Sustainable Technology approach to Human Development
Dr Devendra Kumar
Dr Devendra Kumar, popularly known as Devendra
Bhai, has been engaged in the field of sustainable development for
the last 50 years. He has worked with Gandhiji and is currently
Director of the Centre of Science for Villages in Wardha,
Maharashtra.
The Indian National Science Academy (INSA)
recently presented Dr Kumar with the annual B D Tilak Award for
Rural Development. Presented below are excerpts from his Award
lecture:
A
holistic civilisation is one where human development potentialities
are such that individuals are able to express their inner talents
fully. In such a holistic development, the individuals help in the
creation of a happy and peaceful community. At the same time, they
bring about an ecologically prosperous natural environment which
nurtures them. Hence, the interests of the individual and society
and humans and nature become congruent.
Such an
ideal civilisation could be developed on an economic system with
technologies and modes of production which are more participatory,
egalitarian and mutually cooperative in their economic, political
and social milieu. However, what we have at present is a mode which
goads us to a quantitative increase in consumption and convenience
at the cost of the very quality of life and of balances in nature.
The questions which need to be considered is how we could move in
the right direction and what are the helpful signs that are evident
today which could help us to do so.
The
trend of development of human knowledge (science) and skills
(technology) has been consistently in the direction of seeking more
comforts, conveniences and control on the natural environment. As
more and more human interference with the natural order took place,
the divergence widened between the interests of nature and human
beings. Effects of this interference have ultimately created a
catastrophic situation for both of them.
Unfortunately, the ecological balances that govern the
sustainability in nature’s economy were never given much
consideration in human history. Even though there was evidence of
civilisations fading when they overexploited the resources on which
they depended, narrow self interests and a short range perspective
continued to rule human aspirations. Consequently, the
sustainability aspect remained subservient to profitability.
The
results are glaringly evident. Take, for instance, the denudation of
tree cover or the drying up of hydrological resources due to wrong
and excessive use of fresh water resources. There are other signs
too: soil erosion, the extinction of many species. Then there is the
pollution of our oceans, earth and air, the destruction of the ozone
layer and the increase in waste fuelled by excessive consumption.
These disturbing trends have made the global community sit up and
think about the direction our civilisation is going. However, all
these imbalances have not yet led us to radically change the
direction of development towards a more sustainable economy. The
powerful commercial and political vested interests who profit from
the present system and the people who enjoy the luxuries seem to
favour its continuance.
This
thinking nurtures the old attitude towards nature as an unlimited
source to be exploited for human need and greed. The new awakening
to move towards a more permanent and sustainable economy will,
therefore, take some time to bring visible results.
In
fact, nature has to be considered as the whole, of which human
beings form one component. As a very important component, they are
meant to serve nature rather than make it subservient to their own
needs and wants. The human species, with all its attributes of
intelligence, inventiveness and capacity of intervention, should
have used these qualities in a positive manner to serve the whole of
which they are a part. Instead of exploiting nature for their self
interest, they should have acted as sentinels of nature and help
maintain the multifarious delicate webs of the eco-systems that make
it function in a sustainable manner. In the same vein, we could
learn from the bees the manner to serve nature and get its
sustenance simultaneously. The more honey it collects from flowers,
the more it serves in the propagation of the plants by helping in
their cross fertilisation. We could emulate the bees by fulfilling
our needs through a similar symbiotic relationship with nature.
This is
the challenge to human civilisation and must be met by changing
attitudes and actions, particularly by the science and technology
community. The science and technology field has a greater duty to
help in changing the course of this self destructive or
non-sustainable industrial commercial era.
As we
review the present pattern of human settlements, we find a constant
and rapid movement of population towards large cities, leaving less
and less people living in small communities or villages. In this
process, the process of sharing and proximity to nature are
sacrificed at the altar of material conveniences. The ill effects of
this concentration of populations away from nature and each other
are evident. What needs to be realised is that the future lies not
in the megalopolises but in small communities living in natural
settings.
In
order to achieve this, we need to hasten the process of
decentralisation in production and supply of energy and fuel; food,
clothing and shelter; transport and travel communication and
culture; management of goods and governments; education, training,
research and in all other conceivable dimensions of life. In this
regard, India stands at a pivotal point in the history of human
growth. Amongst the countries with a fair level of science and
technology infrastructure, India alone has (unlike the highly
industrialised and urbanised countries) almost two-thirds of its
people living in villages and thus retains the option to manoeuvre a
change from the present non sustainable path to a more sustainable
one.
