MISSION MULTIPLIERS
Looking Ahead
George C. Varughese
A garage is not everyone’s idea
of a perfect setting for defining the complex maze of sustainable
development. But, it is indeed a graphic description of the initial days of
Development Alternatives, a decade ago. During the first couple of years a
great deal of our time was spent on pondering over the need for “alternative”
approaches for the country’s development. We were part of the then small, but
growing breed of votaries of sustainable development. The beginning was tough
- many sceptics wrote us off, others were intrigued by our zeal and
motivation, and fewer still saw substance in our vision.
The initial years
There were the initial hiccups
in finding external projects, and the environment group was clearly struggling
for clients and also for sustainable solutions. Early 1986 saw a few
projects materalising - EIA of soapstone mines, rural energy planning,
rehabilitation of bonded labourers, etc. Soon an opportunity for national
policy advise came as a shot in the arm. These assignments generated a
tremendous amount of internal confidence and the staff strength grew to
seven. The projects, however, did not bring in adequate financial security
with the result that longer-term staff and subject area continuity were
debilitated.
Around the same time, the country presented a number of interesting
possibilities- the economy was beginning to be liberalised and a number of
high growth areas got a boost, government was just beginning to listen to NGOs
and the environment movement was slowly gaining momentum. It perhaps provided
a conducive environment for our own growth.
By then we had also moved, from the garage to our own beautiful headquarters
building -- a celebration of earth architecture. This period was clearly a
distinct watershed, bringing in subject area strengths: natural resources
management including community based management systems, and participatory
planning systems at the district and watershed levels. We also gained
expertise in using tools like EIA and GIS for environmental management. This
phase of consolidation helped us deepen and widen professional disciplines in
the group and also provided a fair amount of financial latitude.
About the same time, Development Alternatives played an active role in the
united Nations Conference on Environment And Development (UNCED). The
president of Development Alternatives having been nominated as the Chairperson
of the International Facilitating Committee, the organisation served as his
technical secretariat. This provided us a unique opportunity to strengthen
and consolidate our global networks.
Problems kept chasing us nonetheless: we would fluctuate between phases of
virtual lack of work and spurts of frenzied activities. Institution building,
we were increasingly convinced, was a hard battle. Looking back, we draw
immense satisfaction from our institutional growth curve, the strengths we
derived from our organic growth were immense, as opposed to rigid cut and
dried prescriptions of institutional structures.
Building up
In early 1992, as part of our
evolution we undertook a strategic planning exercise, which among other things
highlighted the need for further decentralisation within the group. The
existing picture (please see the centre spread) consists of focussed thematic
groups and facilitating units and the spirit is one of strength and confidence
in shaping the future environment mandate of our country.
A trans-disciplinary team of approximately 20 professionals spanning the
social, biological, engineering, planning and management sciences have the
capability to address a broad spectrum of environment and development issues.
Some of our basic infrastructure like laboratories, GIS and computer modelling
facilities, information support units and field stations are regularly
enhanced and upgraded.
Each of the thematic groups and facilitating units are in the process of
consolidation and are establishing themselves systematically and consistently
identifying substantive areas of interest based on our relative advantage and
future needs.
The basic needs and environment group has been historically looking into
various issues of natural resource management and rehabilitation of project
affected people. The current thrust is on designing and setting up
environmentally, socially and economically viable micro
enterprises based on
non-timber forest produce. In conjunction with our GIS and modelling
facility, the group is also focussing on evolving decision support systems for
meso and micro level planning and management.
The industry and environment group has graduated from EIAs and is moving into
waste minimisation and pollution prevention strategies and technologies
especially for small and medium enterprises. Concepts and techniques for
audits and life cycle analysis are also being perfected. Our environmental
monitoring laboratory after having developed a low cost water quality testing
kit in collaboration with WWF-India, is working towards improving the kit and
is also developing kits for soil and air.
Our group on living resources conservation is working on natural habitat
assessments and management of protected areas. The global environment group
is focussing on the human dimensions of global change with an attempt to
understand the science, impacts and possible response strategies. We have
developed and conducted environment education and training capsules for school
children and teachers, NGOs, industrial personnel and government officials.
The Government of India has nominated us to the National Environment Council,
while the UNEP awarded us the Global 500 Roll of Honour for environmental
achievement at Rio in 1992. These are just examples of formal recognition in
addition to the tremendous amount of good will already generated with
different institutions and individuals.
Looking Ahead
Our game plan for the future
relies on deriving multipliers from our past and present work. The approach
we intend to adopt would be to work more intensely with like minded
individuals and groups from among government agencies, research institutions,
industry, financing agencies and the NGO community. This is notwithstanding
the importance of strengthening our own capability in addressing issues of
sustainable development. We would continue doing this by enhancing our
field-level operations and research work.
A logical corollary to our current efforts will be a conscious move towards
strengthening our network functions. Developing durable and adaptable working
relationships is a process, but we already have a body of experience which
should guide us in future. Be that as it may, we are fired by the reality
that the problems of this country are gigantic and unless synergies are
derived, we can only have limited impacts and no more.
An important partner that requires specific focus is the vast number of small
organisations spread across the country. The diversity of their approach and
ingenuity in addressing problems of environment and development need to be
reinforced. However, a good majority of them operate at sub-optimal level and
are often hindered by lack of expertise, infrastructure and finances. On the
other hand, they have the requisite credibility with local communities.
Institutions like Development Alternatives could provide these missing links
leading to mutual benefit.
Most specifically, this role will include building up systems where by small
organisations can have better access to:
|
Expertise
- through information and technology packages, training programmes and
competent professionals for short competent professionals for short
consultations. |
|
Infrastructure
- guiding small organisations to larger institutions for assistance in
laboratory, computing and workshop facilities. |
|
Finances
- guiding small organisations to sources of funds, assisting in project
formulation and undertaking disbursement and management of funds. |
To derive these multipliers, we are proceeding carefully and hope to learn the
intricacies as we go along. We are confident that this approach will provide
more meaning to the laboratories, research facilities, satellite imagery
interpretation and other capabilities which we are currently building up.
This link with grassroots organisations would also ensure that our work and
activities are constantly rooted in the ground realities of this country. The
in-house technical competence developed will continue to have a soul and the
chances of our “garage dreams” materialising will hold much more promise.
Back
to Contents
|