Credit
to Weaker Sections
Establishing Linkages Between Self-help Groups & Banks for Development
and Expansion of Choice
In
the modern world of competition and globalization, the policies
concerning rural credit are, by and large, based on certain assumptions.
These include the reluctance of commercial banks to provide credit to
the rural poor, inability of the poor to save; requirement of credit by
the poor at concessionary rates of interest and their limited success in
income generating activities. Based on these assumptions, the policy
makers set up credit oriented development banks and developed special
credit programmes and generous credit guarantee schemes that would
induce banks to enlarge their lending operations, achieve targets of
credit dispensation or loans to be disbursed to rural borrowers at
subsidized interest rates and easy terms of lending (like very low or
nil down payment, long maturity period, long grace period and relegation
of savings as a source of funds). This was envisaged to increase
reliance on the rural credit system and to gradually replace the
non-formal banking intermediaries, dominant in rural India.
Despite the policies made with the best of intentions it is well known
that rural credit system is poor in its discipline. This is because
subsidies and concessions involved in rural credit are more often
availed by the not so poor while a majority of the very poor are unable
to benefit from the systems prevailing. Further, the rural credit
delivery system in most regions, is weakened by poor credit discipline
among the borrowers resulting in low recovery of dues, high operating
(intermediation) costs, burden of subsidized interest rates,
non-viability of operations and heavy dependence on concessionary
outside funding or refinance support. These holistically constrain
development of self-sustaining systems. Such problems were overcome by
mediating through formation of community institutions and have yielded
phenomenal results as captured in this article.
Means of
Resolve
The core problem of rural finance is high transaction costs to the banks
in financing a large number of small borrowers who require credit
frequently and in small quantities. The same holds true of costs
involved in providing saving facilities to small, scattered savers in
rural areas. On the other side of the coin, the rural savers and
borrowers also face high transaction costs while dealing with banks due
to distances, small value of financial transactions and so on. Besides
high transaction costs, another major constraint which restricts the
outreach of the formal banking system for the poor, is perception of
risks in financing small borrowers who are unable to offer physical
collateral, articulate their case or submit proper loan proposals, do
not have urban orientation and the lack of flexibility in their
operations. As against credit from formal finance institutions which are
subject to several ifs and buts, credit in the informal system is
usually available immediately, whenever and where ever required, often
without any collateral and without lengthy documentation formalities.
This is because in case of the latter, the lender usually relies on
personal knowledge about borrowers and their circumstances. Recognizing
the limitations of formal finance institutions as well as that of
individual borrowers of rural India, a third mechanism which bridges the
gap was found. This was to lend to a group and not to an individual.
Hence to cater to the credit needs of the rural poor for meeting their
social and economic aspirations, formation of Self Help Groups (SHGs)
were encouraged. The state governments also viewed these groups as
agencies of development in rural India.
Self
Help Groups
Self-Help Groups (SHGs) or Thrift and Credit Groups are mostly informal
groups whose members pool savings and thereafter
lend out the same within the group on rotational or on need basis. These
groups have a common perception of need and impulse towards collective
action. Many of these groups get formed around specific production
activity. They promote savings among members and use the pooled
resources to meet emergent needs of members, including consumption
needs. Involvement of SHGs with banks helps in overcoming the problem of
high transaction costs in providing credit to the poor, by passing on
some banking responsibilities regarding loan appraisal, follow-up and
recovery on the poor themselves. In addition, the distinctive character
of SHGs and the relations of the members offer ways of overcoming
problems related to collateral, excessive documentation and physical
access which usually limit the capacity of formal institutions of
serving the poor.
Financial Institutions and SHGs:
The linkages of SHGs with banks aim at intermediation. It cuts down
transaction costs for both banks and their rural clients. The objective
of the linkage programme is meant to evolve supplementary credit
strategies for meeting the credit needs of the poor by combining the
flexibility, sensitivity and responsiveness of the informal credit
system with the technical expertise, administrative capability and
financial resources of formal financial institutions. By this process
the poor people and financial institutions build mutual trust and
confidence for supporting livelihoods and enhancing banking habits.
