he
Rights Based Approach (HRBA/RBA) to development can be understood as one
that is based on human rights standards and focuses on protecting and
promoting human rights in the process of development. This approach
supports mechanisms that ensure that entitlements and rights are both
attained as well as safeguarded.
The HRBA surfaced in the international development
discourse in 1997, when the Secretary General of the United Nations
called upon the need to mainstream human rights within its aegis. In
2003, a ‘Common Understanding’ of a human rights-based approach was
conceptualised. Dr Amartya Sen’s work on ‘Development as a Freedom’
provides the framework of linking human rights with development. The
UNDP applied Dr Sen’s work to link rights and development, which has a
direct bearing on the rights-based approach of development (Kapoor
2007).
Prior to 1997, development efforts pursued a basic
needs approach that identified the needs of the beneficiaries and
supported as well as advocated for service delivery improvements. The
rights based approach, on the other hand, fulfils the rights of the
people (Boesen and Martin 2007). The difference between the two is that
a ‘need’ that is not fulfilled leads to dissatisfaction, but a
‘right’ that is not fulfilled leads to a violation and its
redressal can be legally and legitimately claimed.
Understanding the approach
The RBA aims to achieve a positive transformation
of power relations among the key stakeholders—the rights holders, or the
group that is unable to experience its full rights—and the duty bearers,
or the institutions who are obligated to fulfill the rights of the
rights holders. It works towards strengthening the capacities of the
rights holders to claim their rights and the duty bearers to respect,
fulfill and protect the rights and meet their obligations. (UNFPA)
The RBA is unique as it acknowledges the fact that
poverty is
a complex and multidimensional issue as well as one that
results from human rights violations. The rights based approach tackles
development from both a top-down as well as a bottom-up synergy. The
positive practice of this approach is that it recognises people as key
actors in their development rather than passive recipients of
commodities and services. It focuses on participation and empowerment
both as a means and a goal. Moreover, it focuses on building
partnerships and improving accountability, thereby strengthening the
power of democracy and good governance. (HRBA: United Nations).
The effectiveness of this approach is still
questioned and the challenges in academic discourse remain manifold.
However, the RBA is worth pursuing in in development primarily for two
reasons.
Firstly, it leads to empowerment. The RBA brings
in legal tools and institutions, and thereby legitimacy, as a means to
secure human development. It integrates the political side of
development and efforts to make legal frameworks more just and
supportive of the rights of the poor. By doing so, it builds the
capacities of the marginalised by strengthening their skills, awareness
and possibilities for designing alternatives to the problem of poverty.
It amounts to give voice to the poor and enhance their capabilities to
take greater control over their lives. By focusing on empowerment of the
poor as a means and a goal, this approach attacks the structural causes
of poverty that are embedded within the structures of power and inequity
(Kapoor 2007).
Secondly, it leads to sustainable outcomes. The
UNDP states that the RBA is one that emphasizes both on development
outcomes and the process by which rights are realized. By focusing on
processes and empowerment, RBA overcomes the shortcomings of
unsustainable project-based interventions and reduces the dependency on
external aid. Sustainability is accomplished when communities can claim
their rights from government agencies to deliver services and
effectively monitor their quality. Active and meaningful participation
from the beginning of the decision-making process increases the
sustainability of interventions.
HRBA strengthens development strategies by
facilitating and enhancing the enabling environment for equitable
development. Its emphasis is on pro-poor development and empowering
people to take decisions pertaining to their own course of life leading
to development processes and outcomes that are inclusive and just
(UNICEF 2012).
Integrating the human rights development approach
Rights based approach to development offers new
perspectives and solutions to traditional development objectives.
Development Alternatives, like development organisations across the
world, integrates and facilitates the rights based approach into its
framework of activities and development work. Our projects necessarily
constitute elements of increasing community awareness on political,
social and economic rights. We work closely with women groups and rural
communities to help them avail their rights and services. We work to
improve accountability mechanisms, advocate for policy as well as focus
on helping local communities demand actions for rights and entitlements.
This work has helped communities access the entitlements in terms of
agriculture, water, housing, sanitation, employment, etc. It also helps
women avail of legal and justice services. This approach strengthens the
‘voiceless’ and includes principles of empowerment, democracy, free and
meaningful participation, equality and accountability- all of which lie
at the foundation of the contemporary concerns of human rights,
development and governance. q