| Sushant
  School of Art and ArchitectureCompressed earth
  block construction used to build workshop facility
 
 The Shelter Group
  at Development Alternatives and Tara Nirman Kendra are committed to the use of
  appropriate technology in building construction. Building technologies and
  process must be functional, resource conserving and environmentally sound.
  Earth construction, particularly in the area of compressed earth blocks, has
  been a major programme at Development Alternatives for over seven years. The
  Shelter Group has carried out extensive work on materials research, machine
  development, production and testing of blocks, design and construction of
  buildings, information dissemination, and training of personnel in this field.
 
 The workshop building
  at the Sushant School of Art and Architecture (.S.S.A.A) in Gurgaon, Haryana,
  is our most recent building project. Completed in March 1992, the building was
  designed by a group of third-year architecture students from S.S.A.A., with
  assistance from the Shelter Group.
 
 The 1001-square foot structure is almost entirely built of cement-stabilised,
  compressed earth blocks. The blocks were manufactured on the TARA Balram
  manual press, using local solid from the project site and from a basement
  excavation nearby.
 
 The initial concept of the workshop space to be built as an extension to the
  existing art studio came from the Dean, Mr. Mansinh M. Rana, and was
  translated into sketch form by the students. It was apparent that the students’
  sketches were inspired by the architecture of Hasan Fathy (the esteemed
  Egyptian architect and father of modern earth architecture). These were
  moulded into final design under the guidance of Shrashtant Patara and Zeenat
  Niazi (architects form Development Alternatives) and Mr. Rana, who emphasised
  the contemporary nature of the building and its role as a representative of
  modern earth architecture.
 
 An important factor in the design was the site itself. The building had to fit
  into a grove of eucalyptus trees, resulting in its ‘L’ shape. A young neem
  tree which came within the boundaries was made a part of the semi-open
  verandah space and allowed to grow through an aperture in the stone roof.
 
 To ensure efficient construction management, it was agreed that the central
  responsibility would lie with one single agency. As a regular practitioner of
  this technology, Tara Nirman Kendra was appointed as the building agency. The
  students were invited to participate in the construction as much as possible.
 
 The roof was point of major debate. According to one viewpoint, a curved roof
  form (a natural outcome - since earth is best used in compression structures)
  would not harmonise with the surrounding structures which have sloping
  asbestos sheet roofs. The computer argument was that a different material and
  a different technology should be treated as such, and need not necessarily
  conform to its surrounding. An aesthetic balance must be achieved, however.
 
    
    
      
        | For
          the School of Architecture, it was also important to have various
          building types and styles. The debate finally ended in favour of a
          curved roof of compressed earth blocks, with the learning value to the
          students the deciding factor. | It is
          important to expose students of architecture and engineering to
          alternative building materials and technologies |  The inner
  space, determined largely by the site clearance and the most economical clear
  spans possible, is divided into three parts. The two arms of the ‘L’ are
  covered by jack-arches built with compressed earth blocks on composite steel
  and RC (reinforcement concrete) beams. The central junction is roofed by a
  dome 4.02 metres in diameter and 11.5 cm thick. also built with compressed
  earth blocks.
 During construction, the three work areas evolved as a single, uninterrupted
  space - as all inner walls were removed and only essential structural supports
  were left as basic dividers of space. This enhanced the feeling of openness in
  the otherwise small space. One brick thick (9 inches or 23 cm) walls and
  columns now enclose the workshop which will be used for clay modelling,
  sculpture and wood-working.
 
 The local soil available had a very high percentage of fine sand and was low
  in clay content. Therefore the soil was stabilised with 5 percent cement and
  25 percent coarse sand to achieve the required standard of strength in the
  blocks. As the resultant block were found to be highly resistant to water
  penetration, we decided to leave them exposed to the elements on the external
  surface. Internally, the building has been plastered with a traditional
  Rajasthani plaster of lime, sand and surkhi (brick dust).
 
    
    
      
        | Traditional
          methods and modern technology were employed in the construction of the
          building |  The
  external cover of the jack-arches was adapted from the traditional terracing
  practices of rural Rajasthan and Haryana. Small pieces of broken brickbats
  were embedded in a layer of lime-sand-surkhi mix that was applied over the
  jack-arch roof. Over this, another layer of the same mix, combined with
  stone-grit, fenugreek (maithi seed) and mollases, was applied and the external
  face of the jack-arch roof was beaten to firmness. This rather laborious
  process eliminated the use of cement concrete in terracing for jack-arches.
  For the dome, the external treatment consisted of a soil-based,
  cement-stabilised plaster rubbed smooth to a water-resistant finish.
 This project provided an excellent opportunity for the Shelter Group to
  closely monitor the process of site and construction management. The tight
  controls and records maintained at the site enabled the project team to
  compile realistic costs per unit rates of each item of construction. The
  building took 85 days to complete and was finished only one day behind
  schedule, at a cost of Rs. 1.42,000 or Rs. 141.85 per square foot.
 
 Even if more money were to be sent on upgrading finishes, the S.S.A.A.
  building demonstrates that it is feasible to build and environmentally-sound
  alternatives at considerably less than the normal cost.
 
 For the Shelter Group, this project is one more step in our journey toward
  widespread development and dissemination of technologies for improved earth
  construction.
 
 
 by Zeenat Niazi
  
   Back
  to Contents
    
  
      
     |