Green
Enterprises for Green Homes
A lmost
25 per cent of the population in the India lacks adequa te housing. The
urban housing deficit estimates stand at 23 million units and the rural
deficit is over 40 million units. The construction of these units is an
energy and resource intensive process. Construction accounts for 22 per
cent of the national greenhouse gas emissions. A major share of the
burden is borne by the building materials alone. Cement, steel and
bricks are the largest and bulk consumption items in the Indian
construction industry.1
These are also the most energy guzzling.
The Challenges
With the exponential growth in
population, these numbers are only set to rise. Post-disaster
reconstruction due to the increased frequency and intensity of extreme
weather events as a consequence of climate change will also add to these
numbers. In addition, the migration trends towards urban centres will
skew the balance, creating a much larger urban housing deficit. About
two-thirds of the world’s population will be located in urban areas by
2050, creating serious implications for the conservation of natural
resources, according to the 2012 edition of the Nature’s Living Planet
Report.
However, a majority of this
construction will occur at the so-called bottom of the pyramid. So,
while the construction industry is booming, it is traditionally not
positioned to cater to this immense demand. Particularly in rural areas
and small and medium towns, where the majority of the current demand is
housed, people either construct their own houses or take the assistance
of individual contractors.
Owning your own house is every
person’s aspiration. The primary reason for this large deficit in
housing stock is affordability. The 60 million families who do not own
their own houses or live in temporary structures do so because they
cannot afford to buy their own homes. Buying a house is a once in a life
time investment. While urban spaces are flooded with home loan offers,
these debt options are not available to rural and urban-informal
populations. Lack of adequate credit history and worthiness and required
paperwork act as major barriers in accessing the formal credit streams.
There is also a lack of
affordable options for appropriate techno-logies. Appropriate technology
options do exist, but evidence of their spontaneous adoption is lacking.
This is due to a multitude of reasons ranging from inadequate
information regarding options and lack of consumer demand at the buyer’s
end to inadequate incentives for entrepreneurs and lack of favourable
market and non-market conditions at the supply end. Cumbersome
regulatory procedures act as further barriers.
However, there have been
instances of successful models that integrate the demand of housing with
green enterprises. A green enterprise is one that combines profitability
with environmental and social benefits to its workers and the society at
large. This approach dovetails the issues of lack of housing as well as
livelihood opportunities to provide a sustainable delivery model for
houses and building materials. As green enterprises, they take into
account environmental concerns such as energy efficiency, waste
utilisation, resource efficiency, etc.
Energy Efficient Bricks
The most commonly used building
material is the red brick, primarily a product of an unorganised and
informal sector. However, in order to fuel the construction boom, the
sector directly employs 8 million people each season to produce over 170
million bricks in 150,000 units. Every year they use 350 million tonnes
of fertile top soil and 24 million tonnes of coal, emitting 42 million
tonnes CO 2.
It is the single largest source of air pollution and also exerts a high
pressure on natural resources like soil and coal. In addition to the
environmental impact, there are serious social implications such as
unsanitary and hazardous working conditions of the labourers. Rising
energy prices, competing uses for limited resources, labour shortages
and poor working conditions in the face of increasing demand are some of
the ‘treats’ faced by the sector.
Resource and energy efficient
technologies like the Vertical Shaft Brick Kilns (VSBK) are certainly
available. This is a small-scale enterprise that can be set up with a
capital investment of as little as INR 25 lakhs. With a capacity of
8000-10,000 uniform bricks per day, the kiln offers a saving of over 30
per cent on fuel costs and emissions, establishing it as a green
enterprise. There are about 150 such enterprises in different parts of
the India today.
The potential for setting up
enterprises is vast. To cite an example, just one Indian state, say,
Bihar needs over 7500 million bricks over the next five years just to
meet the rural housing gap of 1.1 million dwellings per year. Potential
savings of 2.8 million tonnes of CO 2
are possible while creating livelihoods for 0.35 million people by
introducing cleaner production systems.
|
TARA Machines and Tech Services (TMTS)
TARA Machines and Tech Services (TMTS) is a green
enterprise that markets innovative green building solutions for micro,
small and medium enterprises. Their vision is high quality, affordable,
green building materials to meet the aspirations of millions of
under-serviced home builders.
TMTS was set up to meet the acute shortage of
building materials in rural areas and small towns in the face of a
growing market. The absence of credible business solutions for micro and
small scale manufacturers to meet the yet unfulfilled demand was the
driving force behind this enterprise.
TMTS offers solutions for fly ash technologies, eco-kiln
technologies, eco-concrete technologies and recycling technologies. They
help set up green enterprises across the country which further
contribute to the local economy in an environmentally and socially
responsible manner.
|
Waste Utilisation
India produces around 175
million tonnes of ash annually from the generation of thermal power.
With power production also slated to double by 2020, the amount of waste
produced will be enormous. With lack of adequate disposal facilities,
this magnitude of waste is going to be a national hazard with alarming
consequences.
