e define
ourselves, our happiness, our achievements by our lifestyles - the way
we live. A good lifestyle, something we all aspire to achieve, has come
to be defined by how much we consume - the more the better.
However, our lifestyles are built on a limited natural resource base,
with unsustainable consumption patterns and incessant population growth
further exerting excessive pressure (SERI, et.al., 2009).
In a free market economy, consumption patterns drive
production. Advertise-ments and marketing today have made societies
believe that higher income and higher possessions will lead to happier
lives (Trott, 1997).
The youth have become a key focus of marketing
strategies due to the sheer size of the target group. India is one of
the youngest countries in the world today with approximately half of all
Indians (nearly 50 crore) below 25 years (Srivastava & Khullar, 2012).
Furthermore, it is estimated that nearly 250 million people are set to
join India’s workforce by 2030. The result of this is a considerable
increase in disposable incomes leading to conspicuous consumption
(Harjani, 2012).
However, research has established that above a
certain threshold, an increase in material wealth does not improve life
satisfaction any further (Bentley, et.al, 2004). The figure above
confirms this research by showing negative correlation between GDP per
capita and the overall happiness quotient of different countries.
The Post-2015 development agenda can play a crucial
role in influencing this young workforce to adopt sustainable lifestyles
by promoting sustainable consumption. Although Goal 7 of the Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs) was to ‘Ensure Environmental Sustainability’
(UN, 2000), there was no target that aimed at reducing unsustainable
consumption patterns. The UN Secretary General’s High Level Panel on the
Post-2015 Development Agenda specifically mentioned that the MDGs fell
short by ‘not addressing the need to promote sustainable patterns of
consumption and production’ (Schoon, et. al. 2013).
Sustainable consumption is defined as "the use of
goods and services that respond to basic needs and bring a better
quality of life, while minimising the use of natural resources, toxic
materials and emissions of waste and pollutants over the life cycle, so
as not to jeopardise the needs of future generations" (IISD,n.d.).
Hence, it does not advocate ‘stop consuming’
but ‘doing more and better with less’, through the reduction of
resource-use, degradation and pollution, while increasing the quality of
life for all.
Sustainable consumption cannot be imposed upon
people; it is choice they will have to make (Robins & Roberts, 1998).
The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) launched initiatives
like Education for Sustainable Consumption and Sustainable Lifestyles
and Youth to promote rational and responsible use of natural
resources, equitable socio-economic development and a better quality of
life for all. It aims to create a new and aware generation of young
people who incorporate sustainability in their personal and professional
decisions (Thoresen, 2010).
It is important that sustainable lifestyles be
introduced in the early years and continues right up to university
education programmes and professional and vocational training
programmes. The media and internet are very powerful tools to shape
young minds. UNEP and UNESCO have used these resources and have
developed an online training kit on responsible consumption for young
people - the YouthXchange: Towards Sustainable Lifestyles. It is
designed to support youth groups, schools and NGOs to spread the message
of consuming within the planetary boundaries. It offers examples of more
sustainable purchasing choices and most importantly, empowers young
people to put theory into practice (UNEP, n.d.).
Education can only empower and enable young people to
make informed choices. Ultimately, it is in the hands of the policy
makers to encourage promotion of sustainable consumption amongst the
youth.
q