BIOMASS FOR BETTER LIVING
-
Forest Based Micro-enterprises
Prema Gera & Madhavi Makkapati
“Ecological forestry” with the
objectives of conservation and sustainable use is the new approach to forest
management. For centuries now people have been collecting Non-Timber Forests
Products (NTEPs) from forests. Value-addition to this biomass, we believe, is
an excellent means of linking conservation with employment. Micro-enterprises
(village/house-hold level) will facilitate this value-addition. These
enterprises while providing sustainable livelihoods to the rural poor will
also lead to prudent utilisation of natural resources.
An FAO study (1987) sums up the advantages of forest based small scale or
micro-enterprises as ‘incredibly diverse’ but having several common
characteristics.
They are :
- |
Small
size and often household based |
- |
Rural
& frequently seasonal |
- |
High
labour and low capital intensive |
- |
Beneficial
to the poor and socially disadvantaged groups and women. |
Two factors which are crucial to the success of any enterprise would be its
environmental and social soundness.
Environmental Soundness
Uncontrolled collections often
endanger regeneration of the NTFP generating species. Whether contractors
hire local people for collecting NTFPs to the Forest Development Corporations
/ Co-operatives, the immediate economic gain combined with non- surety of
tenure or rights on the trees seems to result in over-exploitation.
In the mid 1980s, the government of Uttar Pradesh replaced the contractor
system by grassroots organisations called Bheshaj Sanghs. Members of these
Sanghs were trained in sustainable methods of harvesting NTFPs and issued
licences to collect in areas demarcated by the Forest Department. A study by
Economic Development Associates, New Delhi, has found that licence holders
hired cheap migrant labour (mainly from Nepal) who collected as much as they
could to earn higher wages.
Environmental soundness is clearly dependent more on the stake people have
over the resource, than on rights to collect the products.
Social Viability
The existing system of
collection and value-addition of NTFPs is disadvantageous to local
communities, being confined to the household level with a middleman serving as
the link with the market. Technology is most cases is obsolete, product
development negligible and capital for improving the production process
virtually absent. They are mere wage earners and categorised as ‘unskilled’
labour.
Here again, past experiences provide direction for the future. The wooden
match box industry in India is an excellent example where concerted effort by
the government in the form of protective tariffs and differential excise
duties has favoured the expansion of the small-scale sector (handmade) which
produces about 67% of the total match boxes in the country and employs about
two lakh people.
The progressive policy of the government however has not be able to contain
the ascendancy of 18 families who have virtual monopoly in this sector by
controlling a number of cottage level units through sub-contracts. It has
also been unsuccessful in stalling deliberate fragmentation by bigger units to
take advantage of the incentives offered to smaller units.
A study by FAO (1991) - ‘Women’s Role in Dynamic Forest Based Small Scale
Enterprises’ - has found that women benefit substantially from these
enterprises. It is also true that commercialisation, organised collection,
technology introduction, training and institutional support tend to favour
men.
These learnings will have to be taken into account in determining the social
viability of micro-enterprises. Selection of individual entrepreneurs from
among the ‘rural poor’ is crucial for ensuring benefits to the most needy.
Group enterprises of ‘clusters’ of families linked in a production and
marketing network is another option available for equitable distribution of
benefits.
These insights notwithstanding, Forest Based Enterprises are still poorly
understood. Environmental and social soundness are not doubt important; but
economic viability too is necessary for success. Further research is required
to understand the inter-relationships between all these factors. The
challenge lies in using this understanding to design institutional and other
linkages that are essential for enterprise promotion product development,
production, marketing, credit and financing mechanisms and investment.
Back
to Contents
|