| 
  
  Natural Resource Management
 Management of natural resources 
  through people’s participation is gradually being accepted as an effective 
  strategy to arrest and reverse the alarming rate of resource degradation and 
  its economic and environmental consequences.
 
 The important factors which have contributed to this awareness include the 
  increasing realisation concerning the limitations of the State interventions 
  in managing local resources without involving local communities; the 
  rediscovery of the rationale and mechanisms behind traditional systems of 
  common property resources management; advocacy by grassroots non-government 
  organisations for local resource management and the successful experiences of 
  recent initiatives involving approaches to development and management of 
  natural resources through community forestry programmes, community irrigation 
  systems, user group-managed pasture development, joint management of forests 
  in Asia and other parts of the developed world.
 
 These recent initiatives however remained country specific and in many 
  instances went undocumented.  This obstructs both the replication of these 
  successes as well as the evolution of mechanisms which could help in 
  collective thinking to guide future work related to people-centred, 
  participatory management of natural resources.
 
 To address the lacuna ICIMOD -- whose mandate is to help promote the 
  development of an economically and environmentally sound mountain ecosystem 
  and to improve the living standards of mountain populations in the Hindu Kush 
  Himalayas -- has established a programme which will aim to encourage 
  participatory natural resource management in the countries of Afghanistan, 
  Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, India, Myanmar, Nepal and Pakistan.
 
 For more information contact Anupam Bhatia, Regional Coordinator, 
  Participatory  Natural Resource Management Programme, ICIMOD, GPO Box 3226, 
  Kathmandu, Nepal.
 
 
    
    
      
        | 
        Ecosystem Health |  
        | 1. 
        Environment is not understood well in development and 
        there exists a need to develop a more integrated approach. 
 2. 
        Ecosystems health is an integrated and useful framework 
        principle for understanding the integral relationship between people and 
        nature, however there are few existing tools of analysis.
 
 3. 
        Human health, which includes both the physiological and 
        psychological dimensions is a very effective indicator of the wealth  of 
        the environment.
 
 4. 
        Health, however, is largely understood and related with 
        manifested diseases in a restricted sense and needs to be equated with 
        overall well-being of people, their physical, mental and social health.
 | 5. 
        Technology needs to be re-oriented to meet common people’s needs and 
        aspirations. 
 6. 
        There is a need for an analytical framework that can 
        adequately address the issue of environmental quality and equity.
 
 7. 
        Ecosystem’s decline needs to be perceived more in terms 
        of the telling effect on people’s health and well being than on natural 
        environment per se.
 
 8. In the light of 
        globalisation of environmental issues that resulted in the International 
        Earth Summit, South Countries need to have a clear-cut perspective on 
        environment and development and its effect on the needs and aspirations 
        of our people.
 
 |  
        |  | An extract from the 
        highlights of the plenary session from the report " Ecosystems Health ". 
        For details contact South-South Solidarity, Safdarjung Development Area, 
        New Delhi - 110016 |  
  
 
  Back
  to Contents
    
  
      
     |