |
Bangladesh |
1 |
Area in Sq.Km. |
89,193 |
148,393 |
2 |
Area of arsenic
affected dists. In Sq.Km |
38,865 |
112,407 |
3 |
Population in Million |
68 |
120 |
4 |
Population of arsenic
affected dists. In million. |
42.7 |
93.4 |
5 |
Total number of dists. |
18 |
64 |
6 |
No. of As affected
dists(>10ppb) |
9 |
54 |
7 |
No. of As affected
dists(>50ppb) |
74 |
178 |
8 |
No of As affected
Villages(>10ppb) |
Apprx.2600 |
Apprx.2000 |
Guidelines and Standards
There
is a big argument about the permissible limits of arsenic in drinking
water in India and Bangladesh. Both the countries have a standard of
0.05mg/l, but WHO guidelines value is 0.01mg/l. There are two key
arguments in the debate. The WHO guideline value is derived from the
studies of health effects of arsenic, and is based on a 70 Kg person
drinking two litres of water a day over his/ her life span. However,
people in rural India and Bangladesh tend to drink more than this
because of the heat and lack of cheap alternatives. There is also
evidence that people with poor nutrition levels are more affected by
arsenic contamination than healthy people. Therefore, a given level of
arsenic in drinking water in India and Bangladesh, where there are
millions of malnourished people drinking large quantities of water
daily, is likely to be far more dangerous than a similar concentration
in Europe or the USA, and thus arsenic standards in India and Bangladesh
should be lower than the international standards.
The second argument makes a case for
keeping the current standard of 0.05mg/l, due to practical and economic
difficulties associated with a lower standard, and the risk of adverse
social impact.
Impacts
of arsenic contamination
The main
arsenic ingestion mediums are drinking water, food and road side dust,
while contribution of road side dust is very small; the other two play a
very-very important role. Long term ingestion of high arsenic
concentration (>50ppb) water results in Arsenicosis,
Hyperpigmentation, Depigmentation, Keratosis and
peripheral vascular disorders are the most commonly reported symptoms of
chronic arsenic exposure. It is estimated that in West Bengal two
million people are at health risk due to ingestion of arsenic water.
Status
of monitoring and Surveillance efforts
The major challenge is how to rapidly reduce and monitor the arsenic
consumption of millions of people scattered over a huge area. The
respective governments, external support agencies and non-governmental
organizations are already pooling their resources to determine the
extent of ground water contamination, and develop long term solutions to
the problem. However, it has been estimated that it may take 10 to 15
years to provide sustainable arsenic free water supply options to all
the threatened areas.
One of
the current priorities is to check existing tube wells for arsenic
contamination, and to set up sustainable arsenic monitoring systems. In
addition arsenic removal technologies need to be monitored to ensure
that arsenic is consistently removed to below permissible limits.
Need for
extensive monitoring
Arsenic
is poisonous even at extremely low concentrations. Standards for safe
levels of arsenic in drinking water vary from around five parts per
billion to 50 parts per billion. The standard set by WHO is 0 parts per
billion and BIS is 50 parts per billion. Thus, devices that can reliably
measure arsenic down to these levels are essential.
|
|
Keratosis |
Leukomelanosiss |
Development Alternative’s initiative
Keeping
all this in view, the Environment Systems Branch at Development
Alternatives has developed an Arsenic field testing potable kit for
determining the presence of Arsenic and proper monitoring.
Salient
Features of the kit
Jal-TARA Arsenic kit is cost effective, potable, compact
and easy to operate. This kit will help in identifying the problematic
water sources and enable communities to take the appropriate safety
measures to treat water for removal of Arsenic. The various components
of the kit have been packaged in a sturdy, elegant and water proof bag.
The kit contains enough reagents to test 50 samples and the shelf life
of the various reagents is over six months. For each test, appropriate
safety measures are given in the user’s manual. Arrangement has been
made for refilling the reagents.
Some
of the advantages of using our Arsenic testing kit are |
● |
Very simple to use
and user friendly |
● |
Cost effective |
● |
Indigenous |
● |
Broad test range
(10ppb, 20ppb, 50ppb, 200ppb, 500ppb) |
● |
No false negative
results |
● |
Good reproducibility at lower
concentrations ☼ |
Back to Contents
|