| GREENS AND
  BUSINESS
  WE NEED DIALOGUE
 "Environmental
  economics could be the common language for a dialogue between
  environmentalists and industrialists"Dr. Martin Holdgate, Director General, IUCN
 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
 There can be no doubt that the world will rapidly industrialize during the
  coming decades. The billions of people living in poverty in the developing
  countries will accept no less. Depending on how it is managed, this
  industrialisation will create a better quality of life for everyone- or an
  environmental disaster of unimaginable dimensions.
 
 Because the stakes are so high, it is urgent that we all work together to
  solve our environmental problems. The business community must invent new
  industrial technologies that reduce pollution and consume less energy and
  other natural resources. At the same time, governments must devise workable
  regulatory regimes and economic incentives, and environmentalists must promote
  analysis and understanding of environmental issues.
 
 Unfortunately, industrialists and environmentalists do not always work
  together effectively. Dialogue often breaks down for two reasons. The first
  relates to the divisions within each of the two communities. For example,
  while some corporations energetically pursue low waste technologies and
  evaluate the environmental impact of their products, others merely seek to
  avoid legal penalties. Some firms, whether financially weak or simply
  unscrupulous, choose to ignore their environmental responsibilities.
 
 Similarly, the environmental movement has been described as an extremely broad
  church. Some environmental groups are convinced that corporations are valuable
  allies in the fight to save the environment; they influence business through
  moral persuasion. Others suspect that companies use their knowledge and public
  relations skills to evade rather than to met their environmental obligations;
  these groups play a positive role by challenging the blander assertions of
  governments and firms and making the public more environmentally aware.
 
 A second and more profound barrier to communication is that environmentalists
  and industrialists speak different languages. This is because most people in
  industry are trained in law, economics, engineering or technology. Members of
  the conservation and environment movement tend to be educated in biology, the environmental
  sciences, or the social sciences.
 
 The common language that could span this divide is that of environmental
  economics. As environmentalists, we must accept that economics will remain
  central to the decision making of business and government. For their part,
  industrialists must recognize the weaknesses in current economic science.
  Environmental resources are rarely valued correctly, and economic measures
  such as GNP are transparently absurd form and environmental standpoint. By
  incorporating environmental and quality-of-life values into economic equation,
  we can remove many of the distortions that now bias policy making.
 
 Depending on how it is managed, this industrialisation will create a better
  quality of life for everyone - or an environmental disaster of unimaginable
  dimensions. Improved dialogue between environmentalists and industrialists
  must begin with the mutual acceptance of each other’s integrity and ethics.
  We all share the same basic desire for a beautiful world, a high quality of
  life and sustainable economic growth. To realize this vision, we should avoid
  endless debates over general values and focus instead on specific issues. This
  approach is working well at the federal and provincial levels in Canada, where
  people from industry, conservation groups, government and local communities
  meet for face -to-face roundtable discussions.
 
 Such talks will not, of course, replace communication and the sharing of ‘best
  practice’ ideas within the corporate community. But it would be
  counterproductive if industrialists spoke only among themselves in a closed
  circle about their successes. A broader dialogue would have the double
  advantage of educating environmentalists about business problems while
  challenging firms to boost their environmental performance.
 
 Courtesy : World Link
  No. 5
 
 
 
    
      
        | Development Alternatives', a symbol is a
          5-pointed star depicting a stylised human figure with its arms
          stretched outward, its head pointing skyward, and its feet firmly
          rooted in the earth. |  
  
 
 Back
  to Contents
    
  
      
     |