ECOLOGICAL
FORESTRY -
A Government
Initiative
Nina Sengupta & Mahave Makkapati
India’s rich and diverse natural habitats - which include forests, reefs,
wetlands etc. are under immense population pressure. At present more than 40
percent of the population living adjacent to forests depends on them for
livelihood and income. In this context, conservation and management of
forests will not be an easy task. The situation demands new initiatives,
fresh ideas, and efficient implementation.
We interviewed Mr. S.C. Dey,
Additional Inspector General - Wildlife, Ministry of Environment and Forests
to learn about the government’s recent initiatives in the forestry sector.
The need to conserve and optimally utilise our forests has been felt in the
forestry circles. However, a change in this direction needs to be perceived
over a longer time frame. If changes are introduced radically, it is likely
that priorities of the present decade will be discarded in the coming
decades. The forestry sector would then be the worst sufferer because trees
unlike agricultural crops are not annual. Therefore, changes need to be
gradual and well thought out.
India’s forestry scenario has, in fact, not been static all this while; it has
changed tremendously in the last four decades. The post-independence period
has seen changes in approach from commercial to industrial forestry; social
forestry in mid seventies and the present focus on environmental and
ecological forestry. The primary goal is conservation of biodiversity with
benefits accruing to local communities.
The recent Forest Policy (1988) reflects this changed attitude which now needs
to be backed by programmes. The National Forest Action Plan is being prepared
which seeks to earmark different categories of protected areas: those for
purely conservation purposes and those which can be managed as habitatspecies
conservation zones while allowing for certain controlled activities for the
benefit of local communities. Certain areas need to be completely preserved
because the complex and diverse life forms in nature cannot be regenerated
under any managed system.
Forest areas outside protected areas need to be regenerated and managed for
the requirement of the local people and the nation. In 1984, the target was
to plant five million hectares annually but a target of only two million
hectares/year could be achieved. The gap is still large and the population is
increasing rapidly. As a result, even the targetted figure of five mha./yr.
is not adequate to meet future requirements. Therefore, in addition to
planting at least 8-10 mha/yr, there is need for growing more biomass,
switching over to alternative sources of biomass and introduction of
efficient utilisaiton patterns. The process of regeneration can be natural or
artificial as the situation demands. The thrust on indigenous species will
continue.
As far as the issue of sustainability is concerned, people will have to
curtail their dependency on natural habitats to some extent and as
compensation, programmes for ecologically compatible economic activities need
to be initiated.
Ecodevelopment will be the major thrust in all major thrust in all major plans
related to forestry, biodiversity or wildlife. Presently it is being tried
out on an experimental basis. Once a model is established, further investment
would be required to replicate the effort in other areas.
All the above programmes will require substantial investment. India has 22
percent of land recorded under forest, whereas the share of forest development
in the total expenditure plan is only one percent. Mobilising funds from
within the country and outside, therefore, will be an important task for MOEF.
At both national and international fora, agencies support India’s approach
which is viewed as pragmatic and rational. Now that the Biodiversity
Convention has come into force and funds from the Global Environment Facility
(GEF) are available, India can expect higher investment and more action on the
forestry front.
Environment Action Programme
-
A summary
The Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, initiated an
Environment Action Programme in 1993 as a sequel to the National Conservation
Strategy and India’s Policy Statement on Environment and Development. The
focus of this programme is on seven top priority areas. These are :
- |
conservation and sustainable utilisation of biodiversity in selected
eco-systems including forests, coral reefs, mangroves, wetlands and mountain
eco-systems; |
- |
afforestation, wasteland development and conservation of soil & moisture and
ensuring that water sources are not polluted |
- |
control of industrial pollution with emphasis on waste reduction / management; |
- |
improving access to clean technologies; |
- |
tackling urban environmental issues; |
- |
strengthening scientific
understanding of environmental issues, including training and
environmental educations; and |
- |
alternative energy plan |
A
number of reputed non-governmental institutions are participating in the
process, to identify critical issues in the selected areas.
A
realistic strategy has been drawn up for implementing the EAP, taking into
account potential impacts of the on-going economic liberalisation which will
accelerate industrialisation. Some of these impacts would be higher pollution
loads, diversification of natural habitats for other uses, etc. The strategy
is to create the base for drawing up Regional Environmental Impact Assessment
profiles based on carrying capacity. This, coupled with systematic data
collection and natural resource accounting will form the underlying foci of
all the programmes in the seven priority areas. Success of the EAP itself
would be assessed in terms of its success in establishing EIA and Natural
Resource Accounting as basic tools for decision making at various level.
Following an Inter-Ministerial review the EAP in now ready for
implementation. The Implementation Committee will now guide the identified
institutions in execution and monitoring of the programmes. The EAP will be
reviewed in 1996, a year before Eighth Five Year Plan concludes, through
governmental and non-governmental fora, and its outcome is expected to enhance
the internalisation of the EAP in future Five Year Plans.
Back to Contents
|