he
World Habitat Day on the October 3 this year is yet another reminder that
there are scores of people in the world who do not have a home. Informal
estimates indicate that over a billion people across the world are in
need of a decent shelter. In rural areas of India alone, housing
shortage has been estimated at about 40 million. There are two
challenges ahead of us: one, how do we keep construction costs within
the limits of affordability of an average rural family so that families
can access housing on their own initiative and two, how do we ensure
that construction materials and processes are environmentally
sustainable
Often these two are seen in
conflict with each other. The main challenge for us, therefore, is to
find out solutions which help create conditions so that cost
optimisation and environmental concerns become complimentary to each
other.
The search for such solutions
is not new. For several decades now, different stakeholders have
developed building materials, technologies and housing delivery models
that address the concerns of affordability and environmental
sustainability. However, these models have been at a rather small scale
and have developed independent of each other. Due to lack of awareness
about environment degradation, coupled with the lack of community action
even among aware groups, new technologies have not taken ground among
average Indians. It is, therefore, important that we look at ways of
scaling up and mainstreaming these innovations by increasing their
acceptability in the society.
For poorer segments, a house is
not only a shelter. It is rather a symbol of a better life having been
achieved. The approach of such households to innovative materials and
technologies is influenced by the building typology of the more affluent
neighbours who have invariably used conventional materials and
technologies to construct their own houses. As the benefits of
innovative technologies remain hidden from the average homeowners, they
are unsure of the usability and long term sustainability as well as
longevity of these technology solutions. They are not comfortable with
alternate technologies presuming that if alternate technologies were
better than conventional technologies, richer neighbours with better
access to information and resources would have used them instead of
conventional ones.
There is an urgent need to act
at two levels: at the level of policy and at the field level. At the
policy level, we need a structured approach to formalise the use of
innovative material and technologies through standardisation and their
inclusion in the state Schedule of Rates. At the field level, we need to
popularise technologies that help in sustainable development. There is
also an urgent need to promote systems for local production and supply
as well as ensure availability of enough number of skilled workers in
the construction sector who know working with these technologies.
Over the years, the discourse
has evolved through closer interaction between various stakeholders
involved in the process of housing delivery. Given the visible and
shared commitment of these stakeholders towards ‘affordable housing for
all’, we can be optimistic that we will hopefully manage to walk the
talk, with a lower carbon foot print. q