The
Construction Sector in India and Climate Change
The
construction sector in India emits about 22% of the total annual
emission of CO2 resulting from the Indian economy. Of the emissions
from the construction sector, 80% are resulting mainly from the
products/industrial processes of four energy intensive building
materials:
* Steel
* Cement
* Bricks
* Lime
For
each of the four building materials, there exists a technology
spread characterised by widely varying levels of energy and material
consumption within each sector. The total energy and emissions for
1989-90 for these four building materials are 742.5 peta joules and
80.5 million tones of CO2. The energy and emission levels were
arrived at as a function of technology and scale of production
(Table 1).
A
study conducted by Development Alternatives discussed the increasing
demand for building materials in the construction sector as a direct
outcome of the galloping demand for housing on a continuing growth
trend of 2.4% per annum aggregate cumulative growth rate. The
housing gap which is currently 30.8 million houses will be steadily
cleared by the year 2011 AD. Housing will finally be provided to
the entire population estimated to be 1308 million according to the
low growth scenario in 2020 AD.
The
nature of building materials used in housing has been taken to be
75% of the permanent type as per trends upto 1991. Beyond 2001, the
growth rate has been revised downwards to conform to the population
growth rate. The housing gap is likely to be closed by 2011 if the
projected trend persists.
The
summary of the total energy and emissions for the four materials
derived through the Developmen Alternatives study has been presented
in Table 2.
The
energy and emissions upto 2020 have been computed using specific
energy consumption and carbon emission factor. Although steel and
cement together constitute more than two-thirds of the net
contribution, these are sectors that are showing positive signs of
adopting energy efficiency measures.
Future Scenario
At
Table 3 on Page 4, energy consumption per tonne of material (1000
bricks in case of bricks) and the emission for different levels of
technologies, viz, business-as-usual, best practice and new
technologies show the mitigating impact that best practice and new
technologies can make on the climate change causative factors.
Going by `business-as-usual`, the energy need for 2020 AD works out
to 2363 PJ for the construction sector. If the `best practice’
route is followed, a 17% reduction is possible and if new
technologies are adopted, a reduction of 25% in energy consumption
is achievable.
Table 1: Total energy and emissions for cement,
steel, brick and lime (1989-90) |
Material |
Production |
Energy
PJ |
CO2 Emissions (106)
tCO2
tC |
Cement |
47.53 x 106t |
275.0 |
43.7 |
11.92 |
Steel |
08.09 x 106t |
256.0 |
19.3 |
5.26 |
Bricks |
45.31 x 109 nos. |
190.0 |
13.3 |
3.63 |
Lime |
03.30 x 106t |
21.5 |
4.2 |
1.15 |
Table 2: Projections upto 2000
Material Demand, Energy and
Emission |
|
Material
Quantity |
Energy PJ |
Emission
mt CO2 |
Year |
2000 |
2010 |
2020 |
2000 |
2010 |
2020 |
2000 |
2010 |
2020 |
Steel (in mt) |
9.6 |
14.9 |
23.0 |
303.4 |
469.9 |
726.8 |
23.0 |
35.0 |
55.2 |
Cement (in mt) |
92.5 |
136.0 |
202.0 |
535.8 |
787.7 |
1173.1 |
85.1 |
125.2 |
186.2 |
Bricks (in billion) |
61.2 |
72.9 |
89.1 |
257.0 |
306.2 |
374.2 |
17.7 |
21.1 |
25.8 |
Lime (in mt) |
5.1 |
8.3 |
13.6 |
33.3 |
51.2 |
88.4 |
6.7 |
10.8 |
17.7 |
Total
Energy & Emission |
2262.5 |
284.9 |
Table 3 : Different Levels of Technology
|
Technology as usual |
Best Practice |
New Technology |
|
Steel
Production |
Description |
Mini : Scrap based |
Mini: Mixed feed 75%
scrap, 30% sponge, non-cooking coal based |
Mini: Mixed feed,
70% scrap, 30% sponge iron, natural gas based |
|
ISP : Open Hearth,
LD Concast |
ISP : thin slab
continuous casting, coal injection |
ISP : Corex process,
utilising non-coking coal |
Energy* |
31.6 GJ/t |
24.75 GJ/t |
21.7 GJ/t |
Emissions |
2.4 t CO2/t |
1.82 t CO2/t |
1.2 t CO2/t |
* Energy figure is
based on possible mix of technologies for different scales of
production. |
|
|
|
|
|
Cement
Production |
Description |
Dry process = 75%
Semi dry = retrofitting wet
Wet process being phased out |
Gujarat Ambuja; Dry
process with 5 stage pre-heater |
Improved dry process
at Japanese levels of technology |
Energy* |
5.79 GJ/t |
5.34 GJ/t |
4.5 GJ/t |
Emissions |
0.92 t CO2/t |
0.894 t CO2/t |
0.835 t CO2/t |
* Energy figure is
based on possible mix of technologies for different scales of
production. |
|
|
|
|
|
Brick
Production |
Description |
Bull's Trench Kiln
with Movable Chimney : 90% Fixed Chimney: 10% |
Bull's Trench Kiln
with Fixed Chimney |
High Drought Kiln
and Vertical Shaft Brik Kiln |
Energy * |
4.2 GJ/'000 bricks |
3.2 GJ/'000 bricks |
2.6 GJ/'000 bricks |
Emissions |
0.29 t CO2/'000
bricks |
0.23 t CO2/'000
bricks |
0.18 t CO2/'000
bricks |
* Energy figure is
based on possible mix of technologies for different scales of
production. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lime
Production |
Description |
Kiln : Traditional
VSK for building lime with Movable Chimney : 90% Fixed Chimney:
10% |
Kiln : Improved VSK
KVIC, CBRI design exists for Chemical Lime |
Kiln : Parallel flow
regenerate type |
Energy * |
6.5 GJ/tonne |
5.5 GJ/tonne |
4.6 GJ/tonne |
Emissions |
1.3 t CO2/t |
1.03 t CO2/t |
0.97 t CO2/t |
* Energy figure is
based on possible mix of technologies for different scales of
production. |
Shelter is a basic need and is high on India’s national priority.
The Construction Sector stands out as one of the areas for
North/South collaboration at the industry level in the interest of
abatement of global warming.
Source : "Case Study for Construction in
India" - by Development Alternatives in "Structural Transformation
Process towards Sustainable Development in India and Switzerland" -
published by INFRAS publication, Zurich. q
Back to Contents
|