First Consultation on
National Rejuvenation
through democratic restructuring
at the Parliament
Annexe on March 8 1997
People First
Opening
Observations
Shri Sunil Shastri,
Chairman,
Lal Bahadur
Shastri Memorial Foundation |
|
Dear
Friends,
In a
few months from now, we will be completing 50 years of independence.
It is time that we take stock of how we, as a nation and as a
people, have performed during the past half century after we gained
control over our own destiny.
As
matters stand today, it appears that in the next few years things
might get even worse than they have been over the past half
century. During recent years, the people, both rich and poor, have
become restive and cynical. They mostly blame the leadership. The
leadership itself is confused. The prime minister recently made a
statement lamenting his helplessness as all his options stood closed
because of commitments made in the past. If the prime minister
publicly expresses his helplessness, who will solve the problems of
the nation and the people?
Preparatory Consultation
A preparatory consultation was held on March 1, 1997 at the
premises of the World Wide Fund for Nature-India, in which
over 50 political leaders, professionals, academics and NGOs
actively participated. The consultation was informal and
highly interactive with all the participants contributing
constructively to the deliberations.
The preparatory consultation adopted a statement urging the
main consultation to endorse the reforms necessary for
rejuvenating the nation through empowering the people at the
local level on the lines envisioned by Gandhiji. To achieve
these reforms, the consultation also called for nationwide
social mobilisation in the Gandhian way. |
It is
obvious that we cannot resolve our failure unless we first
understand the reasons for it. Some leaders favour the presidential
system. If the elected president continues to handle local matters,
it will probably increase irresponsible decision-making. Some people
say that in a society fractured by communal tension and caste
differences, it would not be wise to give wide powers to the
villages. But then, who understood the common people, their social
tensions, economic problems and aspirations more than Gandhiji? Do
we think that he evolved his concept without being aware of the
problems of social discord in them? The fact is that often higher
level politics gets linked with the rural overlords who exploit the
poor. The only way to prevent such exploitation is by giving power
to the local common people.
The
simple structure proposed by Gandhiji consists of fully empowered
district governments which handle all district level matters
including administration of law, police, justice and forests. The
district governments then nurture gram panchayats to function, as
stated by Gandhiji, virtually as self-sustaining republics.
Sponsoring Organisations
Lal
Bahadur Shastri Memorial Foundation, National Foundation for India,
World Wide Fund for Nature-India, Consumer Coordination Council,
Sulabh International and Consortium for Voluntary Action and People
First
The people are primarily concerned with local matters in their day
to day life. The rest, they read in the newspapers. Once district
governments are constituted, the people will hardly have to go to
the state or national capital for any work. The state and national
leaders will then have the time and resources to develop sound
legislation and infrastructure which has been badly neglected in the
past.
Based on colonial practices, a bulk of the resources is presently
with the central government which devolves them to the state and
local governments through a complex process involving excessive
overheads, wastage, misuse and corruption. Gandhiji’s view was that
the district governments should control land and all other local
resources. The state governments should also control adequate tax
sources to meet their development needs. It should be necessary for
the centre to provide funds only to the backward states. Will this
not be a much simpler arrangement?
We
are speedily denuding our forests leading to huge huge
environmental losses. The forests can obviously be best managed by
the district government with the involvement of the village
communities. Would this not be a much simpler and efficient system?
The change process will be difficult and harsh. Restructuring will
require total ideological and political commitment by all parties.
The left parties have already strongly opposed reduction of posts in
government. We request them to appreciate that no government can
create within itself, employment for everyone. It should spend less
on itself and more on enabling the poor to take care of their needs.
Once the people are returned their right to make decisions about
local matters, they will generate wealth for the nation. It will
also strengthen local cultures, values and traditional wisdom,
reduce communal disharmony and integrate the nation.
Our fight is against capitalism and poverty. The economic reforms,
though desirable, have opened the doors wide open for multinationals
and foreign investors. They have better laws and privileges in their
countries. Our entrepreneurs are at a disadvantage. This year’s
budget has given them some relief. They need a level playing field.
However, opening the market will lead to exploitative unsustainable
capitalism which can be regulated only by empowering our own people.
All political parties are committed to eradicating poverty and
promoting equity. The only difference lies in the means to realise
this end. Ideologically, Gandhiji’s concept of decentralised
socialism provides an excellent set of ground rules under which all
political parties can pursue their individual ideologies.
Today, the people are concerned about the quality of leadership.
Local empowerment will nurture values. Clear definition of roles and
open decision-making will promote accountability. Both will
encourage good leadership.
Political presence and authority will increase at all levels.
Bureaucratic presence and authority will become minimal. Most
political parties will be in power in some district or the other and
thus involved in nation building. All political parties and
legislators will be on a level playing field while canvassing for
elections.
Reduction in overheads and wastage and huge huge
environmental losses will release enormous resources for
development. The local people controlling education, will educate
themselves and stabilise the population.
Way back in 1963, Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru wrote to the chief
ministers that the centralised model of development had failed and
that following Gandhiji may perhaps have been better. Shall we
listen to him now? The consultation may ponder over these thoughts.
Are they not simple and wholesome?
People First, represented by Dr Ashok Khosla and SK Sharma, has done
pathbreaking work in bringing back Gandhiji to us. We are deeply
obliged to the leaders of various political parties and the members
of the civil society for participating in this consultation. We are
also extremely grateful to the media for its support. We hope that
it will set up an ongoing campaign on the recommendations which
emerge from this consultation.
Friends, the challenge before us, especially the political parties,
is to bring the people out of their shells and regenerate their
suppressed energies for building the nation. Gandhiji’s
decentralised socialism can charge the whole nation into action. q
Jai Hind, Jai Jawan, Jai Kisan.
Sunil Shastri, Chairman
Lal Bahadur Shastri Memorial Foundation
Back to Contents
|