In India, brick production is
slated to double by 2020. In a business as usual scenario, this will
mean a burden of 34 million tonnes of coal, emitting 300 million tonnes
of CO2
every year – a significant contributor to climate change. It is
estimated that around 750,000 hectares of agricultural land will be lost
each year2.
Utilisation of industrial
wastes like fly ash in brick making overcomes the serious problem of
over exploitation of natural resources such as soil and coal used in red
brick clay firing.
A single fly ash green
enterprise can be set up for a capital investment on INR 15 lakhs while
employing 15 unskilled workers. Apart from solving the twin issues of
demand for building materials and safe disposal of industrial wastes,
the enterprise has the potential to complement the country’s target of
25 per cent emission reduction by 2020.
Odisha is poised to be a major
hub for manufacturing industries, which will lead to the generation of
enormous quantities of industrial wastes. The use of industrial wastes
like fly ash, dolochar, etc., in brick production can potentially save
over 4.6 million tonnes of CO 2
per year. Setting up 800 new units just to utilise the available fly ash
will lead to the generation of over 15000 jobs for local people.
Other products as Micro
Concrete Roofing (MCR) Tiles can be taken up as micro enterprises with
investments to the tune of INR 2-4 lakhs. MCR tiles are used as a
cladding material for construction of sloping roofs. The MCR tiles edge
above the conventional roof cladding material due to their structural
strength and durability, cost effectiveness, lowest embodied energy –
among other alternatives – and micro-scale entrepreneurial
possibilities.
Green Construction
Apart from green enterprises
for manufacture of appropriate building materials, green enterprises
also exist that offer construction services.
The Development Alternatives
Group has facilitated the grouping of artisans into common interest
groups under the TARA Karigar Mandal (TKM), to upgrade them from being
just masons to contractors and go on to manage their own work. At
present, there are more than 150 masons associated with TKM for
undertaking construction projects of rural infrastructure. As a green
enterprise, TKM provides eco-construction services to build houses and
public buildings while enhancing the profitability of the masons due to
skill upgradation.
TARA Karigar Mandal will be
registered as a Mutually Aided Cooperative Society with the Madhya
Pradesh Government. TKM has been organising training programmes for new
masons, and capacity building of trained masons for transition towards
becoming supervisors. Group management trainings were also organised for
TKM. TKM has also successfully bid for both private and government
construction projects. TKM masons are trained in eco construction
technologies and go on to provide service for housing and public
building construction in Bundelkhand. The various construction material
and methods which are being promoted by the TKM include roofing options
like arch roof panel, funicular and plank and joist roof and walling
options such as rat trap bond and compressed earth block masonry.
The Mahila Housing SEWA Trust (MHT)
was established by the Self Employed Women Association (SEWA) in 1994
with the overall objective of improving the housing and infrastructure
conditions of the underprivileged women in the informal sector. MHT is
involved in post-disaster reconstruction activities as well as building
pucca homes and toilets for the rural population in collaboration
with the State Government of Gujarat. They also help link their clients
with financial institutes in order to access microfinance credit streams
as well as government schemes and subsidies.
TARA Nirman Kendras (TNK) is
another social enterprise promoted by the Development Alternatives (DA)
Group with a mandate to provide affordable green habitat solutions
through the delivery of eco materials that have low-embodied energy, and
utilise industrial waste, and affordable advisory support in order to
create ecological and affordable built environments. TNK is committed to
the creation of employment in the building materials and construction
sector through skill enhancement of building artisans.
Conclusion
Small and micro enterprises
that produce eco materials and provide eco construction services need to
be supported. These enterprises have a sound basis of good science,
economic realism and political acceptability.
While a few of these
enterprises have arisen spontaneously, the government needs to step in
to promote them for improved all round progress of the artisans as well
as their products. Fiscal facilitation by way of tax exemptions for
eco-material production and supply must be provided. While the
enterprise development may be in the purview of the National Rural
Livelihoods Mission, the products and services must be linked to all
public programmes that lead to creation of rural housing, habitat
infrastructure and public buildings, including Indira Awaas Yojna and
public buildings in villages, district and block towns so as to promote
their market. The popularisation of the eco materials must, therefore,
be built into the awareness and communication budgets and terms of
reference within the scope of the IAY / rural habitat programme.
The government had pioneered
the concept of building centres or Nirmitee Kendras and Nirman Kendras
as institutions at the district level to promote locally relevant eco
materials. Though many of these are currently defunct, those that are
operational and successful indicate that being market oriented,
responsive to local needs and possessing robust management practices
ensure their success. These centres can be redefined as entrepreneurial
building centres encouraging small and medium enterprise to adopt these
technologies.
q
Kriti Nagrath
knagrath@devalt.org
Endnotes
1 Reddy, Venkatarama B.V. and Jagadish, K.S. (2003) ‘Embodied energy of
common and alternative building materials and technologies’. In:
Energy and Buildings, 35 (2). pp. 129-137
2 Exploitative depth of 2 feet
Back to Contents
|
|