magine 
            waking up one day to find India with only 30 million people, 70 per 
            cent of the land under forests and 97 per cent of the land owned and 
            controlled by communities. That is PNG, albeit on a much smaller 
            scale. This country, with a land area of nearly half a million 
            square kilometers, has only 4 million people organised around 
            language groups. In this nation of 700 languages with incredible 
            cultural diversity, are found several endemic floral and faunal 
            species, including the exotic Birds of Paradise.
            
            For us in India, as in most other Asian 
            societies, the country is interesting for the communal nature of 
            land ownership. Even the forests are owned by the people. The state 
            has the right to only the minerals below the ground. The communal 
            nature of land ownership implies total control and rights, for 
            instance to convert forests to other uses or sell it to logging 
            companies. Contrast this with India where the state is the absolute 
            owner of forests with the people enjoying minor concessions. And 
            even then, there are frequent conflicts and clashes between the 
            forest department and the people. 
            
            Interestingly, however, in PNG ownership rights 
            to forest also mean that local people can sell these rights. And 
            they often do so.
            
            As a result, the forest area in PNG has been 
            declining due to conversion to gardens and plantations of coconut, 
            coffee and palm, and logging and mining. One of the biggest threats 
            is the large scale logging of timber, estimated at more than 2 
            million cubic metres annually. Such logging is said to be 
            environmentally destructive. Further, most of the economic gains 
            have been captured by the logging companies and, of late, by the 
            government in the form of an export tax. Due to lack of expertise, 
            skills and experience the people have usually got a bad deal 
            (estimates suggest communities get $ 5 of the export price of 
            $150-200 per cubic metre).
            
            Hence, secure tenure has neither led to 
            conservation nor have the local people got many benefits. Some have 
            even found themselves in debt and the little money they received has 
            been frittered away. The government’s attempt to intervene to 
            regulate the logging concessions, ostensibly to protect the 
            environment and to generate more revenue are a source of tension as 
            local groups strive to retain control over their resources.
            
            It is against this background that the 
            Biodiversity Conservation Network (BCN) works with local partners to 
            establish and evaluate an enterprise-based approach to conservation. 
            BCN funds have been used to support scientific research stations and 
            eco-tourism businesses in PNG. Both involve the establishment of 
            lodges and support services as guides and porters. Units for the 
            manufacture and marketing of artifacts, have also been set up.
            
            The most interesting of these enterprises is the 
            seemingly incongruous logging project. This BCN supported business 
            is an attempt at giving communities the capacity to undertake small 
            scale logging. Local groups are provided with the means to acquire 
            portable saw mills. Seven to eight people typically work to cut, 
            transport and saw wood. The wood is usually supplied to the local 
            market, unlike the larger companies, which export the wood.
            
            The enterprises have achieved mixed success. One 
            particularly successful unit has, over the past few years, 
            accumulated enough surplus to purchase a plantation (valued at 
            $10,000) which had been sold nearly half a century ago to some 
            outsiders. It is also starting to pay back the loan it took to 
            acquire the saw mill. At some sites, spin-off enterprises like a 
            bakery and sewing businesses have been started. Other units are, 
            however, struggling to establish their businesses.
            
            Information on the environmental impact of the 
            portable saw mills is scanty. Casual evidence suggests that the 
            impact is minimal, if for no other reason than the limited scale of 
            operation of the mills. A portable mill can cut a tree or two per 
            week, generating between 0.8 to 1.2 cubic metres of finished timber. 
            Allowing for down time for repairs and maintenance and other 
            interruptions, the average is considerably lower. With the limited 
            density of population (small communities of a few hundred people 
            control literally thousands of hectares of forests), there is 
            unlikely to be a marked adverse impact on the forests for a long 
            time.
            
            Apart from generating cash income, the projects 
            also work to upgrade the technical and business skills of the local 
            communities. Perhaps, the most significant advantage is the 
            demonstration of an alternative to large scale logging, even though 
            they are as yet not in a position to satisfy international demand 
            for sawn wood.
            
            Although it is too early to say whether these 
            community-based timber production enterprises will lead to long-term 
            sustainable harvests, they are, at a minimum, contributing to 
            conservation by:
            
              
                | ► | keeping the 
                communities from selling their forest lands to the commercial 
                logging firms | 
              
                | ► | providing 
                information that BCN and its partners can use to understand the 
                conditions under which enterprise-based approaches to 
                conservation do and do not work. |