Case
Study
The Potters of Niwari
Development Alternatives today takes pride in calling itself a veteran
in formation and nurturing of Self Help Groups and
facilitating not only finance but a wide variety of choices before them
in the form of livelihood opportunities, natural resource management and
so on. The sailing however, is not as smooth as it may seem. Learning
from the experiences of the first Self Help Group formed by Development
Alternatives in Niwari, one can gauge the dynamics involved in
facilitating finance and increasing choices.
The Prajapati Samuh was formed in 2001 when the strength of SHGs
was not as widely recognized in the area as it is today. A group of 10
ladies all belonging to the Below Poverty Line category were somehow
enthused by the lecture delivered to them by Suresh Ahirwar, an
experienced field worker of the organization. Listening to the financial
advantages that were likely to accrue after formation of SHG, this group
decided to create such a group. Immediately each contributed Rs 100 and
in no time the group had a bank account opened in their name with a
savings of mere 1000 rupees. This process continued for quite a while.
According to the norms of the Bank, an SHG can avail cash credit up to
four times of its savings which implied that after 6 months the group
with a savings of Rs 6000 could withdraw money up to Rs 24,000 without
any collateral. The Prajapati group members were however bears
rather than bulls. Hence they preferred inter-loaning over borrowing
from the Bank. Formation of SHG enabled these potters to withdraw money
from their own kitty whenever the need was felt. Some borrowed to expand
their business, some to get their children married off and some to
relieve themselves of the debts pending with the moneylender.
Formation of SHG indeed meant more to the group than inter-loaning and
easy availability of finance. The enthusiastic lot learnt more about
their traditional art by virtue of uniting into a SHG. This happened
when the Ambedkar Hast Shilp Yojana approached Development
Alternatives with the proposal that they could finance skill upgradation
training of crafts to community institutions that exist. Taking
advantage of this opportunity, the organization proposed the name of the
potters group. The potters of Niwari thus received intensive training
on diversification of products for a six month long period from the
famous Chhote Lal of Chhatarpur who creates wonder models of clay for
the international tourists visiting Khajuraho. This training not only
widened the knowledge of products and craftsmanship of the potters but
opened new avenues of sale for them. It also enabled them to muster the
courage to produce articles different from the run of the mill matka
and to carry them to the craft fair in Bhopal. Earnings increased and so
did group dynamics. Usha Khatik, the president of the group became the
president of the Dastkar Manch, which raised her status within her
group. Expansion of activities and increase in earnings had the group
borrow Rs 65,000 from the bank but the “risk averse” homemakers soon
repaid back the credit taken.
Formation of SHG gave more exposure to the group. They got a chance to
use the electric potters wheel, make holi colours and earn Rs 1200 each.
They also became the backend suppliers of diyas to a candle making group
during Diwali in 2004.
Financing Principles
Financial schemes under the Linkage Programme are based on the following
broad principles:
Savings
first. No credit without saving
Saving
as partial collateral
Bank
lends to the group who in turn lend to members
Credit
decisions for lending to members be taken by the group
Interest
rates and other terms and conditions for loans to members are decided
by group
Joint
liability serves as a substitute for physical collateral
Ratio
between savings and credit is contingent upon credit worthiness of the
group
Credit
limit of the group increases with its good repayment record
Opportunity was thus knocking at their doors in myriad forms. This
increased their income and broadened their mindset. It also brought in
sly thoughts to a few. This led to the emergence of differences within
the group. The controversies were dormant for a long while until one
day six members of the group went up to the Manager of State Bank of
India in Niwari and complained of financial anomalies being practiced by
the president which led to the group being dissolved. But that was not
the end of the story. Nine members of the group excluded Usha and
promptly included a tenth member to form a SHG once again. This they
named the Prajapati Mahila Samuh.
When, an intern studying the significance of forming SHGs went
to interview the group on why they formed a SHG a second time, their
reply was firm “a toddler doesn’t stop walking if he falls once”. The
group which resolved the previous dispute judiciously by evenly
distributing the savings of Rs 75,000 they had accumulated now has a
nascent account with savings of Rs 11,400. They are more cautious now
with regard to inter-loaning and group dynamics but nevertheless are
determined to remain as a group for they know an SHG is not only about
financial help it is about expansion of choices in life.
q
Dr.
S.N. Pandey
snpandey@devalt.org
and
Sudeshna Chatterjee
schatterjee@devalt.org
Back to Contents
|