Explaining DEAN’s objectives at the public
hearing held on the second day of the DEAN Mela, Dr Ashok Khosla,
President of Development Alternatives, said it was "the first major
show of child power.... After almost two years of working with
children we have come to the conclusion that this child power is
perhaps the only way to a better future for our country." The
greatest challenge before DEAN, said Dr Khosla, would be to bring
within its ambit the lakhs, if not millions, of underprivileged
children who do not have access to good education.
The first speaker at the public hearing was Neha
Joshi of DL DAV School, Pitampura. Her subject was solid waste
management. Quoting a survey carried out by the World Health
Organisation, she said that 50 lakh people died every year due to
diseases related to improper disposal of waste. Outlining some of
the other hazards of solid waste, she said that the toxins of the
garbage permeated into water through the ground and then returned to
homes through bore wells. The disposal of plastic, one of the most
hazardous components of solid waste, posed a major problem because
it was non-biodegradable. Joshi had a solution to offer — generating
greater public awareness through the media and the division of
garbage into biodegradable and non-biodegradable components.
This was followed by a presentation on the
greening of Delhi. The speaker was Lalita Lal from Salwan Public
School. Pointing to the dangers of lopsided development priorities,
Lal described Delhi as "an urban settlement ranging between a
comparatively green spacious south and central parts to slums and
badly planned localities." We needed to take a cue from the West
which had learned the hard way that economic development cannot be
the cost of the environment. The need of the hour was to strike a
balance between the country’s economic priorities and ecological
imperatives.
Water purification was the theme of Abhilasha
Dalal, a student of Army Public School. Dalal painted a dismal
picture of the country’s 13 major river systems which have played an
important role in our culture. A dramatic case in point was the
Yamuna which had virtually no water left, even as urban and
industrial wastes made their way into it. Her solution to water
pollution which she described as the "Yamdoot of the 21st century"
was multi-pronged — collective action by the central and state
governments, public and NGOs, relocation of heavy polluting
industries away from these rivers, sewage treatment, tapping water
resources upstream, constant and adequate release of water into the
main rivers throughout the year and , lastly, immediate and
effective population control.
An environmental problem of relatively recent
origin — noise pollution — was then taken up by Priya Raghavan of
Carmel Convent. Noise at the uppermost level of over 150 decibels
could cause traumatic hearing loss and physiological damage inside
the ear even with a single short term blast. Noise could also cause
anxiety and stress. Among the suggestions she forwarded to control
this menace were using quieter machines, lubrication, use of
insulating materials, accoustic zoning and an end to the setting up
of industries in dwelling areas.
The public hearing was notable for the
interaction between the commissioners—key personalities in
government and social agencies— and the children. The first four
presentations were followed by a general discussion where the
commissioners and the public got a chance to air their views on the
environmental issues that were being debated. The first speaker in
the discussion was Kamla Choudhury, chairperson of the Vikram
Sarabhai Foundation and former chairperson of the National Wasteland
Development Board. Her poser to the children: What was the first
step they would take for solid waste management, noise pollution,
air pollution and water pollution? The children were unanimous that
only hands on measures would help. Said Neha Joshi: "I can start the
process of solid waste management by picking up and throwing any
item of garbage." Priya Raghavan had her own suggestion about noise
pollution. "I would start from home by asking my friends not to make
any noise."
Other points were also raised by the
commissioners. Dr RC Trivedi of the Central Pollution Control Board,
commenting on Abhilasha Dalal’s statement on the destruction of the
self purifying quality of rivers, said that if there was no fresh
water in our water bodies there was no question of self
purification. He also said that students had a major role to play in
creating mass awareness about environmental issues. The
controversial issue of the environmental impact of dams was brought
to the fore by RK Khanna, director, environmental management, of the
Central Water Commission. Khanna had a word of reassurance for the
numerous sceptics of dams by pointing out that the government had an
environmental monitoring committee of which he was member secretary.
The agenda of the committee was to monitor construction of dams,
minimise environmental degradation and maximise the benefits. Hydro
power generation, said Khanna, made a non-consumptive use of water
and did not reduce water flow.
The subjects that came up for discussion in the
second round were air quality management (by Umang Sharan of Ramjas
Public School), water conservation — (Anshu Peri of Naval Public
School) and energy conservation (Aditi Zutshi of Delhi Public
School, RK Puram). All three had concrete suggestions to ameliorate
these environmental problems. Sharan was of the opinion that the
government had a major role to play in controlling air pollution by
encouraging car pooling, the introduction of an efficient public
transport system, taking steps to improve fuel quality and
introducing electrostatic precipitators and air pollution detectors.
Peri felt that proper water management systems were needed. A step
in the right direction was the revival of old water harvesting
structures. Zutshi’s presentation focused on the under utilisation
of renewable energy sources in India. Said Zutshi in a hard hitting
speech; " Why are the government’s efforts so lethargic when it
comes to research into and production of non-conventional energy
resources? India receives renewable energy equivalent to over 5,000
trillion kw per hour—more than the total energy consumption of the
country."
The last three speakers were Hemant Merhotra of
Bal Bhavan Public School, Zeeshan Ahmed of DPS Noida and Ravinder
Singh of Kendriya Vidyalaya No 1, Delhi Cantonment, who spoke on the
greening of Delhi, plastic recycling and environmental sanitation
respectively. Pointing out the decline in the green cover of Delhi,
Merhotra said that each of us should take a pledge to plant as many
saplings as possible, protect existing trees and create greater
public awareness about the importance of greenery. This was followed
by a presentation by Ahmed who spoke about the dangers of
indiscriminate use of plastics. Ahmed had several suggestions to
offer— research should be carried out to develop biodegradable
plastics, existing plastic bags should be replaced by biodegradable
ones, illegal plastic recycling units should be shut down and
developed countries should not be allowed to dump plastics in India.
The major question, however, was of the political will to solve the
problem. "Will the government take the necessary steps or are we
waiting for the Supreme Court to pass yet another judgment?"
questioned Ahmed.
The last presentation was made by Singh.
Forwarding some hard statistics, Singh said that on an average a
person in Delhi created about 300 grams of waste a day, while the
city produced 4, 000 tonnes of waste daily. Sanitation then became a
monumental problem because the municipal corporation did not have
adequate infrastructure to handle waste disposal. Delhi, he said,
should take a cue from Surat which had reported a sharp decline in
cases of enteric fever, malaria and pneumonia. Surat had shown how
better sanitary conditions and an incremental increase in allocation
of funds for public health could bring down health costs
dramatically.
After the 10 presentations, the floor was thrown
open to the commissioners and the public. A valuable suggestion came
from Kamla Choudhury who said that DEAN’s reach could be extended to
many other schools if each of the DEAN participants held their own
public hearing with support from Development Alternatives. She also
said that the government had not been able to do much in 50 years
and it was, therefore, the responsibility of civil society—schools,
teachers and NGOs—to pressurise the government into action on
environmental issues.
RK Goel, conservator of forests, and member
secretary of the Delhi Pollution Control Committee, talked next
about the measures the government was taking to increase the green
cover of Delhi. Goel was followed by DK Biswas, chairperson of the
Central Pollution Control Board who asked the school children to
take a pledge to take 50 community centred steps towards environment
protection—saying no to plastic bags, using fountain pens instead of
the less eco friendly disposable pens and refills, among others.
Though the public hearing was just a small step
towards building a more liveable capital, the ball has clearly been
set rolling. And if the enthusiasm of the children who participated
in the DEAN Mela is any indication, they may well be the real agents
of change in the future.