| Industry for
            Sustainable Development Ashok Khosla The
            first step towards sustainable development is to create sustainable
            livelihoods. A sustainable livelihood is simply a job. But it is a
            job that is meaningful and remunerative and does not destroy the
            resource base of the community or country. Sustainable
            livelihoods produce goods and services that are needed to better the
            lives of the people. At the same time, they create purchasing power,
            and with it greater economic and social equity. Being
            environment-friendly, they minimize waste, use renewables and
            residues and generally conserve resources. To
            break out of the present poverty-pollution-population trap, India
            needs to create, in as short a time as possible — say, ten years
            — some one hundred million sustainable livelihoods to cover the
            backlog, plus a similar number for the new entrants into the job
            market. With this many jobs created, each family in the country can
            hope to have one member with a reasonably paid job. Neither
            current national development policies, nor the activities of the
            corporate sector are geared to achieve this kind of goal. Given the
            present direction, we will be fortunate if together they are able to
            create ten percent of the sustainable livelihoods needed in the
            country at the end of the decade. To bring these jobs into the
            economy, these tens of millions of jobs each year, no number of big
            dam, vast factories, mega power stations and huge chemical
            complexes, even in the aggregate, can begin to make a dent. The
            formal sector is geared to deal primarily with the demands of the
            urban rich and the problems of the industry that aims to satisfy
            them Creating jobs for the poor or protecting the resource base on
            which the poor depend is not one of these. On the contrary, their
            primary goal is to minimise labour problems by maximising
            automation-and to pass the environmental cost And who else, if not
            the poor? The
            answer lies elsewhere, far outside the imagination of our planners
            and decision makers. It lies in small scale, decentralized
            industries of a new kind. Such (mini or micro) industries must use
            good technology to raise productivity and local resources to make
            products and services that satisfy the needs of local people without
            destroying the environment. But any economist will quickly assure
            you that small industries spread all over the countryside cannot
            "compete" with the economies of large scale urban
            production. And that is correct, except for the wrong reason. It is
            not the economics of scale that makes large corporations more
            effective and profitable, but the massive subsidies they extract
            from society; subsidies in access to infrastructure, subsidies in
            cheap finance, subsidies in under priced and more reliable energy,
            and subsidies in a thousand other ways, not to mention direct
            manipulation of the financial and power structure to their
            advantage. All
            the small enterprise needs to beat the large corporation at its own
            game is better access than it has today to technology, finance (not
            necessarily cheaper finance), and marketing channels. The primary
            role of the public sector in facilitating these is to provide basic
            infrastructure for communication and transportation. The myth of the
            "economies of scale" that justifies the bulk of national
            investment going into urban infrastructure and institutions is as
            hollow as it is deeply embedded in a manifestly bankrupt theory of
            development economics. The
            design of rural enterprises is a complex, still unfamiliar business.
            They have to master the technology-environment-finance-marketing
            linkages, while keeping their overhead costs low. They must do this
            without access to engineers, management specialists, friendly
            bankers or market infrastructure. Either for buying raw materials or
            for selling products. An interesting solution to these seemingly
            insuperable obstacles lies in building franchised networks of small,
            private enterprises capable of growing and processing biomass to
            manufacture products for both the urban and local markets. To be
            successful, the franchise arrangement will have to provide high
            technological and marketing inputs and access to capital. Taking
            the complete cycle from biomass generation to end-product use,
            entire jobs can be created at costs of a few thousand rupees, the
            environment can be enriched at no cost at all, and the basic needs
            of whole communities can be met through the additional purchasing
            The handmade, recycled paper unit at TARA demonstrates the
            possibilities in this direction. q Back
            to Contents |