Since
science and technology are the engines which drive the economic life
of a country and determine the direction of its social, cultural and
political milieu, each new invention which helps in this change is
welcome. The advent of computers and satellites, for example, is a
welcome development. Likewise, various other new S & T inputs are
now available to us which can take us to our cherished goal
The
dwindling mineral resources, especially fossil fuels, the search for
renewable alternatives and the worldwide concern for environmental
problems has encouraged attempts in the direction of decentralised
low energy, low capital, sustainable and widely replicable
technologies. The involvement of S&T (Science & Technology)
institutions has been quite significant but not as much as its
should be. Several points need to be kept in mind in the Indian
scenario:
u |
Unless there is
interaction between S & T experts with those working at the
grassroots level and they learn to understand each other’s
language, no real solution can be found. |
u |
Any new technology
for the villages requires the first generation of its users to
adjust themselves to it as much as the technology has to be
optimised to their needs progressively. |
u |
The technique that
is developed to provide livelihoods for the underprivileged
requires, apart from the technological input, a management input
to make it commercially viable. It is evident that enlightened
commercial experts have not come forward to help in this task as
much as desired. |
u |
The techniques which
households can use to improve their lives, for instance,
smokeless wood stoves, biogas plants and soakage pits for
household effluents, can be introduced initially by government
and non-government agencies, but their multiplication and
maintenance requires that the technique is turned into a new
trade which can generate livelihoods for people. Unfortunately,
this has not happened so far. |
u |
New artisanal trades
need to be developed in the villages so that more people have
full time employment. Artisans, ideally, should not need to
employ labourers but have partners and disciples. If the
employer-employee relationship is avoided, as far as possible,
it will result in a non-exploitative economy and harmonious
relationship. |
u |
The old order of
artisanal trades has to be upgraded in the light of higher level
of technologies by the use of electricity and improved tools and
new materials. This may require the development of an
infrastructure not currently available in every village. |
u |
The term
decentralisation also needs to be interpreted scientifically. It
is a term relative to the subject we are relating it with. The
degree of decentralisation will vary with the latter. The
principle of self sufficiency or Swadeshi is also related with
decentralisation. Both are two sides of the same coin and the
degree of decentralisation will determine its area of self
sufficiency. |
To
conclude, I would say that the goal of holistic human development—by
which I mean the physical, emotional, intellectual and spiritual
dimensions added together—could be achieved by humanity through
scientific methods which fulfil our physical needs from nature. This
should be in a way that we are at peace with nature, at peace with
our emotional needs by maintaining peace between the individual and
society. Also we should strive for intellectual and spiritual peace. q
Notable New Book
The book
"Activities
Implemented Jointly to Mitigate Climate Change: Developing
Countries Perspectives", edited by Kalipada Chatterjee and
published by Development Alternatives,
has been featured
in the International Institute for Sustainable Development’s
"Notable New Books". The recently published book has been sent
to the Institute’s listing "New & Notable from the IISD."
Some excerpts from
IISD’s comments: This third international conference on joint
implementation undertaken by the Joint Implementation Network
(JIN) addressed the barriers to the execution of Activities
Implemented Jointly (AIJ) projects in developing countries.
Conference participation was broad and included 160
participants from the developing regions of Asia-Pacific,
Africa and Latin America, as well as 46 from North America,
Europe, Australia and Japan. Governments, NGOs, academia and
international organisations were represented.
Few AIJ projects are
officially recognised by the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), yet AIJ has a strong
potential to bring together developing and developed countries
to meet common needs and goals. However, as several
presentations pointed out, the expectations of developing
countries are very different from those of developed nations.
Developing countries clearly expect AIJ to help meet national
development priorities, poverty alleviation, meeting basic
needs and economic development - which, in their view, must
take priority over climate change benefits.
Presentations also
highlighted the need for cost-effective implementation and
private sector participation. They examined several JI/AIJ
programmes and presented country studies from India, Chile,
Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe. Several cases on AIJ projects in
thermal energy, renewable energy, building, road and
transportation, forests, agriculture and land use sector were
outlined. Many included feasibility aspects and design
principles. The final section of the book includes papers on
roles of the different participants in the AIJ regime,
government, private sector and NGOs.
The proceedings
competently capture the many and complex aspects and issues of
AIJ projects and put forward the needs and expectations of
developing countries. It builds on a desire for equitable
partnerships between developing and developed countries so
that the needs of each can be fairly met and identifies ways
to accomplish this.
Available from:
Development
Alternatives
B-32, TARA Crescent,
Qutab Instl. Area, New Delhi - 110016, India
Tel: 91+11+685-1158,
696-7938, 66-5370; Fax: 91+11+686-6031
URL-
http://www.ecouncil.ac.cr/devalt;
Email: tara@sdalt.ernet.in |
Back to Contents
|