Moving Forward for Green
Bricks
T he
brick sector in India is one of the largest and a major contributor to
the 9 per cent growth witnessed by the construction industry. The
industry, spread over 150,000 units employing eight million workers
seasonally to produce 170 million bricks, is one which mindlessly
guzzles over 24 million tones of coal to produce 42 million tones of CO2
emissions. Further it robs the agriculture sector, the backbone of the
Indian economic structure, of 350 million tones of fertile top soil. The
industry; due to its decentralised structure, rising energy
requirements, rising cost of raw materials and labor shortages; finds
itself on the brink of chaos, with the state playing an inactive role to
address this situation.
Though India is producing a
large quantity of bricks, the production is done with obsolete
technology namely the Bulls Trench Kiln (BTK) technology. Though there
are currently technologies which are not only more efficient but also
more eco friendly both in terms of resource usage and also emissions
quantities, brick entrepreneurs are not given enough incentives to
change their production techniques. What is sad is that so much is
possible if the government first applies more stringently the policies
it has already put in place and applies thought into providing an
atmosphere, which is a catalyst to growth in this sector.
One such policy states that the
State will procure 20 per cent of its resources from the Micro, Small
and Medium Enterprises (MSME). However, the procurement in reality is
merely 5 per cent or about 8,500 crores. If the procurement is high, the
total revenue may go as high as 34,000 crores.1
Some of the steps ahead in the
policy arena that could be used to emphasis cleaner technologies are as
follows:
•
A preferential regime
on using fly ash bricks in construction by making better usage of the
schedule of rates – used to procure materials by Public Works Department
(PWD)
•
Provision of green
credits or subsidies or clearances required by government
infrastructural projects only if such resources are used. This would
cause state owned consumers to consume more clean materials products,
hence providing the entrepreneurs in this sector more teeth and profit
margins, which would be an incentive
•
Also providing
necessary intermediaries which will help in channeling of liquid money
to the entrepreneurs. This is important as the size of individual
entrepreneurs is very small. This leads to a lack of confidence by the
banks in such entrepreneurs. But when a monetary organisation which is
specialised for this technique is ready to distribute the funds the
banks may be more trusting
•
Spreading of awareness
of the need and positives of techniques like Vertical Shaft Brick Kiln (VSBK)
and Fly Ash technology. Assistance should be provided in starting off
such ventures is required especially in the small clusters as these
technologies will bring in higher employment. They also have the added
advantage of being a yearly sector unlike other brick technologies which
are seasonal.
•
Bringing down the time
delay in the formalities in applying loans, flexible loans for ventures
having usage of newer green and clean technologies
The state needs to set a precedent, by which it
can instill confidence in this obsolete sector, it needs to move more
efficiently on the provisions in the pipeline – such as the ‘Green
Procurement Policy’ and make sure that those already present are
followed properly. The steps have to be taken on an immediate basis, as
the need for bricks will always be ubiquitous. q
Rohan George
rohang93@gmail.com
1
http://smetimes.tradeindia.com
Back to Contents
|