Wetlands And Climate Change
 

Wetlands are the ecotones or transitional zones between permanently aquatic and dry terrestrial ecosystems. According to Wetlands International, a global network working on wetlands, the wetlands are: “Areas on which water covers the soil or if water is present either at or near the surface of that soil. Water can also be present within the root zone, all year or just during various periods of time of the year.” The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands further goes on to specify “wetlands as areas both natural or artificial, permanent or temporary, with water that is static or flowing, fresh, brackish or salt, including areas of marine water the depth of which at low tide does not exceed six metres”, including lakes and rivers, swamps, fens and marshes, wet grasslands and peat lands, oases, estuaries, deltas and tidal flats, near-shore marine areas, mangroves and coral reefs, and human-made sites such as fish ponds, rice paddies, reservoirs, and salt pans.

Wetlands can be classified as inland and coastal areas. India is home to a variety of wetlands from the mangroves of Sunderbans to the Rann of Kutch; from Wullar Lake in Jammu and Kashmir to the back waters of Kerala. There are 25 Ramsar sites, spread across 677.13 hectares. Two of these, i.e. Keoladeo National Park and Loktak Lake are under the Montreux records indicating areas that need immediate attention due to the changes in ecological character that have occurred, are occurring, or are likely to occur as a result of technological developments, pollution or other human interference. ‘The National Wetland Conservation Programme’ enlists 68 wetlands.

Wetlands provide services for human survival and development. They provide food and water, purify water, export and retain sediments and nutrients, replenish groundwater, control floods, stabilise shorelines, and protect shorelines from storms. Wetlands mitigate climate change and can offer adaptation measures. They are also a home to a wide range of biodiversity. Besides economic and biological services, wetlands also offer cultural values, recreation and tourism benefits.

The Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, called by the Ramsar Convention, is an inter-governmental treaty that provides the framework for national action and international co-operation for the conservation and wise use of wetlands and their resources. It got its name from the Iranian City of Ramsar, where it was signed in 1971 by 160 parties across the myriad geographic regions of the world. The wise use of wetlands is defined as "the maintenance of their ecological character, achieved through the implementation of ecosystem-friendly approaches, within the context of sustainable development". The convention covers 1911 wetlands of international importance covering 186.9 million hectares.

On a global scale, wetlands provide services worth trillions of US dollars every year, contributing to human health and environmental well-being. A recent study on the role of coastal wetlands in reducing the severity of impacts from hurricanes in the United States found that they provided storm protection services with an estimated value of US$ 23.2 billion per year. The conversion or loss of one hectare of coastal wetland resulted in the loss of ecosystem services worth US$33,000 per year, on an average. Past studies show that in the long run, the value of converting Thai mangroves to shrimp farms, draining freshwater marshes for intensive agriculture in Canada, and operating unsustainable fishing practices on coral reefs in the Philippines, was between 60 per cent and 75 per cent lower than the benefits from wetland conservation and sustainable use.

Demand for their services is likely to intensify as human populations increase and development accelerates. With the increasing pressure on water resources and the threats posed by climate change, there is an urgent need to maximise these free benefits. The ability of wetlands to adapt to changing conditions is crucial to the well-being of the people and the planet.

Peat Land Restoration in Germany

Over 930,000 hectore unit of peat land in Germany has been drained to increase the area available for agricultural production. The carbon sink has been transferred into a carbon source – emitting around 20 million tCO2-equivalents every year. Lowering of the water table and tillage has destroyed these areas of high biodiversity with valuable ecosystem services (water storage and purification, the fixation of nutrients and pollutants, and the sequestration and storage of carbon). The release of nutrients and pollutants from drained peat land decreases water quality and causes eutrophication of rivers and lakes.

Between 2000 and 2008, 10 per cent area of drained peat land was restored. Emissions of about 300,000 tCO2-equivalents every year are avoided. When assuming a marginal cost of damage caused by carbon emissions of 70 € per tCO2, the effort to restore peat lands avoids damage from carbon emissions of up to 21.7 million € every year, on average 728 € per hectare of restored peat land.

While the total damage costs of carbon emissions on drained peat land can exceed 1400€ per hectare, the process of revitalising peat land requires considerable initial investment. The initial cost of restoration ranges between 3000 - 5000 € per hectare in cases where land is purchased from farmers. The prices for avoided emissions ranges between 30 € to 50 € per avoided tCO2-equivalent. This is a low price compared to other emission reduction strategies, which can be reduced even further if restored peat land are used for alternative land uses that do not degrade the carbon stock. Further, it is important to consider the cost of forgone income from conventional agriculture (an average 585 € per hectare per year in 2007/2008 and foregone subsidies (which often exceed an additional 300 € per hectare) and which are directly attributable to number of hectares. Subsidised income from conventional agriculture not only provides incentives for harmful land use – but makes rehabilitation more costly (as reflected in the land price).

Alternative land uses on restored peatlands can generate income as well as avoid carbon emissions, thereby lowering opportunity costs.

(TEEB Case Study)

Despite their overwhelming values, wetlands are among the most highly threatened ecosystems on the planet. They are very vulnerable to climate change. Glaciers that feed many of the world’s major river and wetland systems will shrink due to melting. Many semi-arid areas are particularly exposed to the impact of climate change and are expected to suffer serious pressure on water resources and wetlands. Changes in precipitation patterns and increased frequency and intensity of freak events like droughts, storms and floods can influence the eco-systems. Higher water temperatures, floods and droughts, will reduce water quality and worsen many forms of pollution. The effects of climate change on wetlands will in turn affect the continued provision of the eco-system services.

Wetlands are also part of the solution to climate change. Both mitigation and adaptation have a relevance to wetlands. Mitigation refers to reducing the overall levels of greenhouse gases (GHGs) entering the atmosphere in the first place. Wetlands help in mitigation, by reducing the level of future GHG emissions. Wetlands especially peat lands, mangroves and salt marshes store huge amounts of carbon, making them important carbon sinks. Drainage, peat extraction and burning release carbon into the atmosphere in the form of more GHGs. Protecting them from damage or destruction can prevent the release of even more GHG into the atmosphere. One study found that damage to peat lands has been responsible for annual emissions of GHGs equivalent to 10 per cent of emissions from worldwide use of fossil fuels.

Conserving wetlands through microfinance programmes, India

East Kolkata Wetlands (EKW) is a threatened Ramsar site in West Bengal spread across 136 sq. Km. Water flows through wetlands’ mosaic of fishponds, lakes, swamps and canals that cover 4000 ha and acts as solar reactors to treat 880 million litres sewerage each day. These waste water fishponds also sustain the livelihood of 90,000 odd fishermen, surviving below the poverty level. EKW, is mostly considered as a sewerage dumping ground with no awareness about its environmental importance amongst the stakeholders.

A conservation partnership has been successfully developed through this project based on community-ecosystem approaches in the area. The whole community shares the responsibility of validating and evaluating the scheme, thus they are a part of the decision-making system in an adaptive project management. The formation of Self Help Groups that SAFE could establish with the supports from National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) has further strengthened this project. The fisherwomen have been exposed to training and visit programmes and young men have been trained with marketing skills. This capacity building has brought confidence. TATA-AIG Group has designed a micro insurance scheme for the people so that the little contribution remains an investment and the premium money is returned with bonus on completion of the tenure of the insurance in case even there is no claim for accidental benefits. Other corporates are also getting involved on the site.

The revenue collected from eco-tourism would be an alternative economic opportunity for sustenance. A portion of the excess revenue would go for premium of group micro-health insurance coverage for the wetlanders, who struggle in stinking sewerage waters for their livelihood and produce fish for the metropolis. The innovation is that here environmental awareness would explicitly act as a marketing tool for the revenue generation system and Bio-rights acted as an incentive for conservation.

The strategy for influencing public management aspect was in developing a win-win situation by assuring revenue returns from nature services/resources?

(TEEB Case study)

Adaptation means action to minimise the adverse impact of climate change. Coastal and floodplain wetlands help limit the damage from floods that are expected to become more frequent with the impending climate change. Mangroves, tidal flats and salt marshes absorb energy from storm and tidal surges, while the roots of wetland plants stabilise shorelines and reduce erosion. Lakes and freshwater marshes naturally store and slow down floodwater, helping to protect downstream areas from destructive flooding. Conservation and sustainable use of wetlands in semi-arid regions can help people and wildlife to survive periods of drought.

Many wetlands are crumbling under pressure to agriculture, industrialisation and urbanisation. As these wetlands shrink, so do the services that they provide for free, while the dangers of rising sea levels and increased storminess continue to grow. The loss of these wetlands will magnify the impact of climate change and be disastrous for our safety and water security. Thus, they deserve immediate and intensive action.

Using and managing wetlands wisely is the need of the hour. Maintenance of wetland networks and ‘corridors’ will help wetland-dependent plants and animals move to new areas, in response to changing climatic conditions. The attraction of short-term, private-sector profits continues to drive the destruction and degradation of wetlands in many parts of the world. Economic valuation for the services that wetlands offer can help in conservation and restoration efforts. Decision-makers need to factor in the long-term costs of lost or damaged eco-system services and ensure that their formulation and implementation of policies and legislation helps to redress the balance.

Conservation and sustainable use of existing wetlands, combined with restoration of destroyed or damaged wetlands, needs to be part of a climate change solution, combining land-use and water-use sectors like agriculture, water supply and energy. There is a need for regional co-operation to avoid or minimise threats to wetlands, restore damaged or destroyed wetlands and identify opportunities for wetland creation, where this would have clear benefits for adapting to climate change. Well-managed wetlands can be one of the best insurance policies against climate change impacts.
q


Kriti Nagrath
knagrath@devalt.org



Back to Contents

    Subscribe Home

Contact Us

About Us